Souza, Jose schreef op vr 09-08-2019 om 17:16 [+]:
> Fix released on Linux 5.2.8
Linux 5.2.8 doesn't have the pretty obvious freezes so this fix works for me
too. Thanks for letting me know!
Paul Bolle
; Huge thanks again
You're welcome.
Paul Bolle
Hi Jose,
James Bottomley schreef op do 18-07-2019 om 06:29 [+0900]:
> On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 23:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > I've just reached a day of uptime with your revert. (The proper
> > uptime is just a fraction of a day, this being a laptop.) Anyhow, no
> > sc
being a laptop.) Anyhow, no screen freezes occurred
during this day.
So feel free to add my Tested-by tag to your revert. But please don't forget
that James earned a Reported-by tag.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
Hi Jose,
Souza, Jose schreef op ma 15-07-2019 om 21:03 [+]:
> So the issue did not happened again with the patch applied?
Not in the three days that I've been running 5.2 kernels with the hack applied
(so that should be about twelve hours of proper uptime).
> If you still have the kernel
James Bottomley schreef op vr 12-07-2019 om 07:19 [-0700]:
> It has survived 6h without manifesting the regression. Starting again
> to try a whole day.
And I'm currently at four hours without a screen freeze. Which is much, much
longer than I was able to achieve without the hack applied.
Paul Bolle schreef op do 11-07-2019 om 13:20 [+0200]:
> Chris Wilson schreef op do 11-07-2019 om 10:29 [+0100]:
> > Temporary workaround would be to set i915.enable_psr=0
>
> That workaround seems to work for me. Over an hour of uptime without any
> screen freezes.
May or may
ks in,
unlocking the screen still works, as the screen then isn't frozen anymore.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
ime, but that apparently has no effect. Should that file be read-only?)
Feel free to ask me to test a fix (or a revert) once you've figured out what
to do about this.
Paul Bolle
npoint the offending commit by Friday the 12th. If I'm lucky. (There are
other things to do than bisecting this issue.)
If you find that commit before I do, I'll be all ears.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
ThinkPads from my embarrassing pile of outdated
hardware to do nasty bisects, but I'm not about to loose any income if my much
appreciated XPS 13 is out of order for a while.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
> patches that might be the problem would be welcome.
(Perhaps my message of yesterday never reached you.)
It seems I hit this problem quite easily. Bisecting v5.1..v5.2 could be a real
chore, so perhaps we could coordinate efforts (off-list)?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
equent too (think every few minutes). Eg, two freezes while
composing this message!
My totally silly workaround is suspending (via Fn + Insert) and resuming.
Did you manage to narrow this any further?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
USERINCLUDE
variable, which is actually part of the LINUXINCLUDE variable, but split off
to make things confusing.)
Why do you need to include linux/kconfig.h here?
> #include
> #include
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@
arten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>
> Cc: bruno.pag...@ens-lyon.org
> Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blue...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl>
> Cc: Joseph Yasi <joe.y...@gmail.com>
> Tested-by:
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 02:16 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Yes, it's been reported and should be fixed in -mm.
> The fix should show up in -next in a little bit.
Great.
> For now, try:
> $ sed -i -e 's/\xA0/ /g' scripts/get_maintainer.pl
Thanks,
ms to be the no break space. That character was inserted more
often further down the patch.)
Anybody else seeing this?
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
RROR* failed to inform PCU
about cdclk change
<3>[108639.090776] [drm:skl_set_cdclk [i915]] *ERROR* failed to inform PCU
about cdclk change
Related or a coincidence?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.or
1240d006c ("drm: add generic zpos
property") and not applying this fix, right?
Anyway, I'm happy to grade your answer in a few days. Please prod if
notifying you of your grade takes too long.
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedeskto
ave any idea why this
issue apparently never surfaced before v4.8?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Detailed post, but please give it a quick scan.]
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:06 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:08 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Bisecting the offending commit between v4.8 and v4.8.1 would be a good
> > start.
>
> That would be betw
e seventeen commits. Still, it will probably be next week before I
have a day or two to actually perform that bisect.
To be continued,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:06 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> That might take some time. Because bisecting always takes a long time
> and especially since hitting this WARNING sometimes takes over an hour.
> Anyhow, please prod me if I stay silent for too long.
For the record: I just had to po
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 17:34 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> In the mean time, please file a bug over at [1] so we don't lose
> track.
Done: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98214
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Int
cially since hitting this WARNING sometimes takes over an hour.
Anyhow, please prod me if I stay silent for too long.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
out this WARNING?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1368 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:14178
skl_max_scale.part.120+0x75/0x80 [i915]
WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || cdclk < crtc_clock)
Modules linked in:
rfcomm fuse nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_broadcast ip6t_rp
.
I can anyway shove out these macros to end the discussion.
I'd rather convince you than annoy you into doing as I suggested.
BTW whether you buy the argument or not, please do treat yourself
with ice cream for being able to make such a comment.
Will do.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
pci_set_power_state(drm_dev-pdev, PCI_D3hot);
return 0;
Just two days ago we discussed this bug too, see
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/17/327 . That message contains a link to a
patch I cobbled together for yet another ThinkPad hitting this, but with
PCI_SUBVENDOR_ID_IBM involved.
Paul
Hi Shobhit,
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 23:24 +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 19:30 +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
--- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
+config PWM_CRC
+ bool Intel
v4.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
().
+MODULE_AUTHOR(Shobhit Kumar shobhit.ku...@intel.com);
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION(Intel Crystal Cove PWM Driver);
+MODULE_LICENSE(GPL v2);
These macros will be effectively preprocessed away for built-in only
code.
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx
this for that X41 at the end of the
message. The patch is rather ugly. Should we perhaps try a quirk table
or something like that?
Paul Bolle
8
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: work around hang during hibernation on gen3 too
Commit ab3be73fa7b4 (drm/i915: gen4: work around hang during
). That laptop is now running v3.19.1 and never hit this issue.
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
of WARNINGs was reported for v3.19-rc1
in http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150131211609.GA3710@yulia-desktop .
Commit f9b61ff6bce9 (drm/i915: Push vblank enable/disable past
encoder-enable/disable) silenced it again in v4.0-rc1. I guess that
commit will end up in v3.19-stable in due time.
Paul Bolle
drm_pci_exit(driver, i915_pci_driver);
}
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
update to
fix this, what should I ask them to do?
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 01:44 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
Your commit 2225a28fd916 (drm/i915: Ditch UMS config option) is
included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20140725). It removes the
Kconfig symbol DRM_I915_UMS
evaluate to true.
Is the trivial cleanup to remove them already queued somewhere?
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
(crtc-base);
crtc-plane = plane;
Instead of the revert or on top of the revert?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Daniel Vetter schreef op ma 14-07-2014 om 09:18 [+0200]:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:40AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 82e7d57f0a8a
.
Reported-and-tested-by: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl
Maybe that should be something like:
Reported-bisected-and-tested-by: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl
Cc: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 1 +
1
Paul Bolle schreef op wo 02-07-2014 om 10:53 [+0200]:
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A
bisect result would be awesome.
The bisect (which took me quite some time) points at commit 98ec77397a5c
(drm
since I can't
yet narrow the bisect to changes in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/, can I?).
Don't expect results before v3.16-rc4.
Feel free to remind me if I stay silent on this subject for too long.
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx
] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0x93/0xb0
[c0a045df] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x16
Feel free to prod me for further details.
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Bjorn Helgaas schreef op ma 10-03-2014 om 20:07 [-0600]:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 18:07 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
A bit of doubt is caused by two new
be
unrelated. They're unclear to me, anyway.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 18:07 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
A bit of doubt is caused by two new boot time messages:
pnp 00:00: unknown resource type 10 in _CRS
pnp 00:00: can't evaluate _CRS: 1
But I haven't yet
, CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=n here.
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
to the tree; and
- how can I use the list of those hashes to limit the range of commits
to do a git bisect?
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
. Or is there some way to
actually do that?
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
commit that might just be in time for v3.14.
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:05 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
On an (rather old) ThinkPad X41, which also uses i915, brightness
adjustments stopped working altogether in v3.14-rc1 (I haven't used its
docking station in the v3.14 release
on rebasing the
branch soon.
Does this mean I might be better of not bisecting this just yet? Or are
these changes targeted at v3.15 (or later)?
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
-fed19fff : reserved
fed14000-fed17fff : pnp 00:01
fed18000-fed18fff : pnp 00:01
fed19000-fed19fff : pnp 00:01
fed2-fed8 : reserved
fee0-fee00fff : Local APIC
fee0-fee00fff : reserved
ff00- : reserved
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 08:33 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
The WARNING is now gone during suspend and resume (having tested that
thoroughly - ie, twice). But I still see it at boot. Is there a related
fix for that WARNING
the WARNING that I currently see at boot go away?
Paul Bolle
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 080f6fd..114db51 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915
On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 14:12 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:00:29AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
I assume I need to test this, on top of 7c063c725987 (drm/i915: take
mode config lock around crtc disable at suspend), to see if this makes
the WARNING that I currently see
On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 15:23 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
This generated quite a bit of debug messages so I only copied the
WARNING and the drm (related) messages immediately preceding it. Please
feel free to prod again
is currently in drm-intel-fixes. I'll forward it early next week.
Thanks!
The WARNING is now gone during suspend and resume (having tested that
thoroughly - ie, twice). But I still see it at boot. Is there a related
fix for that WARNING during boot?
Paul Bolle
] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0x8b/0xb0
5[2.683248] [c09c3a0d] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
Feel free to prod for further details.
Paul Bolle
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
the WARNING, is attached. Have fun!
Paul Bolle
6[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
6[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
6[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
5[0.00] Linux version 3.13.0-0.rc2.1.local1.fc18.i686 ([...]) (gcc
version 4.7.2 20121109 (Red
62 matches
Mail list logo
