Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Wait PSR2 get out of deep sleep to update pipe

2021-10-21 Thread Gwan-gyeong Mun
On 10/14/21 12:03 AM, Souza, Jose wrote: On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 23:39 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: On 10/11/21 11:53 PM, Souza, Jose wrote: On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 12:31 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: On 10/6/21 11:04 PM, Souza, Jose wrote: On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 11:50 +0300, Gwan-gyeong

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Wait PSR2 get out of deep sleep to update pipe

2021-10-13 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 23:39 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: > > On 10/11/21 11:53 PM, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 12:31 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: > > > > > > On 10/6/21 11:04 PM, Souza, Jose wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 11:50 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Wait PSR2 get out of deep sleep to update pipe

2021-10-13 Thread Gwan-gyeong Mun
On 10/11/21 11:53 PM, Souza, Jose wrote: On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 12:31 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: On 10/6/21 11:04 PM, Souza, Jose wrote: On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 11:50 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: On 10/6/21 2:18 AM, José Roberto de Souza wrote: Alderlake-P was getting 'max time under

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Wait PSR2 get out of deep sleep to update pipe

2021-10-11 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2021-10-07 at 12:31 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: > > On 10/6/21 11:04 PM, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 11:50 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: > > > > > > On 10/6/21 2:18 AM, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > > Alderlake-P was getting 'max time under evasion' messages when

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Wait PSR2 get out of deep sleep to update pipe

2021-10-07 Thread Gwan-gyeong Mun
On 10/6/21 11:04 PM, Souza, Jose wrote: On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 11:50 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: On 10/6/21 2:18 AM, José Roberto de Souza wrote: Alderlake-P was getting 'max time under evasion' messages when PSR2 is enabled, this is due PIPE_SCANLINE/PIPEDSL returning 0 over a period of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Wait PSR2 get out of deep sleep to update pipe

2021-10-06 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-10-06 at 11:50 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: > > On 10/6/21 2:18 AM, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > Alderlake-P was getting 'max time under evasion' messages when PSR2 > > is enabled, this is due PIPE_SCANLINE/PIPEDSL returning 0 over a > > period of time longer than

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Wait PSR2 get out of deep sleep to update pipe

2021-10-06 Thread Gwan-gyeong Mun
On 10/6/21 2:18 AM, José Roberto de Souza wrote: Alderlake-P was getting 'max time under evasion' messages when PSR2 is enabled, this is due PIPE_SCANLINE/PIPEDSL returning 0 over a period of time longer than VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US. For PSR1 we had the same issue so intel_psr_wait_for_idle()

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display: Wait PSR2 get out of deep sleep to update pipe

2021-10-05 Thread José Roberto de Souza
Alderlake-P was getting 'max time under evasion' messages when PSR2 is enabled, this is due PIPE_SCANLINE/PIPEDSL returning 0 over a period of time longer than VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US. For PSR1 we had the same issue so intel_psr_wait_for_idle() was implemented to wait for PSR1 to get into idle