Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 12:43:50) > > On 09/04/2018 11:51, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:40:08) > >> > >> On 09/04/2018 11:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:17:04) > > On 09/04/2018 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace

On 09/04/2018 11:51, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:40:08) On 09/04/2018 11:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:17:04) On 09/04/2018 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote: Downside being that we either then use atomic64 throughout or we mix

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:40:08) > > On 09/04/2018 11:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:17:04) > >> > >> On 09/04/2018 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>> Downside being that we either then use atomic64 throughout or we mix > >>> atomic32/atomic64 knowing

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace

On 09/04/2018 11:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:17:04) On 09/04/2018 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote: Downside being that we either then use atomic64 throughout or we mix atomic32/atomic64 knowing that we're on x86. (I feel like someone else must have solved this

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace

Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-04-09 11:27:17) > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:17:04) > > > > On 09/04/2018 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Downside being that we either then use atomic64 throughout or we mix > > > atomic32/atomic64 knowing that we're on x86. (I feel like someone else > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:17:04) > > On 09/04/2018 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Downside being that we either then use atomic64 throughout or we mix > > atomic32/atomic64 knowing that we're on x86. (I feel like someone else > > must have solved this problem in a much neater way,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace

On 09/04/2018 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 10:11:53) On 06/04/2018 21:17, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-05 13:39:19) From: Tvrtko Ursulin Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace and not yet runnable

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 10:11:53) > > On 06/04/2018 21:17, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-05 13:39:19) > >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin > >> > >> Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace and not yet runnable due > >> unresolved

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace

On 06/04/2018 21:17, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-05 13:39:19) From: Tvrtko Ursulin Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace and not yet runnable due unresolved dependencies. v2: Rename and move under the container struct. (Chris

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-05 13:39:19) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Keep a count of requests submitted from userspace and not yet runnable due > unresolved dependencies. > > v2: Rename and move under the container struct. (Chris Wilson) > v3: Rebase. > >