>
> On 06/10/16 13:26, Conselvan De Oliveira, Ander wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 13:11 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, "Argotti, Yann" wrote:
> >>>
>
> >
> > On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
> >
On 06/10/16 13:26, Conselvan De Oliveira, Ander wrote:
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 13:11 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, "Argotti, Yann" wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
wrote:
This week
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 13:11 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, "Argotti, Yann" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This week regressions
On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, "Argotti, Yann" wrote:
>> > On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
>> > wrote:
>> > > This week regressions
>> >
>> > In the past we used "regression", "bisect_pending", and "bisected" in
>> > the bugzilla
> > On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
> > wrote:
> > > This week regressions
> >
> > In the past we used "regression", "bisect_pending", and "bisected" in
> > the bugzilla "Keywords" field. Can we start using those again, please?
>
> I think
>
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
> wrote:
> > This week regressions
>
> In the past we used "regression", "bisect_pending", and "bisected" in
> the bugzilla "Keywords" field. Can we start using those again, please?
I think this is a very
On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
wrote:
> This week regressions
In the past we used "regression", "bisect_pending", and "bisected" in
the bugzilla "Keywords" field. Can we start using those again, please?
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
This week regressions
+---+---+++
| BugId | Summary | Created on |
Bisect |
+---+---+++
| 97994 | [REGRESS] [BISECT]