On 5/3/21, 11:40 AM, "Interest on behalf of Matthew Woehlke"
wrote:
Isn't it obvious? Once upon a time, before they "lost their way", Qt was
useful to him. He was passionate about *that* Qt and wants it back.
I understand *exactly* how he feels.
I get the frustration. But I think
On 4/30/21, 7:06 AM, "Lars Knoll" wrote:
If he decides to come back after that I do expect that his emails follow
our CoC and stay on topic for this mailing list. Any further violations will
lead to a permanent ban.
Thanks, Lars, both for the ban and the explanation. Sigh of relief from m
> On 4/1/21, 7:08 AM, "Interest on behalf of Turtle Creek Software"
> wrote:
Hi Casey, welcome to the ML. I'd like to respond to some of your comments. I
hope you don't mind me addressing them out-of-order.
> Qt promises that, but the Qt team responses on this thread make me nervous
> about
Hi Daes,
On 5/24/20, 7:19 AM, "Daesdemon" wrote:
Hi Brett,
I don't know why, but i even didn't think to use REP on the server
side,only. That could obviouly changes a lot of thing as a boilerplate
tool. It was an all or nothing in my head, even if i knew globally the
Hi Daes,
On 5/22/20, 12:41 PM, "Daesdemon" wrote:
Hi Brett,
Thanks for your answer.
My current project is completly based on dynamic Replica, i cannot use
Rep, and i am quite happy of the result. To simplify, i have only QML on
the client.
Dynamic replic
Hi Daes,
On 5/21/20, 5:15 PM, "Interest on behalf of Daesdemon"
wrote:
> Hello Qt people,
It seems that QObject properties of a base classe are not exposed to
Replicas of Derived class.
Of course they aren't.
This seems to me like a bug but i would like to have your thoug
how is exposed this
QRemoteObjectPendingCall in QML ? with a PendingReply ?
Is there an example of that also (calling a slot with pending value on a
dynamic replica from qml) ?
Cordially.
Daes
Le 08/08/2019 à 21:37, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) a écrit :
Hi,
The constructor is private because yo
Hi,
The constructor is private because you aren’t intended to create the dynamic
replica directly, you must get it from a node. The object won’t be valid until
it receives an initial state from a source in another node, so the nodes must
be connected together.
See:
https://code.woboq.org/qt5
On 4/22/19, 10:10 AM, "Marc Van Daele" wrote:
• If I don't need signals and slots on my Person class, I should use a POD.
PROP(QList persons) will be supported but whenever something changes
in the list or any property of any item in it, the complete list has to be
resent (there is onl
Hi Marc,
On 4/20/19, 6:46 AM, "Interest on behalf of Marc Van Daele"
wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to understand the remoteobjects component.
Suppose I have, on my backend, a Household containing a list of Persons.
The intent is for Qt Remote Objects to allow what Qt allows, w
On 8/18/17, 3:09 AM, "Interest on behalf of Houssem GHIAT"
wrote:
Why does repc generate the SimpleSource version of the classes with only
private members, why not with protected members, is it a needed design decision
?.
The idea was simply that if you needed anything more than what was
On 8/9/17, 8:45 AM, "Interest on behalf of Houssem GHIAT"
wrote:
Hi,
Actually I am using QtRO module in a distributed service like application,
where what I call a service is a QObject remoted over the network using QtRO.
As far as I know QtRO support only TCP protocol without
On 6/15/17 5:39 AM, "Andrew Ialacci" wrote:
> I am trying to have the repc compiler automatically generate a repc file from
> an existing QObject.
>
> According to the documentation below this should be possible using the
> QOBJECT_REPLICA macro.
>
> However, there is no informati
13 matches
Mail list logo
