Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] gem_busy: Remove from android builds without cairo

, 2016 2:47 PM To: Gore, Tim <tim.g...@intel.com>; Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] gem_busy: Remove from android builds without cairo On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:25:06PM +0300, Marius Vlad wrote: > @

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] gem_busy: Remove from android builds without cairo

> > >-Original Message- >From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] >Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 9:32 AM >To: Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com> >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] gem_busy: Remove

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] gem_largeobject: Fix for clang compiler

Bump, Can this be merged? It is a simple fix for an issue with the clang compiler. //Derek -Original Message- From: Morton, Derek J Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 3:37 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Gore, Tim <tim.g...@intel.com>; Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] benchmarks/, overlay/, demos/, tools/, tests/: Add Werror by default.

> > >-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On >Behalf Of Marius Vlad >Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 4:55 PM >To: Lespiau, Damien >Cc: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 5/6] tests/gem_scheduler: Add subtests to test batch priority behaviour

> > >-Original Message- >From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele >Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:58 AM >To: Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v3 5/6] tests/gem_scheduler: Add subtests to test

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/6] lib/intel_batchbuffer: Add functions to be used in the scheduler test

> > >-Original Message- >From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele >Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 12:16 PM >To: Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/6] lib/intel_batchbuffer: Add functions to be

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 1/6] ioctl_wrappers: make gem_has_ring non static

> >-Original Message- >From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele >Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 12:30 PM >To: Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v3 1/6] ioctl_wrappers: make gem_has_ring non static > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2 4/7] tests/gem_scheduler: Add gem_scheduler test

2<<13 constitute separate exec_id's? //Derek -Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 8:15 PM To: Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch Subject: Re: [Int

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/7] lib/ioctl_wrappers: Separate ring BSD1 from BSD2 checks

breaks other tests I will remove this patch and put the logic in the scheduler test. //Derek -Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 6:42 PM To: Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedeskt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] lib/igt_bb_factory: Add igt_bb_factory library

> > >-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Morton, Derek J >Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 10:31 AM >To: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>; >intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/4] tests/gem_scheduler: Add subtests to test batch priority behaviour

-Original Message- From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 1:10 PM To: Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/4] tests/gem_scheduler: Add subtests to test batch priority beh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/4] tests/gem_scheduler: Add gem_scheduler test

> > >-Original Message- >From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele >Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:37 PM >To: Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/4] tests/gem_scheduler: Add >gem_

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] lib/igt_bb_factory: Add igt_bb_factory library

> > >-Original Message- >From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele >Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:48 AM >To: Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] lib/igt_bb_factory: Add >igt_bb_f

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest functionality.

> > >-Original Message- >From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter >Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 11:10 PM >To: Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com> >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Gore, Tim <tim.g...

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest functionality.

> > >-Original Message- >From: Gordon, David S >Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 7:29 PM >To: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>; Morton, Derek J <derek.j.mor...@intel.com> >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Gore, Tim <tim.g...@intel.com>; >d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest functionality.

ernative I could add a new parameter --run-subtest-regex which allows the list of subtests to be run to be specified with a regex. Would that be acceptable? //Derek > > >-Original Message- >From: Gordon, David S >Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:58 PM >To

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest functionality.

> > >-Original Message- >From: Gordon, David S >Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 8:35 AM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Morton, Derek J; Ville Syrjälä >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest >functionality. > >On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest functionality.

> > >-Original Message- >From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter >Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 3:43 PM >To: Morton, Derek J >Cc: Daniel Vetter; Ville Syrjälä; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PAT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_exec_basic

> > >-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Chris Wilson >Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 1:11 PM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt: Add gem_exec_basic > >Extremely basic check that we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest functionality.

> >-Original Message- >From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter >Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 1:39 PM >To: Ville Syrjälä >Cc: Morton, Derek J; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest functionality.

> > >-Original Message- >From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:33 PM >To: Morton, Derek J >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest functionality.

> > >-Original Message- >From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:31 PM >To: Morton, Derek J >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Expand --run-subtest &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] tools/intel_residency: use setitimer instead of {, u}alarm

I verified this patch fixes the ualarm issue on android. I posted the patch [PATCH] tests/Android.mk: Make intel_residency CAIRO dependant Which adds this tool to the list that are cairo dependant in the android makefile. //Derek -Original Message- From: Intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tools/Android.mk: Add zlib support

Can this be merged so IGT on Android builds? No one has raise any objections since Monday about this patch. //Derek -Original Message- From: Morton, Derek J Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 1:32 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Wood, Thomas; Gore, Tim; ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 5/7] lib/debugfs: Read the crc frame counter as hex

> > >-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com >Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 8:16 PM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 5/7] lib/debugfs: Read the crc frame

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] gem_flink_race/prime_self_import: Improve test reliability

> > >-Original Message- >From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter >Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 5:06 PM >To: Morton, Derek J >Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PAT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] gem_flink_race/prime_self_import: Improve test reliability

> > >-Original Message- >From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter >Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 12:53 PM >To: Morton, Derek J >Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PAT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests: update .gitignore and add a Makefile rule to create it

> > >-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Daniel Vetter >Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:07 AM >To: Wood, Thomas >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests: update .gitignore and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] gem_flink_race/prime_self_import: Improve test reliability

> > >-Original Message- >From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter >Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 10:13 AM >To: Morton, Derek J >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PAT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: add exit value constants for shell script tests

1 comment / question inline, otherwise looks ok to me. //Derek > > >-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Thomas Wood >Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 11:31 AM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/drm_lib.sh: Skip when i915 debugfs wasn't found

> > >-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Thomas Wood >Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 10:08 AM >To: Daniel Vetter >Cc: Intel Graphics Development >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/drm_lib.sh: Skip when i915

Re: [Intel-gfx] i-g-t/libdrm email tagging & patchwork

You can put a .gitconfig file in the repository but the user needs to manually include it in the local gitconfig http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18329621/storing-git-config-as-part-of-the-repository A script could be included as well to automate as much as possible the process of including

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib: add a environment variable to control output

Hi Thomas, I have ran with your patches on android. The IGT_PLAIN_OUTPUT environment variable works fine for me. My only comment would be that it should be documented somewhere. I will remove the formatting change from my gem_exec_nop patch as with this I don't think it is needed. //Derek

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/8] lib: highlight subtest results on terminals

Hi Thomas, This causes all the formatting characters to appear in our logs on Android. The problem I think is because the ADB connection to the device is always seen as a terminal and any redirection to log files is being done on the host. Would it be possible to add a command line option to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_exec_nop: Improved test run time

> > >-Original Message- >From: Tvrtko Ursulin [mailto:tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com] >Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 2:34 PM >To: Chris Wilson; Morton, Derek J; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, >Thomas; Gore, Tim >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_exec_nop: Improved test run time

> > >-Original Message- >From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] >Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 1:55 PM >To: Morton, Derek J >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas; Gore, Tim >Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_exec_nop: Improved test

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_exec_nop: Improved test run time

> > >-Original Message- >From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] >Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 4:40 PM >To: Morton, Derek J >Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas; Gore, Tim >Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_exec_nop: Improved test

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: Add gem_exec_nop_concurrent test

> >On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:00:42PM +0100, Thomas Wood wrote: >> On 15 October 2015 at 09:05, Derek Morton wrote: >> > This test is based on gem_exec_nop but submits nop batch buffers >> > concurrently from different threads to check for ring hangs and >> > other

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] core_prop_blob ioctl_wrappers: Fix new tests/benchmarks for android

>Hi, > >On 13 October 2015 at 16:35, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> +void igt_require_propblob(int fd) >>> +{ >>> + struct local_drm_mode_create_blob c; >>> + struct local_drm_mode_destroy_blob d; >>> + uint32_t blob_data; >>> + c.data = _data; >>> + c.length =

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC i-g-t] Deciding on #!/bin/bash or #!/bin/sh

Hi Joonas, On android /bin does not exist. It is /system/bin/sh (there is no /system/bin/bash) so the script needs to be executed specifying the shell to override the shebang anyway. e.g. '/system/bin/sh script.sh' Currently the script type tests are not run on android as the build system does

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 2/8] lib/igt_core: Add igt_assert_fd

> > >-Original Message- >From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Daniel Vetter >Sent: Friday, October 2, 2015 9:02 AM >To: Daniel Stone >Cc: Vetter, Daniel; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 2/8]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/tests: explicitly raise SIGSEGV

This relies on signal.h being included by wait.h. Would it be better to include it explicitly? -Original Message- From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Wood Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:30 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tools/Android.mk: Fix compile error in intel_reg.c

-Original Message- From: Thomas Wood [mailto:thomas.w...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 2:48 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: Intel Graphics Development Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tools/Android.mk: Fix compile error in intel_reg.c > >On 9 September 2015 at 14:30, Derek

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] benckmarks/Android.mk: Fix building benchmarks for Android

This is the same as the previously sent patch but with Signed-off-by added to the commit message. //Derek -Original Message- From: Morton, Derek J Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 10:51 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Wood, Thomas; Gore, Tim; ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk; Morton

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] benchmarks/Android.mk, tools/Android.mk: Fix android build error

I will submit another patch. //Derek -Original Message- From: Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 5:00 PM To: Morton, Derek J; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] benchmarks/Android.mk, tools/Android.mk: Fix

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] benchmarks/Android.mk, tools/Android.mk: Fix android build error

Bump. Can this be merged? It only affects android and addresses an issue causing igt to fail to build at all on android. //Derek -Original Message- From: Morton, Derek J Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 11:31 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Wood, Thomas; Gore, Tim; Morton, Derek

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_render_linear_blits: Increase min swap required

-Original Message- From: Gordon, David S Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:15 PM To: Chris Wilson; Gore, Tim; Morton, Derek J; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_render_linear_blits: Increase min swap required On 29/07/15 14

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_render_linear_blits: Increase min swap required

-Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 9:54 AM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_render_linear_blits: Increase min swap required On Wed

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tools/Makefile.sources: fix igt_stats complie error on android

Found a simpler way of doing this using 'LOCAL_MODULE'. Will prepare a replacement patch. //Derek -Original Message- From: Morton, Derek J Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 1:59 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Wood, Thomas; Gore, Tim; Morton, Derek J Subject: [PATCH i-g-t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] benchmark/: fix gem_exec_nop complie error on android

-Original Message- From: Thomas Wood [mailto:thomas.w...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 4:33 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: Intel Graphics Development; Gore, Tim Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v2] benchmark/: fix gem_exec_nop complie error on android On 24 July 2015 at 14:35, Derek

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android

-Original Message- From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:54 AM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: Wood, Thomas; Intel Graphics Development Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android

-Original Message- From: Morton, Derek J Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 9:44 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Wood, Thomas; Morton, Derek J Subject: [PATCH i-g-t v3] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android Disable the tools / demo code that do not currently

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android

-Original Message- From: Thomas Wood [mailto:thomas.w...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 3:18 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: Intel Graphics Development Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v3] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android On 17 July 2015 at 10:15, Derek Morton

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android

in the meantime. //Derek -Original Message- From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Morton, Derek J Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 11:04 AM To: Jani Nikula; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] Android.mk

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tools/Android.mk: add any extra program sources

Hi Thomas, I tried these patches on Android. They worked with some modifications. See comments below. //Derek -Original Message- From: Wood, Thomas Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:08 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Morton, Derek J Subject: [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tools

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_fence_thrash.c: Reduce memory usage

-Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 4:08 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_fence_thrash.c: Reduce memory usage On Tue, Jun 23, 2015

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v5] libs/igt_core.c: Fix compile warnings in igt_core.c

-Original Message- From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 3:39 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v5] libs/igt_core.c: Fix compile warnings

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android

-Original Message- From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 4:31 PM To: Morton, Derek J; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android On Mon

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android

-Original Message- From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:24 PM To: Morton, Derek J; Wood, Thomas Cc: Intel Graphics Development Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android On Mon, 15 Jun

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android

-Original Message- From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:43 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: Wood, Thomas; Intel Graphics Development Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android

-Original Message- From: Thomas Wood [mailto:thomas.w...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:09 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: Intel Graphics Development; Gore, Tim Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] Android.mk: Disable tools that do not build for android On 15 June 2015 at 14:04, Derek

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v4] lib/tests/igt_segfault Add unit test to test segfault handling

-Original Message- From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:55 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas; dan...@ffwll.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v4] lib/tests/igt_segfault Add unit test

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v4] lib/tests/igt_segfault Add unit test to test segfault handling

This is the same as the previously submitted patch except the text encoding should (hopefully) now be correct. //Derek -Original Message- From: Morton, Derek J Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 11:05 AM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Wood, Thomas; dan...@ffwll.ch; Morton, Derek J

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] lib/tests/igt_segfault.c Add unit test to test segfault handling

-Original Message- From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:05 AM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] lib/tests/igt_segfault.c Add unit test

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v4] lib/tests/igt_segfault Add unit test to test segfault handling

-Original Message- From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 1:53 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas; dan...@ffwll.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v4] lib/tests/igt_segfault Add unit test

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] lib/tests/igt_segfault.c Add unit test to test segfault handling

-Original Message- From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 1:20 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] lib/tests/igt_segfault.c Add unit test

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/tests/igt_segfault.c Add unit test to test segfault handling

-Original Message- From: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 4:27 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx; Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/tests/igt_segfault.c Add unit test to test segfault

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] libs/igt_core.c: Fix compile warnings in igt_core.c

-Original Message- From: Morton, Derek J Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 12:21 PM To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Wood, Thomas; Gore, Tim; Morton, Derek J Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] libs/igt_core.c: Fix compile warnings in igt_core.c Fixed variables incorrectly

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib/igt_core.c: Flag the test as failing after a segfault

I will take a look and submit a test as a separate patch. //Derek -Original Message- From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 4:14 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [Intel

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/Android.mk: Treat all KMS tests as Cairo dependent

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:24:55AM +0100, Derek Morton wrote: If ANDROID_HAS_CAIRO is not set, automatically add all kms tests to the skip_tests_list. Building for android currently fails due to the addition of new kms tests. Rather than just adding the new tests to the exclusion list,