On 4/4/2023 3:03 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:11 AM Nautiyal, Ankit K
wrote:
On 3/29/2023 5:05 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:11 AM Nautiyal, Ankit K
wrote:
>
>
> On 3/29/2023 5:05 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> >> On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 3/29/2023 5:05 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 3/29/2023 3:27 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at
On 3/29/2023 7:14 PM, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:35:38PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:44:12PM +0300, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:35:38PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:35:38PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> >
> > On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> > >> On 3/29/2023 3:27 PM, Ville
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>
> On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> >> On 3/29/2023 3:27 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:14:49PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal
On 3/29/2023 4:23 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 3/29/2023 3:27 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:14:49PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
As per Bspec, Big Joiner BW check is:
Output bpp <= PPC * CDCLK frequency
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:21PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>
> On 3/29/2023 3:27 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:14:49PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> >> As per Bspec, Big Joiner BW check is:
> >> Output bpp <= PPC * CDCLK frequency * Big joiner interface bits /
>
On 3/29/2023 3:27 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:14:49PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
As per Bspec, Big Joiner BW check is:
Output bpp <= PPC * CDCLK frequency * Big joiner interface bits /
Pixel clock
Currently we always use max_cdclk in the check for both modevalid
and
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:14:49PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> As per Bspec, Big Joiner BW check is:
> Output bpp <= PPC * CDCLK frequency * Big joiner interface bits /
> Pixel clock
>
> Currently we always use max_cdclk in the check for both modevalid
> and compute config steps.
>
> During
As per Bspec, Big Joiner BW check is:
Output bpp <= PPC * CDCLK frequency * Big joiner interface bits /
Pixel clock
Currently we always use max_cdclk in the check for both modevalid
and compute config steps.
During modevalid use max_cdclk_freq for the check.
During compute config step use
12 matches
Mail list logo