Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Extract intel_frontbuffer active tracking

2019-08-15 Thread Matthew Auld
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 10:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Move the active tracking for the frontbuffer operations out of the > i915_gem_object and into its own first class (refcounted) object. In the > process of detangling, we switch from low level request tracking to the > easier i915_active --

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Extract intel_frontbuffer active tracking

2019-08-14 Thread Chris Wilson
Move the active tracking for the frontbuffer operations out of the i915_gem_object and into its own first class (refcounted) object. In the process of detangling, we switch from low level request tracking to the easier i915_active -- with the plan that this avoids any potential atomic callbacks as