On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:10:23 -0800, Jesse Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > This patch actually makes the watermark code even uglier (if that's > possible), but has the advantage of sharing code between SNB and ILK at > least. Longer term we should refactor the watermark stuff into its own > file and clean it up now that we know how it's supposed to work. > > Supporting WM2 on my Vaio reduced power consumption by around 0.5W, so > this patch is definitely worthwhile (though it also needs lots of test > coverage).
I tweaked the patch to pass the watermark structs through to the check routine. The box survives s2ram, but I have now also experienced the mysterious slow down after resuming. Pushed to -next for wider testing, -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
