Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] intel-ci: Skip module reloads

2018-08-10 Thread Petri Latvala
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:21:59AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Petri Latvala (2018-08-10 10:11:29) > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:02:46AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Reloading the module may impact subsequent tests by destabilising the > > > system. As we do for BAT, if we want to tes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] intel-ci: Skip module reloads

2018-08-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Petri Latvala (2018-08-10 10:11:29) > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:02:46AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Reloading the module may impact subsequent tests by destabilising the > > system. As we do for BAT, if we want to test reloads, it should be > > handled explicitly at the end of the run,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] intel-ci: Skip module reloads

2018-08-10 Thread Petri Latvala
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:02:46AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Reloading the module may impact subsequent tests by destabilising the > system. As we do for BAT, if we want to test reloads, it should be > handled explicitly at the end of the run, rather than placed at random > in the middle of the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] intel-ci: Skip module reloads

2018-08-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Reloading the module may impact subsequent tests by destabilising the system. As we do for BAT, if we want to test reloads, it should be handled explicitly at the end of the run, rather than placed at random in the middle of the test list. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1