Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Enable aspect/centering panel fitting for Ironlake.

2010-08-05 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2010.08.05 09:05:15 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: Please illuminate the poor ignorant fool (that's me) what the requirements for eDP are. Even better in patch form. ;-) Does eDP require panel fitting always? yeah, you can see recently added panel fitting support for eDP, it should be same

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Enable aspect/centering panel fitting for Ironlake.

2010-08-05 Thread Chris Wilson
v2: Hook in DP paths to keep FULLSCREEN panel fitting on eDP. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Zhenyu Wang zhen...@linux.intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile|1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 16

Re: [Intel-gfx] 845 help

2010-08-05 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/08/01 20:49 (GMT+0200) Rüdiger Härtel composed: I have a 845GL graphics chip and the driver reports nearly every time I use my copmuter that the GPU has hung up and acceleration is disabled. After this happend a restart of X - which happens when I log off and on again - is not

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: Use ASLE response codes defined in 0.1

2010-08-05 Thread Chris Wilson
Within i915_opregion.c there are two blocks of semantically identical ASLE response codes defined. Only one of those matches the ACPI IGD OpRegion Specification 0.1, use those. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: Use ASLE response codes defined in 0.1

2010-08-05 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 12:54:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: Within i915_opregion.c there are two blocks of semantically identical ASLE response codes defined. Only one of those matches the ACPI IGD OpRegion Specification 0.1, use those. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk

Re: [Intel-gfx] how get drm-intel-next into a stable kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:38:55 +0100 Sergio Monteiro Basto ser...@sergiomb.no-ip.org wrote: Hi, Have some kind of howto doc ?, about merging, testing os using drm-intel-next with a stable kernel, lets say kernel-2.6.35. Short answer: you don't. The drm-intel-next branch is a full kernel tree

Re: [Intel-gfx] how get drm-intel-next into a stable kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:54:09AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: Longer answer: drm-intel-next bits are targeted at the next kernel release. When important fixes from drm-intel-next land in Linus's tree, you can request that they be back ported to the stable tree by sending a note to

Re: [Intel-gfx] hotplug CRT detection

2010-08-05 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:53 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: So I've been reviewing the i915/ironlake CRT detect code and am a bit confused. I though on the i945 and above that we had proper CRT hotplug detection with an IRQ, that didn't require any polling. Now looking at the code when we do a

Re: [Intel-gfx] how get drm-intel-next into a stable kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Timothy B. Terriberry
Any suggestions of patches to test for those of us still experiencing eDP problems? I've seen a bunch fly by the list, but it's been unclear to me which were supposed to address what issues, or how successful any of them were. I was able to get 2.6.34 to work on my Dell E6510 by reverting

Re: [Intel-gfx] how get drm-intel-next into a stable kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 05/08/2010 20:47, Timothy B. Terriberry a écrit : This no longer works on 2.6.35 (black screen after starting X). Could be https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16496 ? Brice ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Intel-gfx] how get drm-intel-next into a stable kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Timothy B. Terriberry
Brice Goglin wrote: Le 05/08/2010 20:47, Timothy B. Terriberry a écrit : This no longer works on 2.6.35 (black screen after starting X). Could be https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16496 ? Reverting that patch (or, more accurately, just deleting the redundant backlight_off call)

Re: [Intel-gfx] how get drm-intel-next into a stable kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 12:47 -0700, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: So now it's just the suspend issue. Same behavior as 2.6.34: when resuming, the display is off, and switching VTs, etc., won't turn it on. What does work, if I type very carefully, is hibernating and then resuming. Suspend

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Enable aspect/centering panel fitting for Ironlake.

2010-08-05 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2010.08.05 11:25:26 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: v2: Hook in DP paths to keep FULLSCREEN panel fitting on eDP. Looks fine to me. Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang zhen...@linux.intel.com -- Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827