On 13.05.2016 15:00, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:45:09PM +0300, Gabriel Feceoru wrote:
basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank subtest sometimes fails asserting counted frames to
be aproximately equal with the estimated number.
This is a false negative, one of the reasons being the
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:00:33PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:45:09PM +0300, Gabriel Feceoru wrote:
> > basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank subtest sometimes fails asserting counted frames to
> > be aproximately equal with the estimated number.
> >
> > This is a false negative,
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:45:09PM +0300, Gabriel Feceoru wrote:
> basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank subtest sometimes fails asserting counted frames to
> be aproximately equal with the estimated number.
>
> This is a false negative, one of the reasons being the precision lost when
> truncating a
basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank subtest sometimes fails asserting counted frames to
be aproximately equal with the estimated number.
This is a false negative, one of the reasons being the precision lost when
truncating a fractional number.
Fixed this by using floating point arithmetic.
Cc: Jani Nikula
