On 7/7/2015 9:08 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:44:30PM +0100, Michel Thierry wrote:
On 7/7/2015 4:27 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:14:59PM +0100, Michel Thierry wrote:
In a 48b world, users can try to allocate buffers bigger than 4GB; in
these cases it
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6744
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Op 07-07-15 om 11:15 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> Since
>
> commit 8c7b5ccb729870e606321b3703e2c2e698c49a95
> Author: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
> Date: Tue Apr 21 17:13:19 2015 +0300
>
> drm/i915: Use atomic helpers for computing changed flags
>
> we compute the plane state for a modeset befor
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:45:23AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2015 10:32 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 04:19:01PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:15:01PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>>From: Tvrtko Ursulin
> >>>
> >>>When rotated a
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:26:06PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni
> >
> > The poor in_dbg_master() check was the only one without a reason
> > string. Give it a reason string so it won't feel excluded.
> >
> > Si
On 07/08/2015 10:32 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 04:19:01PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:15:01PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
When rotated and partial views were added no one spotted the resume
path which assumes only one GGTT
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:28:53PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Let's do a frontbuffer flush on dirty fb.
> To be used for DIRTYFB drm ioctl.
>
> This patch solves the biggest PSR known issue, that is
> missed screen updates during boot, mainly when there is a splash
> screen involved like Plymout
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:28:56PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> fbdev_set_par is called when fbcon is taking over control, but
> frontbuffer was being invalidated only on the first time when
> moving obj to GTT domain.
> However on the following calls write domain was already GTT
> so invalidate wa
On 7/6/2015 5:14 PM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä
Since
commit e62925567c7926e78bc8ca976cde5c28ea265a49
Author: Vandana Kannan
Date: Wed Jul 1 17:02:57 2015 +0530
drm/i915/bxt: BUNs related to port PLL
BXT DPLL can now generate frequencies in the 21
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 08:53:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:26:02PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni
> >
> > Before I continue sending fixes, let's just do some small adjustments to the
> > codebase. I really think these changes make the code better
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:27:05AM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote:
> wa_ctx_emit() depends on the name of a local variable; if the name of that
> variable is changed then we get compile errors. In this case it is unlikely
> to be changed as this macro is only used in this set of functions but
> Kernel
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:26:06PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni
>
> The poor in_dbg_master() check was the only one without a reason
> string. Give it a reason string so it won't feel excluded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 08-07-15 om 11:09 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:38:33AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 07-07-15 om 12:11 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:08:17AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst
wa_ctx_emit() depends on the name of a local variable; if the name of that
variable is changed then we get compile errors. In this case it is unlikely
to be changed as this macro is only used in this set of functions but
Kernel coding guidelines doesn't recommend doing this. It was my mistake
as I
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 04:19:01PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:15:01PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > From: Tvrtko Ursulin
> >
> > When rotated and partial views were added no one spotted the resume
> > path which assumes only one GGTT VMA per object and hence is now
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:02:32PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 07-07-15 om 13:16 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:08:18AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Make sure the primary plane is set up correctly. This is done by
> >> setting plane_state->src and plane_state
Op 08-07-15 om 11:09 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:38:33AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 07-07-15 om 12:11 schreef Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:08:17AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
@@ -12392,27 +12379,124 @@ static bool intel_fuzzy_clock_check(
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:38:33AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 07-07-15 om 12:11 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:08:17AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> @@ -12392,27 +12379,124 @@ static bool intel_fuzzy_clock_check(int clock1,
> >> int clock2)
> >>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 08:23:46PM +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 13:24 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:19:03PM +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 19:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 02:11:55PM -0300,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:00:22AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 07-07-15 om 18:43 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:08:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 07-07-15 om 14:10 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst
Op 08-07-15 om 10:12 schreef Patrik Jakobsson:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:14:01PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 07-07-15 om 14:39 schreef Patrik Jakobsson:
>>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:22:12PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 07-07-15 om 11:18 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:40:18AM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote:
>
>
> On 7/7/2015 6:51 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 02:22:20PM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote:
> >> Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required.
> >> Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred
Op 07-07-15 om 12:11 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:08:17AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Instead of doing ad-hoc checks we already have a way of checking
>> if the state is compatible or not. Use this to force a modeset.
>>
>> Only during modesets, or with PIPE_CONFIG_QUI
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6740
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:14:01PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 07-07-15 om 14:39 schreef Patrik Jakobsson:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:22:12PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 07-07-15 om 11:18 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:08:14AM +0200, Maarten Lankhor
Op 07-07-15 om 18:43 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:08:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 07-07-15 om 14:10 schreef Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 07-07-15 om 11:18 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Jul 0
On Wed 08-07-15 09:32:18, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[...]
> Ok that's starting to get nasty. Can you please test what happens when you
> boot with drm.vblankoffdelay=0 and whether drm.vblankoffdelay=1000 has an
> effect on reproduction rate? No debug output needed.
No difference. See the kernel log fro
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:40:17AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I have just tried to boot 4.2-rc1 and cannot seem to reproduce the issue
> anymore.
>
> On Tue 07-07-15 10:43:58, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> [...]
> > Can you please
> > boot with drm.debug=0xf (lots more nois in dmesg with this) and repr
Yu Dai writes:
> On 07/07/2015 09:49 AM, Yu Dai wrote:
>> On 07/03/2015 07:09 AM, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> > Pass around requests to carry context deeper in callchain.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 30 ++
>> >
From: Ankitprasad Sharma
When constructing a batchbuffer, it is sometimes crucial to know the
largest hole into which we can fit a fenceable buffer (for example when
handling very large objects on gen2 and gen3). This depends on the
fragmentation of pinned buffers inside the aperture, a question
From: Rodrigo Vivi
When constructing a batchbuffer, it is sometimes crucial to know the
largest hole into which we can fit a fenceable buffer (for example when
handling very large objects on gen2 and gen3). This depends on the
fragmentation of pinned buffers inside the aperture, a question only t
From: Ankitprasad Sharma
This patch extends the GET_APERTURE ioctl to add support
for getting total size and available size of the stolen region
as well as single largest block available in the stolen region.
Also adds debugfs support to retieve the size information of the
stolen area.
v2: respi
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
