On 4/19/2023 10:29 AM, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 4/19/2023 4:12 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
Hi Ville and Ankit,
I actually do not think this is a problem with the DSC logic, but it
is a problem with the intel_dp_link_compute_config() where we should
do something if max_bpp is 0 instead of
On 4/19/2023 4:12 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
Hi Ville and Ankit,
I actually do not think this is a problem with the DSC logic, but it
is a problem with the intel_dp_link_compute_config() where we should
do something if max_bpp is 0 instead of just returning a -EINVAL
directly.
My question here:
Hi Ville and Ankit,
I actually do not think this is a problem with the DSC logic, but it
is a problem with the intel_dp_link_compute_config() where we should
do something if max_bpp is 0 instead of just returning a -EINVAL
directly.
My question here:
- In case of PCON, yuv format, is it a valid
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:09:16PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>
> On 4/18/2023 6:16 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 03:48:12PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> >> Hi Ville,
> >>
> >> Could you suggest how to handle the intel_dp_link_compute_config()
> >> when the max_bpp is
On 4/18/2023 6:16 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 03:48:12PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
Hi Ville,
Could you suggest how to handle the intel_dp_link_compute_config()
when the max_bpp is returned as 0, currently
it just exits the loop and returns a -EINVAL and this triggers
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 03:48:12PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> Hi Ville,
>
> Could you suggest how to handle the intel_dp_link_compute_config()
> when the max_bpp is returned as 0, currently
> it just exits the loop and returns a -EINVAL and this triggers the DSC path.
> While we should be
Hi Ville,
Could you suggest how to handle the intel_dp_link_compute_config()
when the max_bpp is returned as 0, currently
it just exits the loop and returns a -EINVAL and this triggers the DSC path.
While we should be completely failing the modeset and encoder_config
in this case instead of
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:22 PM Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:07:01PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:42 AM Ville Syrjälä
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:34:08PM +, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > > > In the function
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:07:01PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:42 AM Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:34:08PM +, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > > In the function intel_dp_max_bpp(), currently if bpc < 0 in case of error,
> > > we return 0
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:42 AM Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:34:08PM +, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > In the function intel_dp_max_bpp(), currently if bpc < 0 in case of error,
> > we return 0 instead of returning an err code of -EINVAL.
> > This throws off the logic in the
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:34:08PM +, Manasi Navare wrote:
> In the function intel_dp_max_bpp(), currently if bpc < 0 in case of error,
> we return 0 instead of returning an err code of -EINVAL.
> This throws off the logic in the calling function.
What logic? The caller doesn't expect to get
11 matches
Mail list logo