We should avoid using guc_log prefix for functions that don't
operate on GuC log, but rather request action from the GuC.
Better to use guc_action prefix.
v2: rebase + naming compromise
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
index 4cb422c..39928e6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
* registers value.
*/
-static int guc_log_flush_complete(struct intel_guc *guc)
+static int guc_action_flush_log_complete(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
u32 action[] = {
INTEL_GUC_ACTION_LOG_BUFFER_FILE_FLUSH_COMPLETE
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int guc_log_flush_complete(struct intel_guc *guc)
return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
}
-static int guc_log_flush(struct intel_guc *guc)
+static int guc_action_flush_log(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
u32 action[] = {
INTEL_GUC_ACTION_FORCE_LOG_BUFFER_FLUSH,
@@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ static int guc_log_flush(struct intel_guc *guc)
return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
}
-static int guc_log_control(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable,
- bool default_logging, u32 verbosity)
+static int guc_action_control_log(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable,
+ bool default_logging, u32 verbosity)
{
union guc_log_control control_val = {
{
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void guc_log_capture_logs(struct intel_guc_log *log)
* time, so get/put should be really quick.
*/
intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
- guc_log_flush_complete(guc);
+ guc_action_flush_log_complete(guc);
intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
}
@@ -527,9 +527,9 @@ int intel_guc_log_level_set(struct intel_guc_log *log, u64
val)
}
intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
- ret = guc_log_control(guc, GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSE(val),
- GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_ENABLED(val),
- GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSITY(val));
+ ret = guc_action_control_log(guc, GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSE(val),
+ GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_ENABLED(val),
+ GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSITY(val));
intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
if (ret) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("guc_log_control action failed %d\n", ret);
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ void intel_guc_log_relay_flush(struct intel_guc_log *log)
flush_work(&log->relay.flush_work);
intel_runtime_pm_get(i915);
- guc_log_flush(guc);
+ guc_action_flush_log(guc);
intel_runtime_pm_put(i915);
/* GuC would have updated log buffer by now, so capture it */
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
