On ke, 2016-10-12 at 12:16 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The current meaning of whether an object has a GGTT vma is very
> ill-defined (and note we don't check for any partials either), it just
> means that at some point it was in the GGTT but it may not be now. The
> information we really care abou
The current meaning of whether an object has a GGTT vma is very
ill-defined (and note we don't check for any partials either), it just
means that at some point it was in the GGTT but it may not be now. The
information we really care about here is whether it is taking up
precious mappable aperture s
