Re: [Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1

2018-01-02 Thread Jani Nikula 
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Joonas Lahtinen  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
>
> Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
> backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
> be included in drm-intel-fixes, please backport them and send them as a
> REPLY TO THIS EMAIL before the END OF TODAY.
>
> The patches that failed to cherry-pick:
> 8cf80a2e4b31 ("drm/i915/gvt: Rename reserved ring buffer")
> f2880e04f3a5 ("drm/i915/gvt: Move request alloc to dispatch_workload path 
> only")
> 0cfecb7c4b9b ("Revert "drm/i915: Display WA #1133 WaFbcSkipSegments:cnl, 
> glk"")

Update for -rc6

f745e9cc7e40 ("drm/i915/gvt: Add missing breaks in switch statement")
4e889d62b89d ("drm/i915/gvt: Fix pipe A enable as default for vgpu")
53421c2fe99c ("drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl")

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1

2017-12-05 Thread Zhenyu Wang 
On 2017.12.05 17:02:34 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Dropping GVT folks that are not affected.
> 
> Keeping Zhenyu and Zhi as a heads-up, there's no need for GVT pull for this 
> rc?
>

I need to backport one from -next once it's pulled and it's done now.
I will send a fixes pull today.

thanks

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1

2017-12-05 Thread Joonas Lahtinen 
Dropping GVT folks that are not affected.

Keeping Zhenyu and Zhi as a heads-up, there's no need for GVT pull for this rc?

On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 10:54 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
> 
> Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
> backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
> be included in drm-intel-fixes, please backport them and send them as a
> REPLY TO THIS EMAIL before the END OF TODAY.



> 0cfecb7c4b9b ("Revert "drm/i915: Display WA #1133 WaFbcSkipSegments:cnl, 
> glk"")

This patch still fails to apply and I'm looking at -rc3 already.

Rodrigo and Radhakrishna, do we actually want to see the patch
backported?

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1

2017-11-28 Thread Zhenyu Wang 
On 2017.11.28 10:54:27 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
> 
> Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
> backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
> be included in drm-intel-fixes, please backport them and send them as a
> REPLY TO THIS EMAIL before the END OF TODAY.
> 
> The patches that failed to cherry-pick:
> 8cf80a2e4b31 ("drm/i915/gvt: Rename reserved ring buffer")

ignore this one.

> f2880e04f3a5 ("drm/i915/gvt: Move request alloc to dispatch_workload path 
> only")

Done in last gvt-fixes pull request, but seems that missed 4.15-rc1,
so will send new pull to include this.

thanks

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx