Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02

Hello, After seeing continuous interest in this document we are hereby confirming the adoption of the document in the WG. We would like to request the authors to submit a WG version and address the received comments, so that we can continue the discussion on the ML and at the upcoming IETF

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, September 2, 2016 7:05 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > To: Rolf Winter ; int-area@ietf.org > ... > This. Get some good examples. I haven't reviewed your experimental results, > but following a few common discovery

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02

Hi Rolf, On 9/2/16 2:38 PM, Rolf Winter wrote: > Hi Eliot, > > I though a bit more about what you said. I think the suggestions to > developers were clear in my mind but maybe aren't all that clearly > formulated. Here are the most important suggestions that I read from > the text: > > - Use

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02

Hi Eliot, I though a bit more about what you said. I think the suggestions to developers were clear in my mind but maybe aren't all that clearly formulated. Here are the most important suggestions that I read from the text: - Use IETF-specified protocols if possible - Avoid using

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02

Rolf, Thanks. Please see below. On 8/29/16 8:57 PM, Rolf Winter wrote: > >> What is needed are specific recommendations or even the strengthening of >> a generalized mechanism, the obvious candidate being mDNS/DNS-SD. What >> specific recommendations would the authors make when using

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02

Eliot, thanks for the review. Please find comments inline: Am 8/27/16 um 9:29 AM schrieb Eliot Lear: Juan Carlos, I like the idea of this document being published as an informational document, but I wonder if the document needs another rev or two first. While it is important to have privacy

Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-winfaa-intarea-broadcast-consider-02

Juan Carlos, I like the idea of this document being published as an informational document, but I wonder if the document needs another rev or two first. While it is important to have privacy considerations for discovery protocols, this document needs to go further than that to be useful to