> -Original Message-
> From: Ville Syrjälä
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 11:58 PM
> To: Kahola, Mika
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Hogander, Jouni
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/mtl: Use int for entry setup frames
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:37:37AM +0200, Mika
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:37:37AM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> At least one TGL had regression when using u8 types
> for entry setup frames calculation. So, let's switch
> to use ints instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file
> -Original Message-
> From: Hajda, Andrzej
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 12:22 PM
> To: Kahola, Mika ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mtl: Use int for entry setup frames
>
> On 13.11.2023 10:37, Mika Kahola wrote:
On 13.11.2023 10:37, Mika Kahola wrote:
At least one TGL had regression when using u8 types
for entry setup frames calculation. So, let's switch
to use ints instead.
This explanation is missing the most important part - why int?
I guess it is because intel_psr_entry_setup_frames can return
On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 11:37 +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> At least one TGL had regression when using u8 types
> for entry setup frames calculation. So, let's switch
> to use ints instead.
I think you need to add Fixes tag here? With this change:
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander
>
> Signed-off-by:
At least one TGL had regression when using u8 types
for entry setup frames calculation. So, let's switch
to use ints instead.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
