On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:10:23 -0800, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
This patch actually makes the watermark code even uglier (if that's
possible), but has the advantage of sharing code between SNB and ILK at
least. Longer term we should refactor the watermark stuff into its own
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:07:22 +, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
I tweaked the patch to pass the watermark structs through to the check
routine. The box survives s2ram, but I have now also experienced the
mysterious slow down after resuming.
As Eric first said the cause for
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:30:29 +, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:07:22 +, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
I tweaked the patch to pass the watermark structs through to the check
routine. The box survives s2ram, but I have now also
This patch actually makes the watermark code even uglier (if that's
possible), but has the advantage of sharing code between SNB and ILK at
least. Longer term we should refactor the watermark stuff into its own
file and clean it up now that we know how it's supposed to work.
Supporting WM2 on my
