Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.12.902

2010-09-29 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 05:53:53 Carl Worth wrote: This is the second release candidate in preparation for the upcoming 2.13.0 release. This comes exactly one week after 2.12.902 and includes only a handful of changes. One significant change is that the driver now requires libdrm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.12.901 (2.13 rc1)

2010-09-25 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday 22 September 2010 13:26:24 Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: intel_display.c: In function ‘intel_output_get_modes’: intel_display.c:827:33: error: ‘DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP’ undeclared (first use in this function) intel_display.c:827:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.12.901 (2.13 rc1)

2010-09-22 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday 22 September 2010 02:48:32 Carl Worth wrote: This is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming 2.13.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from testing of this snapshot. Can't build it: intel_display.c: In function ‘intel_output_get_modes’:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-19 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday June 18 2010 22:04:50 Jesse Barnes wrote: Ok here are some updated ones. Already tried the patches. Now they both apply correctly on kernel 2.6.35-rc3. However, this is what I find on the Xorg.0.log: [ 463.790] (EE) intel(0): Detected a hung GPU, disabling acceleration. If I try

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-17 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday June 18 2010 02:17:53 Andrew Lutomirski wrote: Neither patch applies for me. One of them do apply for me, the other one doesn't. Testing done on latest 2.6.35-rc3, the building fails. Regards -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-16 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday June 16 2010 10:45:34 Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: Anyway, I will try to bisect today and report back :) Well, I tried. Does this message: Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) [29ba8a84f7cf5c29a5f38688a1ac0ccf41d8e4ec] XvMC: everyone's using execbuffer

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-16 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday June 16 2010 15:57:41 Chris Wilson wrote: One more step. Test that commit and tell git bisect (good|bad) and it will print a slightly more verbose statement of which commit is triggering the freeze. Sometimes I amaze myself :S It clearly says *after* this. I'll do that tonight

Re: [Intel-gfx] Working out if my driver is borked ?

2010-06-04 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday June 4 2010 18:05:50 Saner wrote: Hiya, I have been trying to work out if my laptop is under-performing graphically all day, I have managed to push an extra 200fps on glxgears, but I am trying to work out if this is normal for my card (it seems low to be honest), but I want to

Re: [Intel-gfx] Does xf86-video-intel 2.11.0 support interlace? Lucid 2.6.33

2010-06-03 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Monday May 31 2010 21:08:15 Xavier de Almeida wrote: Hello, It's my first post in such mailing list. My issue is that I can't configure my old LCD supporting 1080i (interlace mode) with my Clarkdale i3 (h57) HD Graphics. Is it a known bug?

[Intel-gfx] Can't get 1920x1080 on TTY anymore and fullscreen freezes

2010-05-24 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
I've recently upgraded my Archlinux system to the kernel 2.6.34, libdrm 2.4.20, intel 2.11.0 xorg-server 1.8.1 RC and now I'm no longer able to get 1920x1080 on the tty and I'm stuck with 1280x800 (which is the LCDs default resolution but not my external monitor's). Furthermore, the X window