Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 7/8] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth.

2020-03-02 Thread Lisovskiy, Stanislav
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 18:20 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:00:43PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > According to BSpec 53998, we should try to > > restrict qgv points, which can't provide > > enough bandwidth for desired display configuration. > > > > Currently we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 7/8] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth.

2020-02-27 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:00:43PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > According to BSpec 53998, we should try to > restrict qgv points, which can't provide > enough bandwidth for desired display configuration. > > Currently we are just comparing against all of > those and take minimum(worst

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 7/8] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth.

2020-02-25 Thread Stanislav Lisovskiy
According to BSpec 53998, we should try to restrict qgv points, which can't provide enough bandwidth for desired display configuration. Currently we are just comparing against all of those and take minimum(worst case). v2: Fixed wrong PCode reply mask, removed hardcoded values. v3: Forbid

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 7/8] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth.

2020-02-24 Thread Stanislav Lisovskiy
According to BSpec 53998, we should try to restrict qgv points, which can't provide enough bandwidth for desired display configuration. Currently we are just comparing against all of those and take minimum(worst case). v2: Fixed wrong PCode reply mask, removed hardcoded values. v3: Forbid