Hi Lars,
Il 16/10/19 15:13, Lars Knoll ha scritto:
As it turned out, there was some miscommunication that happened
regarding the re-licensing of Qt PDF, and not all contributors were on
board regarding the license change. That means we’re not changing the
modules license and won’t be adding it
On Thursday, 17 October 2019 06:42:27 PDT d3fault wrote:
> This is excellent news. I hope those contributors continue to resist
> the change to GPLv3. As a developer who releases his code under an
> LGPLv3-like license, all of Qt's GPLv3/Commercial modules are useless
> to me.
Please note that the
+1
> On Oct 17, 2019, at 6:42 AM, d3fault wrote:
>
> On 10/16/19, Lars Knoll wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As it turned out, there was some miscommunication that happened regarding
>> the re-licensing of Qt PDF, and not all contributors were on board regarding
>> the license change. That means we’re not
On 10/16/19, Lars Knoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As it turned out, there was some miscommunication that happened regarding
> the re-licensing of Qt PDF, and not all contributors were on board regarding
> the license change. That means we’re not changing the modules license and
> won’t be adding it to beco
Hi,
As it turned out, there was some miscommunication that happened regarding the
re-licensing of Qt PDF, and not all contributors were on board regarding the
license change. That means we’re not changing the modules license and won’t be
adding it to become a supported part of Qt until this has
Hi,
Open-source licensing of Qt Wayland Compositor, Qt Application Manager and Qt
PDF is to be changed from LGPLv3/Commercial to GPLv3/Commercial. Change becomes
in effect with Qt 5.14 release. Going forward, these modules are no longer
available under LGPLv3 license option. The key rationale
