Hi,
I remember I had some problems, but these steps described in this building
script works for me at least:
https://github.com/ovilab/atomify/blob/dev/deploy/deploy_linux.sh
Anders
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:28 PM Jason H wrote:
> I'm trying to deploy a simple QtCore only binary.
> I put the
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 08:20:23 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 20.09.2018, 15:59, "Krzysztof Kawa" :
> > Hi,
> > I really hate to be "that guy" again, but I'd just like to know what's
> > going on.
> >
> > Some time ago I complained about bugs not being resolved for many
> > major
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 04:04, Krzysztof Kawa wrote:
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> > in practice most bug fixing is spent to make the
> > new features actually work. There is no point in adding features, if
> > they are not useable because of bugs.
>
> Funny you should say that. I actually wish this
On 09/15/2018 04:10 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 12:59:29 PDT maitai wrote:
I will add a stupid test, and if https does not work let's go for http.
Don't do that.
If you're not going to have security anyway, just disable security completely.
That way, all your
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 12. September 2018 20:50:18 CEST Fábián Kristóf - Szabolcs wrote:
> I want to implement animated showing/hiding (sliding in-out) of a
> QDockWidget, currently I have implemented this:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBkvHQrQBO0 In this video you can see that
> when I press the
On 09/20/2018 03:27 PM, Krzysztof Kawa wrote:
Hi,
I really hate to be "that guy" again, but I'd just like to know what's going on.
Some time ago I complained about bugs not being resolved for many
major releases. I was then told my reports were P2 or lower and I
can't expect them to be taken
On 09/10/2018 11:04 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
On Saturday, 8 September 2018 11:56:45 PDT Tomasz Olszak wrote:
So as well you can to it in runtime and don't need macro.
Better yet, don't do anything. Use the font that
Hi Krzysztof,
I would suggest to contact maintainer on IRC and ask if there is something
you can help with.
E.g I encountered QTBUG-70222, contacted Alex and in 20 minutes he guided
me how to provide data he needs to narrow down and fix the issue.
For some other bugs/features it was easier to
Christoph Feck wrote:
> in practice most bug fixing is spent to make the
> new features actually work. There is no point in adding features, if
> they are not useable because of bugs.
Funny you should say that. I actually wish this was true, but take a
look at the sad history of QTBUG-52108 for
I'm trying to deploy a simple QtCore only binary.
I put the lib in ~/lib ad set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /home/user/lib
ran it:
$ ./filefixer
./filefixer: /home/user/lib/libQt5Core.so.5: version `Qt_5.11' not found
(required by ./filefixer)
./filefixer: /home/user/lib/libQt5Core.so.5: version `Qt_5'
On 20.09.2018 14:59, Krzysztof Kawa wrote:
[...] If a new feature has
a bug I just don't start to use it, no problem, but if something
breaks after update I'd like to at least know I can skip a release and
wait for a fix.
While this makes sense, in practice most bug fixing is spent to make the
20.09.2018, 15:59, "Krzysztof Kawa" :
> Hi,
> I really hate to be "that guy" again, but I'd just like to know what's going
> on.
>
> Some time ago I complained about bugs not being resolved for many
> major releases. I was then told my reports were P2 or lower and I
> can't expect them to be
Hi,
I really hate to be "that guy" again, but I'd just like to know what's going on.
Some time ago I complained about bugs not being resolved for many
major releases. I was then told my reports were P2 or lower and I
can't expect them to be taken care of. That sucks for me but I can
understand to
I recommend you to use the data() / constData() API to reduce the risk of
mistakes.
I personaly used a similar class, but in my case, the API names are called
data() / mutableData()
because I wish even more hilight on state changes.
Philippe
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:19:47 +0200
Michal Lazo
Sorry
I just found, there will be just one detach.
but still I wasn't aware that it don't call cost variant.
So thx for that link http://eel.is/c++draft/over.match
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:15 PM Michal Lazo wrote:
> But for example
>
>
But for example
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/gui/text/qtextcursor.cpp#n1487
in this code I found at least 4 x detach
void QTextCursor::deleteChar()
{
if (!d || !d->priv)1x detach
return;
if (d->position != d->anchor)2x detach removeSelectedText();
return; }
{
if
On 20/09/18 12:43, Michal Lazo wrote:
"So my whole C++ world just changed."
Can you point me to right article in C++ documentation ?
http://eel.is/c++draft/over.match
See in particular [over.match.funcs] §11.3.1.4 , and then you need to
reason about the implications for the overload
"So my whole C++ world just changed."
Can you point me to right article in C++ documentation ?
So Qt devs I found some code for example
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/gui/text/qtextcursor.cpp#n1151
And it looks like it should be better to call const variant
what do you think ??
And
This is a (logical) C++ aspect, not a Qt thing:
non-constant pointers call non-contant methods in priority.
Philippe
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:02:44 +0200
Michal Lazo wrote:
I still don't see reason why compiler don't call const variants to access raw
pointer
>
You just have to change your line:
Car * carPtr =
with
const Car * carPtr =
Philippe
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:40:01 +0200
Michal Lazo wrote:
> Hello
> example
> https://pastebin.com/xL9yWhKe
>
>
>
> I never used QSharedDataPointer in my code but is is heavily used in Qt
> My problem is
20 matches
Mail list logo
