Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.12.902
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 05:53:53 Carl Worth wrote: This is the second release candidate in preparation for the upcoming 2.13.0 release. This comes exactly one week after 2.12.902 and includes only a handful of changes. One significant change is that the driver now requires libdrm 2.4.22 (or newer), as several people reported compilation failures of xf86-video-intel 2.12.901 with libdrm 2.4.21. Compiled fine here on libdrm2.4.22 :) Other changes include a fix to compile for the 1.6 series X server, a fix to retry framebuffer allocation after an initial failure, and a fix to disable dri2 after fallbacks are forced on. Got some errors though: Xorg.log reports: (EE) intel(0): Failed to submit batch buffer, expect rendering corruption or even a frozen display: Bad file descriptor. Dmesg: [drm:i915_gem_do_execbuffer] *ERROR* Object c49c0600 appears more than once in object list It seems to run fine except for the KDE4 effects which do not work correctly (as it also happened on the 901) Anywhere else I can get more information that would be usefull for you developers? Regards ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.12.901 (2.13 rc1)
On Wednesday 22 September 2010 13:26:24 Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: intel_display.c: In function ‘intel_output_get_modes’: intel_display.c:827:33: error: ‘DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP’ undeclared (first use in this function) intel_display.c:827:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in intel_display.c: In function ‘intel_output_init’: intel_display.c:1297:33: error: ‘DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP’ undeclared (first use in this function) I've commented out those lines as suggested by Clemens Eisser and it builded fine then. I've been on this drivers for some hours now and it seems stable although KDE effects don't work properly (maybe it's due to the removing of the mentioned lines...) I need no longer the page-flipping patch archlinux applies to the drivers for stability and my desktop seems more responsive as well as the flash videos. Improving at every release as usual Thanks guys! Regards ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.12.901 (2.13 rc1)
On Wednesday 22 September 2010 02:48:32 Carl Worth wrote: This is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming 2.13.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from testing of this snapshot. Can't build it: intel_display.c: In function ‘intel_output_get_modes’: intel_display.c:827:33: error: ‘DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP’ undeclared (first use in this function) intel_display.c:827:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in intel_display.c: In function ‘intel_output_init’: intel_display.c:1297:33: error: ‘DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP’ undeclared (first use in this function) Contact me if you need anything. Regards PS: I apologize as I've sent this message twice from a different account. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901
On Friday June 18 2010 22:04:50 Jesse Barnes wrote: Ok here are some updated ones. Already tried the patches. Now they both apply correctly on kernel 2.6.35-rc3. However, this is what I find on the Xorg.0.log: [ 463.790] (EE) intel(0): Detected a hung GPU, disabling acceleration. If I try to run glxgears the X window system crashes. This happens with both 2.11.0 and with 2.11.901RC However, I'm trying right now the kernel 2.6.35-rc3 with the 2.11.901 RC and, for now, it seems stable (I still get corruption if I try to rotate the screen as well as in some KDE menus). Regards -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901
On Friday June 18 2010 02:17:53 Andrew Lutomirski wrote: Neither patch applies for me. One of them do apply for me, the other one doesn't. Testing done on latest 2.6.35-rc3, the building fails. Regards -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901
On Wednesday June 16 2010 10:45:34 Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: Anyway, I will try to bisect today and report back :) Well, I tried. Does this message: Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) [29ba8a84f7cf5c29a5f38688a1ac0ccf41d8e4ec] XvMC: everyone's using execbuffer! mean I finished the process? Did that help? Regards -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901
On Wednesday June 16 2010 15:57:41 Chris Wilson wrote:
One more step. Test that commit and tell git bisect (good|bad) and it will
print a slightly more verbose statement of which commit is triggering the
freeze.
Sometimes I amaze myself :S It clearly says *after* this.
I'll do that tonight
However, I have to comment that the system has been stable with the 2.12RC for
two hours after applying this patch from my distribution (Archlinux):
diff -up xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/drmmode_display.c.no-flip xf86-video-
intel-2.11.0/src/drmmode_display.c
--- xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/drmmode_display.c.no-flip 2010-05-03
15:30:19.0 -0400
+++ xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/drmmode_display.c 2010-05-03
15:30:59.0 -0400
@@ -1504,10 +1504,15 @@ Bool drmmode_pre_init(ScrnInfoPtr scrn,
gp.value = has_flipping;
(void)drmCommandWriteRead(intel-drmSubFD, DRM_I915_GETPARAM, gp,
sizeof(gp));
+
+xf86DrvMsg(scrn-scrnIndex, X_INFO,
+ Pageflipping %s in kernel, %s disabled in X\n,
+ has_flipping ? enabled : disabled,
+ has_flipping ? but : and);
if (has_flipping) {
xf86DrvMsg(scrn-scrnIndex, X_INFO,
- Kernel page flipping support detected, enabling\n);
- intel-use_pageflipping = TRUE;
+ Don't panic: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/588421\n;);
+ intel-use_pageflipping = FALSE;
drmmode-flip_count = 0;
drmmode-event_context.version = DRM_EVENT_CONTEXT_VERSION;
drmmode-event_context.vblank_handler = drmmode_vblank_handler;
diff -up xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/i830_dri.c.no-flip xf86-video-
intel-2.11.0/src/i830_dri.c
--- xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/i830_dri.c.no-flip 2010-03-29
14:23:02.0 -0400
+++ xf86-video-intel-2.11.0/src/i830_dri.c 2010-05-03 15:30:19.0
-0400
@@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ Bool I830DRI2ScreenInit(ScreenPtr screen
info.CopyRegion = I830DRI2CopyRegion;
#if DRI2INFOREC_VERSION = 4
- if (intel-use_pageflipping) {
+ if (intel-use_pageflipping || 1) {
info.version = 4;
info.ScheduleSwap = I830DRI2ScheduleSwap;
info.GetMSC = I830DRI2GetMSC;
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] Working out if my driver is borked ?
On Friday June 4 2010 18:05:50 Saner wrote: Hiya, I have been trying to work out if my laptop is under-performing graphically all day, I have managed to push an extra 200fps on glxgears, but I am trying to work out if this is normal for my card (it seems low to be honest), but I want to find out before I start breaking things. My card is a Intel GM45, and I (think) I have the latest driver installed (and the latest stable mesa3d driver) Latest? for your distro? from git? From the official packages? ;) glxgears seems low 3677 frames in 5.0 seconds = 735.353 FPS 3304 frames in 5.0 seconds = 660.754 FPS 3155 frames in 5.0 seconds = 630.804 FPS It is well known glxgears is *not* a suitable benchmark. Don't base your perception on those results. However, I will quote www.phoroniix.com: The Intel Linux graphics driver is simply not in a state to perform well with 3D acceleration atop its Mesa driver. The 3D performance is *terrible* on my 945GM even though it has improved a lot in the last year. It seems there have been many improvements in the 2.12 version of the driver as well as the DRI2 implementation in the Xorg server... By the way: keep up the good work developers! -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] Does xf86-video-intel 2.11.0 support interlace? Lucid 2.6.33
On Monday May 31 2010 21:08:15 Xavier de Almeida wrote: Hello, It's my first post in such mailing list. My issue is that I can't configure my old LCD supporting 1080i (interlace mode) with my Clarkdale i3 (h57) HD Graphics. Is it a known bug? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27285 -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] Can't get 1920x1080 on TTY anymore and fullscreen freezes
I've recently upgraded my Archlinux system to the kernel 2.6.34, libdrm 2.4.20, intel 2.11.0 xorg-server 1.8.1 RC and now I'm no longer able to get 1920x1080 on the tty and I'm stuck with 1280x800 (which is the LCDs default resolution but not my external monitor's). Furthermore, the X window system defaults to 1280x800 as well (didn't behave like that before) and have to change the ressolution everytime I login. Any suggestions to solve this issue? I'd like to report too that my system freezes every time I run a flash video at fullscreen or a regular video while having compiz enabled. Should I fill in a bug report? Best regards and thanks in advance for your help! Damnshock -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
