Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Clear execlist port[] before updating seqno on wedging

Chris Wilson writes: > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2017-07-20 14:31:31) >> Chris Wilson writes: >> >> > When we wedge the device, we clear out the in-flight requests and >> > advance the breadcrumb to indicate they are complete. However, the >> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Clear execlist port[] before updating seqno on wedging

Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2017-07-20 14:31:31) > Chris Wilson writes: > > > When we wedge the device, we clear out the in-flight requests and > > advance the breadcrumb to indicate they are complete. However, the > > breadcrumb advance includes an assert that the engine is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Clear execlist port[] before updating seqno on wedging

Chris Wilson writes: > When we wedge the device, we clear out the in-flight requests and > advance the breadcrumb to indicate they are complete. However, the > breadcrumb advance includes an assert that the engine is idle, so that > advancement needs to be the last step

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Clear execlist port[] before updating seqno on wedging

When we wedge the device, we clear out the in-flight requests and advance the breadcrumb to indicate they are complete. However, the breadcrumb advance includes an assert that the engine is idle, so that advancement needs to be the last step to ensure we pass our own sanity checks. Signed-off-by: