Some return values are not useful and can be ignored.  Wrap those cases
inside igt_ignore_warn(), not only to make sure compilers are happy but
also to clearly document our decisions.

Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzyszto...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: MichaƂ Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
---
 tests/core_hotunplug.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/core_hotunplug.c b/tests/core_hotunplug.c
index d30ad8525..24beed81a 100644
--- a/tests/core_hotunplug.c
+++ b/tests/core_hotunplug.c
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static void set_filter_from_device(int fd)
        char path[PATH_MAX + 1];
 
        igt_assert(igt_sysfs_path(fd, path, PATH_MAX));
-       strncat(path, "/device", PATH_MAX - strlen(path));
+       igt_ignore_warn(strncat(path, "/device", PATH_MAX - strlen(path)));
        igt_assert(realpath(path, dst));
 
        igt_device_filter_free_all();
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ igt_main
        igt_fixture {
                post_healthcheck(&priv);
 
-               close(priv.fd.sysfs_bus);
-               close(priv.fd.sysfs_drv);
+               igt_ignore_warn(close(priv.fd.sysfs_bus));
+               igt_ignore_warn(close(priv.fd.sysfs_drv));
        }
 }
-- 
2.21.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to