On 8/8/22 16:09, Jörg Bornemann wrote:
Mitch already pointed you to QTBUG-74940. The biggest question
regarding a linuxdeployqt is: what exactly is the deployment format
going to be? There's no standard way of deploying Linux applications.
There are many.
The community contributions create
please file a bug report
Mike
> On 8 Aug 2022, at 17:21, Nicholas Yue wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I have now tried calling updateImplicitBounds() but it returns false
>
> Is that indicating some underlying issue elsewhere?
>
> ```
> Status changed: Qt3DRender::QSceneLoader::Loading
> Status
From: Benjamin TERRIER
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 9:20 AM
To: Qt Interest
Cc: Scott Bloom
Subject: Re: [Interest] Official linuxdeployqt ?
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 18:10, Scott Bloom
mailto:sc...@towel42.com>> wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 08:10, Jörg Bornemann
Hi Mike,
I have now tried calling updateImplicitBounds() but it returns false
Is that indicating some underlying issue elsewhere?
```
Status changed: Qt3DRender::QSceneLoader::Loading
Status changed: Qt3DRender::QSceneLoader::Ready
Entity: Qt3DCore::QEntity(0x7ffaac004660, name = untitled.obj)
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 18:10, Scott Bloom wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 08:10, Jörg Bornemann wrote:
>
> On 8/4/22 19:42, Scott Bloom wrote:
>
> > Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
> >
> > I found the 3^rd party version, but the command line args are
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 08:10, Jörg Bornemann
mailto:joerg.bornem...@qt.io>> wrote:
On 8/4/22 19:42, Scott Bloom wrote:
> Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
>
> I found the 3^rd party version, but the command line args are very
> different.
Mitch already
On 8/8/22 05:00, J?rg Bornemann wrote:
The community contributions create AppImage packages. That seems to be
a reasonable choice. Other opinions?
AppImage packages are high risk for malware (yes, it exists on Linux).
When building on Fedora RPM packages have gotten sooo simple. It used to
Am Freitag, 5. August 2022, 18:16:53 CEST schrieb Scott Bloom:
> Unfortunately both of these solutions (runtime dependencies and static
> build) only solve the staticly bound dynamically loaded DLLs
That's not true. A static Qt build also has plugins in form of static
libraries and you'll have
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 08:10, Jörg Bornemann wrote:
> On 8/4/22 19:42, Scott Bloom wrote:
>
> > Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
> >
> > I found the 3^rd party version, but the command line args are very
> > different.
>
> Mitch already pointed you to
On 8/4/22 19:42, Scott Bloom wrote:
Is there a Qt supported linuxdeployqt comparable to the windeployqt?
I found the 3^rd party version, but the command line args are very
different.
Mitch already pointed you to QTBUG-74940. The biggest question
regarding a linuxdeployqt is: what exactly
10 matches
Mail list logo