Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-03-06 09:48:14)
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2018 23:21:21 +0100, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
> > static __always_inline void dup_param(const char *type, void *x)
> > @@ -1749,13 +1744,12 @@ static int capture(void *data)
> > capture_params(error);
> > capture_uc_state(e
On Mon, 05 Mar 2018 23:21:21 +0100, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
wrote:
some of the static functions used from capture() have the "i915_"
prefix while other don't; most of them take i915 as a parameter, but one
of them derives it internally from error->i915. Let's be consistent by
avoiding prefix f
Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2018-03-05 22:21:21)
> some of the static functions used from capture() have the "i915_"
> prefix while other don't; most of them take i915 as a parameter, but one
> of them derives it internally from error->i915. Let's be consistent by
> avoiding prefix for static f
On 3/5/2018 2:21 PM, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
some of the static functions used from capture() have the "i915_"
prefix while other don't; most of them take i915 as a parameter, but one
of them derives it internally from error->i915. Let's be consistent by
avoiding prefix for static functions
