Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-04-09 11:17:04)
> On 09/04/2018 10:25, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Downside being that we either then use atomic64 throughout or we mix
> > atomic32/atomic64 knowing that we're on x86. (I feel like someone else
> > must have solved this problem in a much neater way, before they went to
> > per-cpu stats ;)
> Is the winky implying you know who and where? :) We have three potential 
> solutions now, even for if the winky is suggesting something.

Nah, just that atomic/locked counters are so old hat. Not sure if there
remain any good examples for hotpath counters that remain applicable to
our code.
Intel-gfx mailing list

Reply via email to