Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC PKS/PMEM 57/58] nvdimm/pmem: Stray access protection for pmem->virt_addr

lumsy API design to *disable*, right?). And there is no hint about the scope. And it *could* be so much more readable like this: dev_access_enable(DEV_ACCESS_THIS_THREAD); thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freed

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mm: Skip opportunistic reclaim for dma pinned pages

ugh. And I *think* it's actually safe to do this, as it stays away from writeback or other filesystem activity. But let me double check that, in case I'm forgetting something. thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mm: Skip opportunistic reclaim for dma pinned pages

t/lists/linux-mm/msg142700.html thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/gup, drm/i915: refactor gup_fast, convert to pin_user_pages()

On 2020-05-23 02:41, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting John Hubbard (2020-05-22 06:19:27) The purpose of posting this series is to launch a test in the intel-gfx-ci tree. (The patches have already been merged into Andrew's linux-mm tree.) This applies to today's linux.git (note the base-commit tag

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/gup: introduce pin_user_pages_fast_only()

This is the FOLL_PIN equivalent of __get_user_pages_fast(), except with a more descriptive name, and gup_flags instead of a boolean "write" in the argument list. Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- include/linux/mm.h | 2 ++ mm/gup.c | 36 +++

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/gup, drm/i915: refactor gup_fast, convert to pin_user_pages()

to change the name as well, to whatever the consensus is. My initial recommendation is: get_user_pages_fast_only(), to match the new pin_user_pages_only(). John Hubbard (4): mm/gup: move __get_user_pages_fast() down a few lines in gup.c mm/gup: refactor and de-duplicate gup_fast() code mm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] mm/gup, drm/i915: refactor gup_fast, convert to pin_user_pages()

on the latest linux-next (which has my changes now). Should be fine. And in fact it would be nice to get that done in this round, so that the pin* and get* APIs look the same. thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/gup: move __get_user_pages_fast() down a few lines in gup.c

This is in order to avoid a forward declaration of internal_get_user_pages_fast(), in the next patch. This is code movement only--all generated code should be identical. Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- mm/gup.c | 112 +++ 1 file changed, 56

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/gup: refactor and de-duplicate gup_fast() code

f enabling interrupts was fragile at best. Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- include/linux/mm.h | 1 + mm/gup.c | 63 ++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index a5

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mm/gup: fixup gup.c for "mm/gup: refactor and de-duplicate gup_fast() code"

ko Ursulin Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- Hi Andrew, Chris, Andrew: This is a fixup that applies to today's (20200521) linux-next. In that tree, this fixes up: commit dfb8dfe80808 ("mm/gup: refactor and de-duplicate gup_fast() code") Chris: I'd like to request another CI run for the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mm/gup: fixup gup.c for "mm/gup: refactor and de-duplicate gup_fast() code"

On 2020-05-21 19:46, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting John Hubbard (2020-05-22 00:38:41) Include FOLL_FAST_ONLY in the list of flags to *not* WARN() on, in internal_get_user_pages_fast(). Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: David Airlie Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: "Joonas Lahtinen" Cc: Ma

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages()

basically, this is a small part of fixing a long-standing disconnect between pinning pages, and file systems' use of those pages. [1] Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst [2] "Explicit pinning of user-space pages": https://lwn.net/Articles/807108/ Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- driv

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] mm/gup, drm/i915: refactor gup_fast, convert to pin_user_pages()

On 2020-05-21 11:57, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting John Hubbard (2020-05-19 01:21:20) This needs to go through Andrew's -mm tree, due to adding a new gup.c routine. However, I would really love to have some testing from the drm/i915 folks, because I haven't been able to run-time test that part

[Intel-gfx] Solved: [PATCH 0/4] mm/gup, drm/i915: refactor gup_fast, convert to pin_user_pages()

On 2020-05-21 12:11, John Hubbard wrote: On 2020-05-21 11:57, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting John Hubbard (2020-05-19 01:21:20) This needs to go through Andrew's -mm tree, due to adding a new gup.c routine. However, I would really love to have some testing from the drm/i915 folks, because I

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] mm/gup: refactor and de-duplicate gup_fast() code

f enabling interrupts was fragile at best. Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- include/linux/mm.h | 1 + mm/gup.c | 60 ++ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index a5

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] mm/gup: introduce pin_user_pages_fast_only()

This is the FOLL_PIN equivalent of __get_user_pages_fast(), except with a more descriptive name, and gup_flags instead of a boolean "write" in the argument list. Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- include/linux/mm.h | 2 ++ mm/gup.c | 36 +++

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages()

basically, this is a small part of fixing a long-standing disconnect between pinning pages, and file systems' use of those pages. [1] Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst [2] "Explicit pinning of user-space pages": https://lwn.net/Articles/807108/ Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- driv

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] mm/gup: move __get_user_pages_fast() down a few lines in gup.c

This is in order to avoid a forward declaration of internal_get_user_pages_fast(), in the next patch. This is code movement only--all generated code should be identical. Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- mm/gup.c | 112 +++ 1 file changed, 56

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] mm/gup, drm/i915: refactor gup_fast, convert to pin_user_pages()

arg. Also, if this series looks good, we can ask Souptick to change the name as well, to whatever the consensus is. My initial recommendation is: get_user_pages_fast_only(), to match the new pin_user_pages_only(). John Hubbard (4): mm/gup: move __get_user_pages_fast() down a few lines

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH hmm v2 5/5] mm/hmm: remove the customizable pfn format from hmm_range_fault

return 0; - return pmd_write(pmd) ? range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID] | - range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE] : - range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]; + return pmd_write(pmd) ? (HMM_PFN_VALID | HMM_PFN_WRITE) : HMM_PFN_VALID; I

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH hmm v2 4/5] mm/hmm: remove HMM_PFN_SPECIAL

On 2020-05-01 11:20, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: From: Jason Gunthorpe This is just an alias for HMM_PFN_ERROR, nothing cares that the error was because of a special page vs any other error case. Reviewed-by: John Hubbard thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA Acked-by: Felix Kuehling Reviewed

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH hmm v2 2/5] mm/hmm: make hmm_range_fault return 0 or -1

ill at their input * values. */ Either way, Reviewed-by: John Hubbard thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA } while (ret == -EBUSY); - - if (ret) - return ret; - return (hmm_vma_walk.last - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + retu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH hmm v2 1/5] mm/hmm: make CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE into a select

On 2020-05-01 11:20, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: From: Jason Gunthorpe There is no reason for a user to select this or not directly - it should be selected by drivers that are going to use the feature, similar to how CONFIG_HMM_MIRROR works. Yes, this is a nice touch. Reviewed-by: John Hubbard

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/39] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites

need follow-on changes to, one way or another, set FOLL_PIN. d) And of course a few sites whose patches get dropped, as mentioned above. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190821040727.19650-3-jhubb...@nvidia.com thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/41] drm/etnaviv: convert release_pages() to put_user_pages()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 41/41] mm/ksm: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/34] drm/radeon: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/39] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites

On 8/6/19 6:32 PM, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote: > From: John Hubbard > ... > > John Hubbard (38): > mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to put_user_pages_dirty_lock() ... > 54 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 323 deletions(-) > ahem, yes, apparently this is what happens if I ad

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 26/41] futex: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 03/41] net/xdp: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/34] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites

On 8/8/19 9:25 AM, Weiny, Ira wrote: >> >> On 8/7/19 7:36 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:46:49AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >>>> On Wed 07-08-19 10:37:26, Jan Kara wrote: >>>>> On Fri 02-08-19 12:14:09, John Hubbard

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 17/41] staging/vc04_services: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/34] fbdev/pvr2fb: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/34] vfio: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 12/41] genwqe: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/34] drm/i915: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

On 8/2/19 11:48 AM, John Hubbard wrote: > On 8/2/19 2:19 AM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: >> Quoting john.hubb...@gmail.com (2019-08-02 05:19:37) >>> From: John Hubbard ... > In order to deal with the merge problem, I'll drop this patch from my series, > and I'd recommend that

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 31/34] fs/nfs: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/34] vfio: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/34] drm/etnaviv: convert release_pages() to put_user_pages()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 21/41] fsl_hypervisor: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 27/41] mm/frame_vector.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 20/41] fbdev/pvr2fb: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 32/41] crypt: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/41] net/ceph: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/34] drm/i915: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/34] drm/i915: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

On 8/2/19 2:19 AM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: Quoting john.hubb...@gmail.com (2019-08-02 05:19:37) From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/34] media/v4l2-core/mm: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/34] media/ivtv: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 29/41] mm/memory.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 38/41] powerpc: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

k you need that initialisation do you? > Nope, it can go. Fixed locally, thanks. Did you get a chance to look at enough of the other bits to feel comfortable with the patch, overall? thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/34] genwqe: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/41] drm/radeon: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/34] vmci: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/41] drm/i915: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 36/41] fs/binfmt_elf: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

older versions"). get_dump_page calls get_user_page so put_user_page must be used to match. Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- fs/binfmt_elf.c | 2 +- fs/binfmt_elf_fdpic.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/binfmt_

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 19/41] vfio: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 18/41] drivers/tee: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 33/41] fs/nfs: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/34] x86/kvm: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions&q

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 31/41] mm/process_vm_access.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/34] mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to put_user_pages_dirty_lock()

From: John Hubbard Provide a more capable variation of put_user_pages_dirty_lock(), and delete put_user_pages_dirty(). This is based on the following: 1. Lots of call sites become simpler if a bool is passed into put_user_page*(), instead of making the call site choose which put_user_page

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/34] mm/process_vm_access.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/34] mm/gup_benchmark.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 27/34] mm/memory.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/34] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites

On 8/1/19 7:16 PM, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote: > From: John Hubbard > > Hi, > > These are best characterized as miscellaneous conversions: many (not all) > call sites that don't involve biovec or iov_iter, nor mm/. It also leaves > out a few call sites that r

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 15/41] rapidio: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 26/34] mm/gup_benchmark.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/34] mm/memory.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/34] fsl_hypervisor: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/34] mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to put_user_pages_dirty_lock()

On 8/6/19 10:39 AM, Ira Weiny wrote: > On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 03:48:42PM -0700, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote: >> From: John Hubbard ... >> - >> /** >> - * put_user_pages_dirty() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages >> - * @pages: array of page

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/34] orangefs: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/34] xen: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/34] rapidio: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 10/41] media/ivtv: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/34] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites

tually did the pinning. This is all heading toward marking pages as pinned, so we should finally get there. I'll post the RFC for tracking pinned pages shortly. thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/34] goldfish_pipe: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/34] net/rds: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 39/41] mm/mlock.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/34] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites

On 8/7/19 7:36 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:46:49AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: On Wed 07-08-19 10:37:26, Jan Kara wrote: On Fri 02-08-19 12:14:09, John Hubbard wrote: On 8/2/19 7:52 AM, Jan Kara wrote: On Fri 02-08-19 07:24:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Fri, Aug 02, 2019

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 16/41] oradax: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/41] x86/kvm: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions&q

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/41] scif: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 35/41] kernel/events/core.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/34] media/ivtv: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/34] drm/i915: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/34] net/ceph: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 23/41] fs/exec.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 23/34] uprobes: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/34] xen: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

On 8/1/19 9:36 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: On 02.08.19 04:19, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote: From: John Hubbard ... diff --git a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c index 2f5ce7230a43..29e461dbee2d 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c +++ b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c @@ -611,15 +611,10

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 34/41] goldfish_pipe: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/34] drivers/tee: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/34] fbdev/pvr2fb: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 21/34] fs/exec.c: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 24/34] futex: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/41] net/rds: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 37/41] security/tomoyo: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/34] drm/radeon: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/34] xen: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 22/34] orangefs: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/34] nfs: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

From: John Hubbard For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeh

  1   2   >