Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Ilya Diallo
Easy solution: create the rol...@qt-projet.org list and send him and his (surely numerous) followers there. Think "separation of concerns" rather than "ban" Le jeu. 29 avr. 2021 à 13:46, Tuukka Turunen a écrit : > Hi, > > > > Perhaps we have been too long tolerant for the behavior that many see

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Benjamin TERRIER
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 15:15, Bob Hood wrote: > On 4/29/2021 4:02 AM, Bernhard Lindner wrote: > > Obviously, Qt has nothing to do with this type of software engineering. And > it's obviously > not suitable for functional safety (at least not if you take it seriously). > > > If this statement is

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Bob Hood
On 4/29/2021 4:02 AM, Bernhard Lindner wrote: Obviously, Qt has nothing to do with this type of software engineering. And it's obviously not suitable for functional safety (at least not if you take it seriously). If this statement is true /and/ Roland's statement that TQC actively courted

[Interest] Call retranslateUi() from UI generated/loaded directly from *.ui

2021-04-29 Thread Nicholas Yue
Hi, I am developing an application where I am generating the UI via loading the *.ui rather than using uic to generate the source/header file. I need to call retranslateUi to update my translation but most documentation talks about a generated method by uic e.g. void retranslateUi(QWidget

[Interest] qmake (wasm) : qtlogo.svg

2021-04-29 Thread Nicholas Yue
Hi, When building a Qt app with qmake that was build as WASM, it generate a corresponding *.html which references the qtlogo.svg file cme.html: Is there some option in the *.pro I can specify to tell qmake to use a different SVG file instead? Cheers -- Nicholas Yue Graphics -

[Interest] emit keyword being used with non-signal

2021-04-29 Thread Nuno Santos
Hi, I’ve been having a lot of this warnings by QtCreator. These are being raised by signals and I don’t find a reason for them to appear. Can anyone explain why this happens and how to solve? Thanks! Nuno ___ Interest mailing list

[Interest] emit keyword being used with non-signal

2021-04-29 Thread Nuno Santos
Hi, I’ve been having a lot of this warnings by QtCreator. These are being raised by signals and I don’t find a reason for them to appear. Can anyone explain why this happens and how to solve? Thanks! Nuno ___ Interest mailing list

Re: [Interest] emit keyword being used with non-signal

2021-04-29 Thread Kai Köhne
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Interest Im Auftrag von Nuno > Betreff: [Interest] emit keyword being used with non-signal > > Hi, > > I’ve been having a lot of this warnings by QtCreator. > > These are being raised by signals and I don’t find a reason for them to > appear. > > Can

Re: [Interest] Porting custom QML plugin to the Qt6

2021-04-29 Thread Mitch Curtis
See also https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-89274 and some of the related tasks. > -Original Message- > From: Interest On Behalf Of Jakub > Narolewski > Sent: Wednesday, 28 April 2021 9:54 PM > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: [Interest] Porting custom QML plugin to the Qt6 >

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest
On 29/04/2021 00:42, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest wrote: If the answer is yes, you were lying. If the answer is no, or you don't answer, then you're trolling the mailing list. You'll get my apology; I'll even throw in, for free, my personal congratulations for the long trolling. But, you'll

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Filip Piechocki
I totally agree with you, Guiseppe. I am subscribed to this list for a long time as it happened several times in the past that the issues I was facing with Qt were already solved here. But the list became more of a Roland's trolling sandbox, where he is throwing sand in others' eyes and having

Re: [Interest] emit keyword being used with non-signal

2021-04-29 Thread Christian Kandeler
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-25165 On 4/29/21 10:22 AM, Nuno Santos wrote: Hi, I’ve been having a lot of this warnings by QtCreator. These are being raised by signals and I don’t find a reason for them to appear. Can anyone explain why this happens and how to solve? Thanks!

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread coroberti
Dear Guiseppe, You were very helpful for the list members and personally to me. The list will deteriorate without you. Sincerely hope that the moderator will start to function and to do something. Note, that for Roland it's a pure business - spread links and sell books, support, perhaps projects

Re: [Interest] Locale detection of Qt application hosted via WASM

2021-04-29 Thread Kai Köhne
> Von: Interest Im Auftrag von Nicholas Yue > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. April 2021 18:41 > An: interest@qt-project.org > Betreff: [Interest] Locale detection of Qt application hosted via WASM > > Hi, > > I have the following code (part of a small project) which is being built both > as a

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Nuno Santos
+1 > On 29 Apr 2021, at 10:37, Florian Bruhin wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:13:13PM +0300, coroberti wrote: >> Dear Guiseppe, >> You were very helpful for the list members and personally to me. >> The list will deteriorate without you. >> >> Sincerely hope that the

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Bernhard Lindner
The main problem isn't trolling. The main problem is: Roland comes from a completely different world. The world of functional safety. This world is difficult and a completely different from conventional software development. It is particularly different from smartphone and web development. And

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey everyone, On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:13:13PM +0300, coroberti wrote: > Dear Guiseppe, > You were very helpful for the list members and personally to me. > The list will deteriorate without you. > > Sincerely hope that the moderator will start to function and to do something. > > Note, that

Re: [Interest] emit keyword being used with non-signal

2021-04-29 Thread Nuno Santos
Thanks! :) > On 29 Apr 2021, at 09:58, Kai Köhne wrote: > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Interest Im Auftrag von Nuno >> Betreff: [Interest] emit keyword being used with non-signal >> >> Hi, >> >> I’ve been having a lot of this warnings by QtCreator. >> >> These are being

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Christoph Cullmann
On 2021-04-29 11:45, Nuno Santos wrote: +1 +1 On 29 Apr 2021, at 10:37, Florian Bruhin wrote: Hey everyone, On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:13:13PM +0300, coroberti wrote: Dear Guiseppe, You were very helpful for the list members and personally to me. The list will deteriorate without you.

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Robert Buchinger
Most time just reader here, but it's sad to see that one person has a lot of fun destroying a mailing list. "congrats" on this, Troll.Br /RAm 29.04.2021 10:41 schrieb Filip Piechocki :I totally agree with you, Guiseppe.I am subscribed to this list for a long time as it happened several times in

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread coroberti
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:05 PM Bernhard Lindner wrote: > What I don't understand is why Roland doesn't just leave the mailing list and > forget about > Qt. IMHO, it's a business model. Distribute the links to your books and your web-site, and hopefully, sell the books and/or find new

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Ilya Diallo
The other part of the problem is that he doesn't come from the world of well-adjusted, well-behaved people. This could answer your question. Le jeu. 29 avr. 2021 à 12:05, Bernhard Lindner a écrit : > The main problem isn't trolling. The main problem is: Roland comes from a > completely >

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Massimiliano Maini
Yeah, maybe that's part of the problem but, as you said, the solution should be simple: he leaves the mailing list or, if that's not possible, the admins "make him leave". On top, with his ramblings and often totally wrong assertions (the "April's fool link"-gate scandal has been absolutely

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Tuukka Turunen
Hi, Perhaps we have been too long tolerant for the behavior that many see problematic (myself included). The challenge is the mix of valid and invalid items. It is easier to react to things that are clear violations to our CoC: http://quips-qt-io.herokuapp.com/quip-0012-Code-of-Conduct.html