Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2018-03-05 22:21:21)
> some of the static functions used from capture() have the "i915_"
> prefix while other don't; most of them take i915 as a parameter, but one
> of them derives it internally from error->i915. Let's be consistent by
> avoiding prefix for static functions and by getting i915 from
> error->i915. While at it, s/dev_priv/i915 in functions that don't
> perform register reads.
>
> v2: take i915 from error->i915 (Michal), s/dev_priv/i915,
> update commit message
>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
