Re: [Interest] QtSVG deprecated

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:34:45PM -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday, 11 de January de 2012 15.34.34, Alex Malyushytskyy wrote: No you don't. You have something which tries to implement Svg Tiny, but apparently is not complete or bug-free. I believe you are wrong. Check

Re: [Interest] Qt 4.8 qtcreator

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:10:01PM +, kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote: I did some more testing and I seem to have the same problem on a number of RedHat Linux computers. The problem is: starting qtcreator is unsuccessful, it crashes with a core dump after printing the

Re: [Interest] Building Qt from Sources

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:38:28PM -0800, Szalata, Zenon M. wrote: Here is my directory structure: /opt/qt/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0 /opt/qt/qt-4.8.0 /opt/qt/qt-creator-2.4.1-src /opt/qt/qtc-2.4.1 I have unpacked qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0 into the first directory.

Re: [Interest] more QSharedPointerQuestions

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:34:04PM -0800, Jason H wrote: So I have a QObject-derived object tree, like a QObject* tree; I made everything QSharedObjectQObject accordingly. Why? QObject ownership is typically handled easily using the parent-child relationship. Give your objects a parent object

Re: [Interest] Automatic deletion of children of QObject

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:35:16PM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: Hi Jochen, On 06/13/12 22:50, Jochen Becher wrote: Of course it is not a bad idea to access siblings in a destructor. Why should it? If destruction follows in a known and reliable way there is no reason to avoid it. I do it to

Re: [Interest] Can't Debug on Windows 7: Invalid parameter passed to C runtime

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:25:59PM -0400, Josiah Bryan wrote: I'm attempting to debug an odd problem wherein my program (http:// code.google.com/p/dviz/) crashes when displaying certain UTF-8 strings. That's not really why I'm emailing - the problem I'd like your help with is that I'm unable

Re: [Interest] Nokia SDK vs. Qt Commercial SDK

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:33:02PM -0700, David Ching wrote: Hello, A couple days ago Turunen Tuukka from Digia responded to my question here about getting an SDK with Qt 4.8.2 in it by saying There is no Qt Project SDK for 4.8 - just the Nokia SDK and Qt Commercial SDK. Does this

Re: [Interest] Can't Debug on Windows 7: Invalid parameter passed to C runtime

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:52:45PM -0400, Josiah Bryan wrote: The real problem here is that Qt Creator / Debugger doesn't even bother to give a stack trace of where it stopped at - just the MSVC error dialog, no stack trace. [...] I'll double-check globals, but a stack trace is really what's

Re: [Interest] Why QString and not std::string?

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Rui Maciel wrote: Does anyone know what's the rationale for relying on Qt's custom QString instead of simply using C++'s standard and omnipresent std::string? std::string is closer to QByteArray than to QString, so you are probably not asking the

Re: [Interest] debug mode?

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:27:39PM -0400, Doug Stewart wrote: I am using: Qt Creator 2.4.1 Based on Qt 4.8.0 (32 bit) Built on Mar 21 2012 at 23:05:03 in Ubuntu12.04. I cannot switch to debugging mode in Run Target Selector Anyone know what to do??? What options/build

Re: [Interest] Qt5 - Application compile error on overloaded qRound()

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:55:06PM +1000, Rohan McGovern wrote: It doesn't seem like a Qt bug; rounding an integer doesn't make sense, right? I'd actually think that (an) explicit no-op qRound overload(s) for int(eger types) would solve some of the problems here... Andre'

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator 2.6 and Qt5 newer than beta2

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 08:41:27AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: On sexta-feira, 16 de novembro de 2012 17.19.04, Tobias Hunger wrote: Hello! The newly released Qt Creator 2.6 does not accept Qt 5 versions later than beta2, since it is failing to detect the ABIs used. This is due to

Re: [Interest] Breakpoints stopped working with latest version on Linux

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:08:41AM +, Robert Wood wrote: Folks, My breakpoints have stopped working and I'm getting this message: warning: GDB: Failed to set controlling terminal: Invalid argument\n This message is Mostly Harmless. I have gdb version 7.3.50.20110722 installed.

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 and filesystem

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:09:50AM +0100, Bo Thorsen wrote: Hi Stéphane, Yes exactly, the problem is that QML is young. I expect that the capabilities will expand quite a lot over the coming years, and file handling is an obvious place for improvements. Qt (the C++ parts) had over 16 years

Re: [Interest] QtCreator, Mac OSX and LLDB?

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:03:23PM +, Danny Price wrote: What is the status of LLDB support via Creator on OSX? Nobody had time to look into it since Summer or so it as far as I know. My main problem with LLDB right now is that it does not even pretend to play nicely in the cross-platform

Re: [Interest] QtCreator, Mac OSX and LLDB?

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:39:10PM +, danny wrote: Again I assumed it was common knowledge. It has been discussed on this list (or perhaps the old interest list) before. But if you want to me to report it in the tracker, I will. bugreports.qt-project.org is the preferred way to report

Re: [Interest] QtCreator, Mac OSX and LLDB?

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:02:16AM -0500, Michael Jackson wrote: On Jan 22, 2013, at 4:25 PM, André Pönitz wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:50:30PM +, danny wrote: I assumed it was common knowledge - you WILL hit this problem if you try to trace into a non-trivial Qt application

Re: [Interest] Direction of Qt [Was: Re: QML Runtime]

On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:06:03AM +, Mark Summerfield wrote: Hi Shawn, On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:50:53 + Rutledge Shawn shawn.rutle...@digia.com wrote: [snip] - Would this mean that QML would be able to access all or most of the Qt C++ APIs (e.g., QFile, etc.)? No, adding new

Re: [Interest] Debugging as root.

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:22:07PM -0500, Jason Cipriani wrote: I'm developing an application in Qt Creator that needs to be run as root. I'd rather not run Qt Creator itself as root. Can I configure Qt Creator to run the application as root when I press the run button? You can set up

Re: [Interest] Debugging as root.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:26:07AM +0100, Bo Thorsen wrote: Den 14-02-2013 03:54, Thiago Macieira skrev: On quarta-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2013 19.22.07, Jason Cipriani wrote: I'm developing an application in Qt Creator that needs to be run as root. I'd rather not run Qt Creator itself

Re: [Interest] Debugging as root.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:53:23AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2013 20.18.12, André Pönitz wrote: If that's a feature you use regularly and/or of general interest you could consider filing a feature request on bugreports.qt-project.org. I think

Re: [Interest] Oops! Somebody's got a bad case of dependency bloat!

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02:09PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quarta-feira, 10 de abril de 2013 11.55.24, Bob Hood wrote: No doubt you meant what you said. However, it hardly changes the fact that the one omitted is rather ubiquitous, regardless of your personal feelings about it. I

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 19, Issue 41

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Michael Jackson imikejack...@gmail.com wrote: And when will QtCreator support LLDB? I would love to be able to actually debug vectors, maps, sets, QString on OS X. Saves me the trip to Visual Studio. Qt Creator 2.8 will have LLDB support in Experimental state.

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 19, Issue 82

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 03:36:21PM +0100, Danny Price wrote: I've used QMake in two large cross-platform projects, one of which wasn't even a Qt application. I did look at other options including CMake and Premake 4 but decided to stick with QMake. Here are my thoughts: [...] -

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 19, Issue 82

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:14:23PM +0100, Danny Price wrote: On 19 Apr 2013, at 20:49, André Pönitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote: On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 03:36:21PM +0100, Danny Price wrote: I've used QMake in two large cross-platform projects, one of which wasn't even

Re: [Interest] QtCreator c++11 integration

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:39:29PM +, Adrian Stern wrote: Hi Is there an overview or a roadmap showing features included in QtCreator and also features still in development? All my C++11 code compiles and runs without an issue. The only drawback there is, is the lack parser support for

Re: [Interest] QtCreator c++11 integration

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:48:51PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: On segunda-feira, 10 de junho de 2013 23.47.04, André Pönitz wrote: Same problem with with auto-typed variables. For example when auto-typing a function: Auto class::dostuff() - vectorint*; struct Foo { vectorint *foo

Re: [Interest] QtCreator 2.8.0 and CentOS 6.4: No go

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:02:14PM -0600, Bob Hood wrote: I have to do some Qt development work with CentOS 6.4 and Qt 4.8.4. Out of the box, CentOS 6.4 provides gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3). Attempting to install QtCreator 2.8.0 is a miserable failure because any useful

Re: [Interest] 64 bit capable QVector

(re-arranged) On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:55:33PM +0200, Philippe wrote: AlexV Malyushytskyy alexmal...@gmail.com wrote: This question appears on the mailing lists since Qt 3 at least . At one point I was disappointed with having signed int restriction, but then I decided that QT

Re: [Interest] Semi-OT: Was Nokia net good or bad for Qt?

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:20:24AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: Every year in the Qt Developer Days plenary sessions, the audience asked for more bugfixing, fewer new features, and definitely no regressions. We listened. So instead of breaking QtWidgets by refactoring it, we kept it as-is,

Re: [Interest] Looking for third party Qt libraries

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:43:37AM +0200, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: We all know that Qt is great, but we also know that it can't possibly cover all use cases. Fortunately there are plenty of third party libraries based on Qt, which fill a lot of gaps, so you don't have to develop everything

Re: [Interest] Qt based LRU container?

On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 09:35:39PM +0200, Mark wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote: On 19 October 2013 18:43, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone know of an LRU based container for Qt? I'm specifically looking for an implementation that notifies me

Re: [Interest] What for does qt5gui need OpenGL?

On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:51:16AM +0100, Tomasz Olszak wrote: 2013/11/7 Uwe Rathmann uwe.rathm...@tigertal.de On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:03:47 -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: Shouldn't they be in Qt5OpenGL.dll? No, they are where they were supposed to be. That's by design.

Re: [Interest] What for does qt5gui need OpenGL?

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 07:15:29PM +, Joseph Crowell wrote: AFAIK you can build Qt5 with no-opengl switch and you should be able to run QtWidgets applications without having libQt5OpenGl dependency in libQt5Gui. The problem is that this won't scale. One cannot provide custom builds of

Re: [Interest] QML performance on iOS?

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:54:21AM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote: Why not tell them that QML is native? Believe it or not, some people simply dislike the idea of lying. With native people usually associate certain properties, like performance, lack of separate run time environment, seemless blending

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.3 OSX: Debugging failed

On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:49:23PM +0200, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: I remember faintly that with previous Qt Creator versions I had to build some debug helper libraries somewhere in the Settings - is this still required? No. It's not needed, and not possible anymore. The compiled helpers were

Re: [Interest] Keeping QML module versions up to date in a project

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 08:13:32AM +, Koehne Kai wrote: [...] Still - the only guarantee you get with a specific import version is that of the API, but not the behavior. Thus, it's perfectly possible that someone swaps the libs and your app *IS* affected. See for example the QML

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.4 target description

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:22:03AM +, Nuno Santos wrote: Hi, After installed Qt 5.4 on my system, the target options for Mac and iOS appears with the following description: Desktop Qt %{Qt:Version} clang 64bit iphoneos-clang Qt %{Qt:Version} for iOS-1 Android appears correctly.

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 Creator (Mac) Debugger should use the system python executable

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:09:47PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: Hello, The recent discussion about debugging with Qt Creator on OS X reminded me of an issue I encountered with the version that's installed obligatorily by the Digia Qt installer. The embedded debugger uses a python

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 Creator 3.3 (Mac) Debugger locks up with endless error logging of DW_AT_specification(address) has no decl

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:11:48PM -0800, Jim Prouty wrote: I'm hoping someone can tell me how we can fix our Qt development environment to avoid this frustration: Way too often Qt Creator 3.3 completely locks up when it hits certain breakpoints in our app using our self-compiled Qt 5.4.1 on

Re: [Interest] porting to Qt 5.4 - MOC very slow on Windows

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:00:53PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On 15/01/15 19:23, Koehne Kai wrote: IIRC moc in Qt 5 got much more accurate in the parsing phase, which might mean it now parses included headers that it previously missed. 2 - 3 seconds is quite long though ... Maybe

Re: [Interest] porting to Qt 5.4 - MOC very slow on Windows

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:31:11PM +0100, Massimiliano Maini wrote: Sorry for the off-topic, but why do Qt5/C++11 create a lesser value for QAction::data() ? Because you can connect a lambda to QAction::triggered directly. Andre' ___ Interest mailing

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.3 vs Qt 5.4 (etc)

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:24:37PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: Hi Rene, On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:35 AM, René J.V. rjvber...@gmail.com wrote: If this principle was in place for Qt 5.2 too, I can thus upgrade my Linux box's Qt 5.2 (Ubuntu 14.04) to Qt 5.3.2 (backported from Ubuntu

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.3 vs Qt 5.4 (etc)

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:56:56AM +0100, Alejandro Exojo wrote: El Saturday 10 January 2015, René J.V. Bertin escribió: On Saturday January 10 2015 11:44:37 Tomasz Olszak wrote: Thanks again, And here is interesting article about it:

Re: [Interest] QList operator[]

On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 05:42:02PM +, Brad Pepers wrote: I added a couple lines of code to an app and suddenly it started chewing through memory at an unbelievable rate.  I watched it get up to 12 GB at which point it hit my virtual memory limit in Windows and Windows promptly

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 Creator (Mac) Debugger should use the system python executable

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:42:05AM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: On Wednesday February 04 2015 23:44:25 André Pönitz wrote: Hi, The solution is to start LLDB, and use the Python it links to implicitly by using the LLDB 'script' command, instead of hoping that the system Python

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 Creator (Mac) Debugger should use the system python executable

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:33:09AM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: On Thursday February 05 2015 08:22:09 Harri Pasanen wrote: llbd script run our script but that doesn't strike me as very elegant either. If it is a long running script, it seems quite elegant to me, as I solves the

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 07:22:37PM +0100, Alejandro Exojo wrote: El Wednesday 11 March 2015, Bernhard escribió: However currently both sites seem unusable. gitbounty says nothing more than Coming Soon... and bountysource display an effectively empty page when clicking on some Qt issue (on

Re: [Interest] Qt Performance : QT Widget Application vs WPF

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:19:42PM +0530, Chandralatha Harish wrote: Hi All, I was trying to evaluate QT vs WPF in terms of Memory , Performance , Window HAndles, User objects, GDI and so on.. So built 2 identical looking controls in WPF and QT with all values harcoded. BAsically a

Re: [Interest] Qt container size()

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 02:32:13PM +0100, Felix morack wrote: Is there any reason for this? Why dont they use size_t like the STL and the rest of the world? It's 2015, people will increasingly bump into this limitation - i just did. If you have 2^31 items or more in a container you *need*

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator cannot debug on iPad device, Xcode has no problem with same iPad?

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:11:38PM +0300, Robert Iakobashvili wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Edward Sutton edward.sut...@subsite.com wrote: Hi Robert, Thank you for your patience and detailed steps. I understand now. All is good! -Ed Great. I'd say that

Re: [Interest] QVariantMap: constEnd() not equal to end()?

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:35:20AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On 25/03/15 05:16, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Tuesday 24 March 2015 17:29:39 Gunnar Roth wrote: Does anybody know why QT_STRICT_ITERATORS is not standard? First, because it breaks existing, legitimate code that mixes const and

Re: [Interest] Qt ownership model

On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 08:13:40PM +0300, Антон Жилин wrote: > The aim of these suggestions is not to change how memory management works > in Qt, but to wrap it in a uniform syntax, and by the way, eliminate the > need for explicit usage of `new`. > We need to view each case of memory allocation

Re: [Interest] Are slots even needed these days?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 08:35:39AM +0100, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: > > Am 16.03.2016 um 22:37 schrieb André Pönitz <apoen...@t-online.de>: > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:31:33PM +, Gian Maxera wrote: > >>> I can connect to Foo::bar either way. If I do

Re: [Interest] Are slots even needed these days?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:02:17PM +, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > I prefer “slotFoo” and “slotBar” as well as “sigFoo” and “sigBar” > > It really lets the methods stand out as slots and signals.. It also means, > don’t > think “sender()” can ever valid if you are not in a “slotXYZ” function.

Re: [Interest] Are slots even needed these days?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:31:33PM +, Gian Maxera wrote: > > I can connect to Foo::bar either way. If I don't intend to ever use > > the old-style connect syntax, is there a reason to have "public > > slots:" anymore? > > One reason that for me it’s fundamental: Readability of your code !!!

Re: [Interest] Very large QRC file

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:39:02PM +0100, Jason H wrote: > I have a qrc devoted to media: audio and video. It's only about 100 > megs total of both (2 videos and several languages for each). It > results in about a 500MB cpp file. It takes 8 gigs to compile, which > is what my hardware ram is, so

Re: [Interest] Very large QRC file

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 09:49:41PM +, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > > > CONFIG += resources_big > > > Nice. Since 5.4. Never knew. "Just works". Thanks! > > > What does this flag do? It replaces the creation of a big .cpp with a char[] containing the data by two passes, first

Re: [Interest] Are slots even needed these days?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 08:23:48AM +0300, Constantin Makshin wrote: > Another thing I personally don't like in the new connection syntax is > that it forces signals to be public, making it possible to do all type > of wonders by faking/simulating events on behalf of other objects. > > For

Re: [Interest] Broken Android gdb debugging ?

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:57:55PM +, Edward Sutton wrote: > My Android gdb debugging and deployment broke recently after I switched from > Eclipse to Android Studio and installed Qt 5.6.0. > > I am not sure what to check? Try NDK 10e, not 11b or 11c Andre'

Re: [Interest] Broken Android gdb debugging ?

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:02:13PM +, Edward Sutton wrote: > Thank you Andre. > > After rolling back to r10E I still cannot deploy and debug. It no > longer hangs at the deploy stage. This is an improvement. > > The Android Kit GDB Server is still pointing to the Android Studio >

Re: [Interest] Why int for size() of containers instead of quint32?

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:29:38PM +0300, Николай Шатохин wrote: > Hello. > > I see that Qt uses int type many times in containers implementations? Why? > Why do you not use your own quint32? Why do you using signed and platform > dependent type for this purpose? Both signed-vs-unsigned, and

Re: [Interest] using cmake to build Qt projects.

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 06:53:54AM -0400, Bill Crocker wrote: > >>I am trying to port my Qt project to a cmake based build so I can use CLion > >>for debugging. > > > >Why is CLion preferable for you to do Qt debugging, opposed to e.g. using Qt > >Creator? > > > > Because CLion works out of the

Re: [Interest] What's the recommended way to put QObjects in smart pointers?

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:24:48AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 04/05/16 21:35, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >On quarta-feira, 4 de maio de 2016 20:56:52 PDT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> From what I can tell, QPointer does not delete the object, so that's a > >>no go. > >> > >>Putting the

Re: [Interest] using cmake to build Qt projects.

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 07:54:53AM -0400, william.croc...@analog.com wrote: > > > > >>I have never been able to get creator to work. The 5 series won't even run > >>under my versions of VNC and the NX virtual desktops. This apparently due > >>to a > >>dependency on new visual fluff. > > > >Qt

Re: [Interest] Preferred way to create custom look-and-feel GUI

On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 04:40:02PM +0200, Jan Müller wrote: > What does QtCreator use to implement the GUI? A few of the ~50 standard plugins (the Welcome screen and the QML tooling) are using Qt Quick but the bulk of plugins as well as the shell including the mode bar on the left are all Qt

Re: [Interest] Utilizing the GPU, how to start?

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 06:10:37PM +, J-P Nurmi wrote: > > On 06 Jul 2016, at 19:41, Uwe Rathmann > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:58:48 -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >> > >> So what you want isn't QWidget with OpenGL support. We've proven it > >> won't

Re: [Interest] Utilizing the GPU, how to start?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:41:33PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 5 de julho de 2016 11:45:41 PDT Jason Kretzer wrote: > > How does one get Qt widgets to take advantage of a GPU? If this > > question seem naïve, it is because it is. > > > > With my application, I am displaying

Re: [Interest] Utilizing the GPU, how to start?

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:16:46PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 6 de julho de 2016 20:23:44 PDT André Pönitz wrote: > > > Stop using QtWidgets, including QtWebView and QLabel, and transition > > > to Qt Quick instead. Qt Quick uses the GPU, QtWidgets do no

Re: [Interest] QDateTime Issue in Qt5.8.0 msvc2013,msvc2015

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:46:13AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em quarta-feira, 1 de fevereiro de 2017, às 16:33:33 PST, Günter Michel > escreveu: > > OK my fault, qDebug() results are also ok here, seems debug view related. > > I have looked at debugger Output in Qt Creator 4.2.0 ( dt

Re: [Interest] Debugging helpers in Ubuntu

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Viktor Engelmann wrote: > If it has to do with certain variables, then that only makes sense if > the "locals and expressions" panel wants to display an object that has > been deleted already, so there would be a dangling pointer. Does that > happen in

Re: [Interest] Debugging helpers in Ubuntu

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:56:28AM +0100, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote: > Hi, > > I have a fresh & clean Ubuntu 16.04 install which is up to date. > > With QtCreator, if I enable the debugging helpers and stop on some > breakpoints, I get a bunch of "Segmentation fault" dialog boxes opening >

Re: [Interest] Optimizing performance with hundreds of widgets

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:28:22PM +, Gibbs, Matt wrote: > Hi All, > > I’m working on a Qt-based project to display rapidly updating > information from a control system. I want to display hundreds of > signals, each updating at about 10 Hz. As a performance test, I’ve > thrown 500 Labels in

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.8.0 RC build under windows

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:09:41PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2017 00:20:03 PST Prav wrote: > > So finally : Qt version 5.8.0 can NOT be build under Win7 with Win7SDK!? (It > > seems Qt for desktop need some definitions from WinRT ... who know why) > > Qt

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.6LTS vs 5.7+

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 07:38:18PM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > -Original Message- From: Interest > > [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- project.org] On > > Behalf Of Roland Hughes Sent: sunnuntaina 4. syyskuuta 2016 21.14 To: > > 2202873.hgKzyLeXCm@patux.local;

Re: [Interest] Using QtQuick Controls 2 on android

On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:10:18PM +0200, Wolfgang Baron wrote: > > Am 07.09.2016 um 09:30 schrieb Alexandru Croitor: > >If my memory serves, it used to work about a year ago with Qt 5.5 + Quick > >Controls 1, because I tested a QML app on an Android emulator. Don't know > >what changed now. > >

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:43:37AM +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > I quite like QML as a declarative markup language, but am less enthused > > about > > JavaScript. It seems like kind of a toy programming language. I'm a bit > > shocked that you can write "code" where you can happily call

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 02:37:01AM +0200, Xavier Bigand wrote: > I am using Qt for my day job, > > Our first difficulty with Qt is the release cycle that is really long and the > difficulty to test the futur versions. As we often need the latest features > or > bug fixes, waiting 3-4 month

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 09:20:43PM +0100, Sérgio Martins wrote: > Hi, > > > It's not unusual for us developers and contributors to lose > perspective of what's important. > After many years spent on very particular implementation details, it > becomes difficult to see outside of the box. > >

Re: [Interest] What you don't like about Qt

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 05:13:44PM +0200, Jason H wrote: > > > Not an isolated case. Client after client tells the same story. The > > licensing > > team at Digia must be paid on commission because _every_ use requires a > > license when you first contact them. > > FWIW, My dealings with the

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:42:44AM +, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2016, at 22:52, Rob Allan wrote: > > My biggest gripe is that the Qt Quick object model seems to be much > > more poorly supported in C++ than it is in QML. For example, in C++ > > you really

Re: [Interest] Qt containers deprecated with 5.0?

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:54:54AM +0100, André Somers wrote: > There is nothing wrong with using Qt containers either (with the exception > of QList (Irrational hatred [TM]) Andre' ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org

Re: [Interest] QLineEdit::editingFinshied()

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 03:55:11PM +0100, André Somers wrote: > > > Op 29/11/2016 om 15:53 schreef Duane: > >On 29/11/2016 9:16 AM, Duane wrote: > >>On 29/11/2016 8:54 AM, Robert Buchinger wrote: > > > >Putting a breakpoint in the code was causing the focusOut to fire when the > >slot was hit

Re: [Interest] Which "Widget" technology to use when starting a new desktop app

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:03:56PM +0100, Jason H wrote: > > > After watching the webinar "The Curse of Choice: An overview of GUI > > technologies in Qt?"[1] I am even more confused as to what to use for > > our new desktop app. Here are a few of the background details. The app > > will be

Re: [Interest] Failed first try with Qt on Android

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 06:35:32PM +0300, Serge K via Interest wrote: > I think this question better ask in conventional Qt-user's forums. This here is the conventional Qt User forum. Andre' [And no, I can't answer the original question. Last time I tried SameGame on Android a couple of months

Re: [Interest] QtDesigner needs redesign.

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 01:55:43PM +0300, Serge K via Interest wrote: > I used QtCreator with older Qt versions. Now I use QtCreator 4.0.1 > with Qt5.6.1 but I cannot see major difference between it's QtDesigner > and old one. There is none. > Through years Designer remains the same with ugly >

Re: [Interest] 2017

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 01:50:06PM -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 3 de janeiro de 2017 16:19:27 BRST René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > >Another alternative of course is to use some other client-server protocol > > >such that only the “model” of MVC is on the server, and UI rendering > >

Re: [Interest] QtDesigner needs redesign.

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 01:40:51PM +, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > > On 2 Jan 2017, at 14:15, Thiago Macieira > > wrote: > > > > On segunda-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2017 13:55:43 BRST Serge K via > > Interest wrote: > >> Is there anybody now creating NEW QtDesigner?

Re: [Interest] Getting a QImage from an QML Image, protocol, , agnostic QImage?

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 08:56:18AM -0500, Roland Hughes wrote: > And some 12 year old kid will do a Web search, find the interest archive > messages then do exactly that. Once they release their app into the wild > they will be in all kinds of legal trouble. That is why I chimed in. These > posts

Re: [Interest] QML debugger doesn't work for big cmake-based project

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 05:48:43PM +0300, Alexander Ivash wrote: > I'm experiencing issues with enabling QML debugger for huge > cmake-based project. I've added add_definitions(-DQT_QML_DEBUG) and > enabled checkbox in Qt Creator but breakpoints never triggered. On > launching debugger I see 'QML

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 68, Issue 13

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:17:22PM -0500, Roland Hughes wrote: > > On 05/18/2017 08:31 AM, Kevin Funk wrote: > >Citing you from the thread: > >>... > >>No, KDevelop does things completely different from Qt so not an > >>option... > >>... > >KDevelop is an IDE, Qt is an application development

Re: [Interest] Flickering when animating QWidget resize

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:26:22AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday, 25 August 2017 09:26:22 PDT Michael Jackson wrote: > > In our application, we are attempting to create a "fly out" effect with a > > QWidget based window and when the animation happens the QWidget flickers > > badly. We

Re: [Interest] [Development] Short/medium term evolution of the Assistant?

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 04:02:02PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Friday November 10 2017 13:19:39 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > > >(switched mailing list to interest since this post is not about qt > >development per se) > > Where Qt development does come in is with this: > > are there plans

Re: [Interest] [Development] Short/medium term evolution of the Assistant?

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:03:46PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > > are there plans to retire QtWebKit support, migrate to using QtWebEngine > > > or > > > to improve QTextBrowser's HTML support? > > > > WebEngine is plainly inacceptable as dependency for QTextBrowser which is > > part > >

Re: [Interest] [Development] Short/medium term evolution of the Assistant?

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:10:26PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday, 10 November 2017 11:41:56 PST André Pönitz wrote: > > > are there plans to retire QtWebKit support, migrate to using QtWebEngine > > > or to improve QTextBrowser's HTML support? > > > >

Re: [Interest] QtCreator, the past...

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 04:59:12PM +0100, Jason H wrote: > Real programmers use edlin.exe That would imply using Windows. Nah... Andre' ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] qmlscene install problems (was: Interest, Digest, Vol 82, , Issue 5)

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 09:51:22AM -0500, Roland Hughes wrote: > When the virus known as QML was unleashed on the world, Released in September 2010. > the "teaser app" was the Welcome screen in QtCreator. First draft in November 2010, submitted in June 2011, release in September 2011. Andre'

Re: [Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 12:09:03AM +1200, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On 31 July 2018 at 23:55, Kai Koehne wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Interest On Behalf > >> Of Christian Gagneraud > >> [...] > >> >> We used to build Qt-5.6.3 on and for Linux-i386. > >> >> I recently had

Re: [Interest] qmlscene install problems (was: Interest, Digest, Vol 82, Issue 5)

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:10:20AM -0500, Roland Hughes wrote: > On 07/16/2018 11:10 AM, Ulf Hermann wrote: > > And none of that has anything to do with qmlscene being installed or not, or > > how Qt Creator deals with it. Also, the qmlscene utility and the QML > > language > > are two rather

Re: [Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:52:07AM +0300, coroberti . wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Tomasz Siekierda wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote: > >> > It might

  1   2   >