Re: [Interest] the path forward - that 7 year thing - was, , willy-nilly

On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 02:54, Jason H wrote: > > Tukka, you (Digia, aka "QtCo") no longer offer the perpetuity clause of the > license. Which is absolutely insane for a commercial customer. If we are no > longer developing that code, we should still be able to "distribute" that > code. The

Re: [Interest] The willy-nilly deletion of convenience,, methods

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 02:44, Roland Hughes wrote: > On 3/24/21 8:21 AM, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 01:22, Roland Hughes > > wrote: > Apparently Martians fart sulfur Apparently Roland talks sulfur ___ Int

Re: [Interest] The willy-nilly deletion of convenience,, methods

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 02:36, Ulf Hermann wrote: > > On 3/24/21 2:21 PM, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 01:22, Roland Hughes > > wrote: > >> You forgot customer abandonment > >> > >> death of OpenSource LTS > >> >

Re: [Interest] The willy-nilly deletion of convenience,, methods

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 01:22, Roland Hughes wrote: > You forgot customer abandonment > > death of OpenSource LTS > > Qt 6 being useless > > QML needing to be ripped out. Is there life on Mars? ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org

[Interest] Paying customers (was Re: The willy-nilly deletion of convenience, methods)

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 04:49, Roland Hughes wrote: > On 3/23/2021 8:57 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: [...] > > I'm not actually convinced that paying Qt customers aren't getting the > > support they paid for; that information is generally not going to be > > publicly available. [...] > The complete

Re: [Interest] Mixing Commercial and Open Source license for, different, projects

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 00:41, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 03:32, Roland Hughes > wrote: > > > On 3/17/21 6:00 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > > >> Out of curiosity: what alternatives are people settling on? > > > > >

Re: [Interest] Mixing Commercial and Open Source license for, different, projects

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 03:32, Roland Hughes wrote: > > On 3/17/21 6:00 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > >> Out of curiosity: what alternatives are people settling on? > > > Forgot to mention. Comcast dumped Qt in favor of Webkit some time late > last year. You probably were on the SPAM and phone

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 pull out of open source?!

Hi Giuseppe, On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, 21:42 Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest, < interest@qt-project.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Il 07/01/21 04:03, Jérôme Godbout ha scritto: > > Hi, > > is this any true? > > > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Qt-5.15-LTS-Commercial-Phase > > Please see the

[Interest] Qt on Android as system libraries

Hi there, Has anyone ever installed Qt as system libraries on Android and generated APKs that depend on Qt but do not contain it? We currently have several system APK for our AOSP based OS and for now they all contain their own copy of Qt. AFAIU, the Qt java code does as well a relocation of Qt

Re: [Interest] What is this list all about anyway?

On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 20:06, Julien Cugnière wrote: > > Le jeu. 16 juil. 2020 à 08:08, Nuno Santos a > écrit : > > I believe that this individual brings nothing but noise to this table and > > should be removed from the list. How many people here think the same? > > > > If the community

Re: [Interest] List on moderation

On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 01:02, Andy Shaw wrote: > The global moderation is only going to be for a very short period, and we > will lift it because we do not want to prevent open discussion and so on, the > intention is to make sure this stays a safe space for the community to > interact and not

Re: [Interest] List on moderation

On Thu, 16 Jul 2020, 23:28 Cristián Maureira-Fredes, < cristian.maureira-fre...@qt.io> wrote: > > Mails on uncontroversial topics will be let through, > but please understand that moderation will induce some delay. > Is there an uncontroversial definition of 'controversial topic'? Has it been

[Interest] white paper downloads

Hi there, Am i the only one to be really annoyed with having to give my details over and over? Names, Company, Role, Business email, country, phone number?!? To download a whitepaper? I'm already logged in on account.qt.io, why can't i just download the document? PS: The email verification

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt, Commercial developers

On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 02:19, Roland Hughes wrote: > On 4/3/20 6:11 AM, Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 19:09, Roland Hughes >> wrote: >> Well I hope you didn't use doxygen for your documentation when using >> your commercial license. It seems y

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt, Commercial developers

On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 19:09, Roland Hughes wrote: > No, that was never the point of this thread. Me too: My first 'commercial' Android app, made with 'pure' commercial Qt SDK, produced its first crash report: 04-03 11:30:53.384 17079 17115 E AndroidRuntime: Process:

Re: [Interest] QtSerialBus on Android

On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 at 05:10, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Thursday, 12 December 2019 18:28:26 PST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > A stock Android NDK has the kernel headers for CAN, but doesn't have > > libsocketcan. > > libsocketcan doesn't seem to be necessary, a

Re: [Interest] QtSerialBus on Android

On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 19:42, André Hartmann wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > A stock Android NDK has the kernel headers for CAN, but doesn't have > > libsocketcan. > > libsocketcan doesn't seem to be necessary, as per configure's output > > No, it is not mandatory. But for 5.14 it became optional

Re: [Interest] QtSerialBus on Android

On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 01:55, Denis Shienkov wrote: > > Hi, > > > Yes I saw that, but same apply to QtSerialPort, i don't see why it's > not available on Android. Android IS a Linux system, and it does have > the tty bits. > > Because it requires the root right to use the serial ports in Android.

Re: [Interest] QtSerialBus on Android

QtSerialPort/Bus for Android Thanks for the details, Chris PS: I'm not talking Mobile app dev here, i'm talking writing system tool for a custom AOSP system. > > Regards, > André > > Am 12.12.19 um 02:40 schrieb Christian Gagneraud: > > Hi there, > > > > Any reason wh

[Interest] QtSerialBus on Android

Hi there, Any reason why QtSerialBus is not available on Android? I'm using Qt-5.12 on armv7. We have our custom N2K stack that just works on Android (using socketcan). But i'm working on a project where i would prefer to use QSerialBus for all the low level stuff. I haven't try to build it

Re: [Interest] Klocwork errors in Qt

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 16:06, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 17:36:37 PST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > My point is that this sort of bugs are really hard to detect during > > code review. This is subtle & nasty 'feature' of QStringBuilde

Re: [Interest] Klocwork errors in Qt

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 19:28, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest wrote: > > Il 04/12/19 02:36, Christian Gagneraud ha scritto: > > BTW, Clazy has a check for that very specific case, which just show > > how dangerous is this QStringBuilder. > > https://github.com/KDE/clazy

Re: [Interest] Klocwork errors in Qt

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 13:05, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > IMHO, it is legit to write code like: > > const QUrl url(urlString); > > const auto appId = url.host() + "." + url.path().mid(1); > > doSomeThing(appId); // void doSomeThing(const QString ); > > > > Yet it results in crashes, apparently

Re: [Interest] Klocwork errors in Qt

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 20:09, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Monday, 2 December 2019 18:53:14 PST Ramakanth Kesireddy wrote: > > We got below errors in Qt 5.13 using C++ QWidgets while running static code > > analysis withKlocwork: > > > > 1)Address of a local variable is returned via return

Re: [Interest] Code coverage with QtCreator

On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 03:53, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 03.09.2019, 18:45, "Andy" : > > Not sure if it's quite what you're looking for, but I wrote up a tutorial > > on using gcov & lcov with Qt5 & Qt Creator: > > > > "Code Coverage Of Unit Tests Using Qt 5 On macOS" > >

Re: [Interest] Suitable Qt version

On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 20:36, praveen kumar wrote: > > Hi team, > > please suggest a suitable/ customized Qt version for my low end hardware > configuration. > > Please find below my hardware configuration details: > > RAM - 32MB/64MB > FLASH - 64 MB XIP > Processor - ARM CORTEX A9 @ 400MHz >

Re: [Interest] How can I build a qt source for linux fbdev?

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 04:10, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Tuesday, 25 June 2019 06:40:21 PDT 민경욱 wrote: > > My Qt5 application has tearing on Odroid C2 (Mali450, Ubuntu 18.04). > > > > So I wanna try on fbdev not X11. > > > > but, I hava no idea about build qt source for linux fbdev.. > > > >

Re: [Interest] Online doc URL improvement

On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 11:58, Sze Howe Koh wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 10:09, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > I quite often read the documentation online, b/c the urls are quite > > short and simple i usually type them in dir

Re: [Interest] Online doc URL improvement

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 23:07, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 06.06.2019, 05:09, "Christian Gagneraud" : > > Hi there, > > > > I quite often read the documentation online, b/c the urls are quite > > short and simple i usually type them in directly in the URL b

[Interest] Online doc URL improvement

Hi there, I quite often read the documentation online, b/c the urls are quite short and simple i usually type them in directly in the URL bar. One little thing is annoying me, the '.html extension. Wouldn't it be great if instead the url would be 'doc.qt.io/qt-5/qwidget'. That is shorter to type

Re: [Interest] QtCreator & ABI is incompatible for armeabi-v7a

On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 10:16, Alexander Ivash wrote: > > I've got a weird issue: QtCreator disallows to upload apk or debug it > due to 'ABI is incompatible error'. It definitely used to work in the > past (yes, my device is really armeabi-v7a and armeabi-v7a is really > what I select in

Re: [Interest] FW: How can I implement QModbusClient for MODBUS ASCII mode?

On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 21:09, Олег Гаврильченко wrote: > > Hello. > > I want write QModbusClient/QModubsServer subclasses, that communicate via > MODBUS ASCII mode. Have you looked at https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtserialbus-index.html ? Eg. they have master/slave Modbus examples. Chris

Re: [Interest] Operator QMap[] is casting to int?

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 00:14, Ola Røer Thorsen wrote: > > > lør. 4. mai 2019 kl. 17:51 skrev Thiago Macieira : >> >> No, the size of something definitely fits in int on 32-bit systems. And why >> do >> you need to do any static_cast in the first place? > > > We build our code using gcc with the

Re: [Interest] Replacement for Qt4 QMatrix4x4?

On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 05:37, Jason H wrote: > > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 at 4:27 AM > > From: "Christian Gagneraud" > > Would you consider making arm v8 the minimum requirement for Qt6? > > You might anger the raspberry pi people who still u

Re: [Interest] Scaling out of SVG in QGraphicsScene background

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 19:18, Felix Rubio Dalmau via Interest wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am trying to paint a SVG I have on a file on the background of a > QGraphicsScene, and I am facing some issues: if I subclass QGraphicsScene and > in the __init__ method I add: > >

Re: [Interest] Replacement for Qt4 QMatrix4x4?

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 19:34, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Thursday, 21 February 2019 13:47:05 PST Matthew Woehlke wrote: > > (Uh...why? I am not particularly amused by the loss of precision, nor > > the extremely subtle incompatibility.) > > Changed in commit

Re: [Interest] Fwd: vs. Flutter

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 03:56, Julius Bullinger wrote: > > On 21.02.2019 15:44, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > Qt is free (on mobile), free as in liberty, as long as your > > application is free, as in liberty. > > That's basic (L)GPL rules. > > > > Now there's

Re: [Interest] Fwd: vs. Flutter

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 02:53, René Hansen wrote: > > You're reversing the burden of proof here. Where have Qt stated that it is > non-free for mobile? > > The licensing terms are the same no matter the platform; Qt is LGPL or > Commercial. It's up to you to adhere to whichever license you

Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter

On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 02:57, Jason H wrote: > > Are there any good Qt vs Google Flutter comparisons? > I took a brief look, it looked like a declarative JS framework. Usually the > difference with between Qt and the competition is Qt abstracts there platform > libraries (i.e. Gstreamer vs

Re: [Interest] What are you using for continuous integration?

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 13:54, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 13:46, Jérôme Godbout wrote: > > > > Jenkins work well for me (you can ditch the custom Groovy and just call > > some python or whatever script you like) > > > > htt

Re: [Interest] What are you using for continuous integration?

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 13:46, Jérôme Godbout wrote: > > Jenkins work well for me (you can ditch the custom Groovy and just call some > python or whatever script you like) > > https://jenkins.io/ > > I recommend the pipeline and put a jenkinsfile into your repos to setup the > build. So your

[Interest] Mailing list archive annoyance

Hi all, I do not know what is going on with the mailing list archive, but this is getting frustrating. Trying to move forward and keep positive, i would like to report on a(nother) use case here: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-71225 This bug report starts with a couple of links to the Qt

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.9 with Wayland IVI Extension

On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 14:12, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > That's a pity, because QtWayland could be used for client side only, > and Weston+IVI on the compositor side. > Apparently Weston is "better" Than QtWayland, see 26:36 of > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9mobvi

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.9 with Wayland IVI Extension

On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 01:47, Johan Helsing wrote: > > Hi Vikas, > > it's a bit confusing, since there are multiple ivi protocols around > (https://github.com/GENIVI/wayland-ivi-extension/tree/master/protocol) > > In Qt, we support "ivi-application", which is, as Chris wrote, a dead simple >

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.9 with Wayland IVI Extension

On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 00:01, Awadhiya, Vikas wrote: > > Hi All, > I run a simple Qml application in Wayland IVI Extension (Weston 5.0) with > following console commands, > user@$ layer-add-surfaces 1 10 > QT_WAYLAND_SHELL_INTEGRATION=ivi-shell ./simple –platform wayland > Then my application

Re: [Interest] Issue with VirtualKeyboad and Wayland compositor.

On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 17:20, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 13:51, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > > I'm running the QtWayland 'pure-qml' example on an imx61 board with > > linuxfb QPA, Qt-5.11.1 (I'm waiting for a 5.11.2 build). > > I follo

Re: [Interest] Issue with VirtualKeyboad and Wayland compositor.

On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 13:51, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > I'm running the QtWayland 'pure-qml' example on an imx61 board with > linuxfb QPA, Qt-5.11.1 (I'm waiting for a 5.11.2 build). > I followed instructions from > http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtvirtualkeyboard-deployment-guid

[Interest] Issue with VirtualKeyboad and Wayland compositor.

I'm running the QtWayland 'pure-qml' example on an imx61 board with linuxfb QPA, Qt-5.11.1 (I'm waiting for a 5.11.2 build). I followed instructions from http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtvirtualkeyboard-deployment-guide.html#using-qt-virtual-keyboard-with-qt-wayland. The wayland client is the QtWidget's

Re: [Interest] Macro to identify desktop(Ubuntu-X86) and embedded Linux(ARM)

On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 at 18:35, Ramakanth Kesireddy wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there any macro to identify desktop(Ubuntu x-86) and embedded Linux(ARM) > in Qt 4.8 or 5.x? https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtglobal.html#Q_PROCESSOR_X86 https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtglobal.html#Q_PROCESSOR_ARM

Re: [Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names

On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 04:28, Jason H wrote: > > It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform > kit name structure. > > I'd like it to be Qt / Version / Platform like > Qt 5.10.1 for Desktop > Qt 5.10.1 for iOS > Qt 5.10.1 for iOS Simulator > > Instead I currently

[Interest] [noob/qml] anchoring to window vs item

Hi there, I'm trying to create a screen, with 2 vertical side bars, when the screen is shown, i would like to have a gentle animation where the side bars looks like they come from the outer sides. I can achieve this result when my bar item bind to the width property of the windows, but it doesn't

[Interest] Qt 5.12

Hi all, Does anyone know if Qt 5.12 will support Linux on 32 bits Intel platforms? I'm planning to try to build the new 5.12 branch on i386/ubuntu-16.04. Any input/info appreciated. Thanks Chris ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org

Re: [Interest] How to change parent of scaled QGraphicsItem while retaining scene bounding rect?

em.setRotation(0.0); item.setParentItem(next_parent); AFAIR, QGI's rotation and scale need to be reset b/c they are combined with QGI's transform() Hope this help! Chris > > Thanks! > >> On Aug 7, 2018, at 6:24 PM, Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> >> On 8 August 201

Re: [Interest] How to change parent of scaled QGraphicsItem while retaining scene bounding rect?

On 8 August 2018 at 11:08, Patrick Stinson wrote: > Hello! > > I am trying to change the parent of a QGraphicsItem without it appearing to > move or change size on the scene. Both the item, old parent, and new have > arbitrary scale values set. How can this be done? If you grab the item's

Re: [Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

On 31 July 2018 at 21:43, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Sonntag, 29. Juli 2018 22:58:41 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We used to build Qt-5.6.3 on and for Linux-i386. >> I recently had to downgrade to Qt-5.6.0 (see below), but now the build >>

Re: [Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

On 31 July 2018 at 18:59, André Pönitz wrote: >> And building Qt for Linux 32 is a real pain. > > Can you remind me of an actual problem with that? > > The machine I am using to write this mail here has a Qt base at > cc03bad229 (last September) and Qt Creator at 99e3635ef3c (last week). > >

Re: [Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

On 1 August 2018 at 00:51, Kai Koehne wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Christian Gagneraud >> [...] >> > And building Qt for Linux 32 is a real pain. >> > Why don't you provide QQuickCompiler for Linux32 to your paid customers? >> >>

Re: [Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

On 1 August 2018 at 00:09, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On 31 July 2018 at 23:55, Kai Koehne wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Interest On Behalf >>> Of Christian Gagneraud >>> [...] >>> >> We used to build Qt-5.6.3 on and fo

Re: [Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

On 31 July 2018 at 23:55, Kai Koehne wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Interest On Behalf >> Of Christian Gagneraud >> [...] >> >> We used to build Qt-5.6.3 on and for Linux-i386. >> >> I recently had to downgrade to Qt-5.6.0 [...] >

Re: [Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

On 31 July 2018 at 23:45, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Dienstag, 31. Juli 2018 13:32:38 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> On 31 July 2018 at 21:43, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: >> > On Sonntag, 29. Juli 2018 22:58:41 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> >> Hi, &

Re: [Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

On 31 July 2018 at 21:43, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Sonntag, 29. Juli 2018 22:58:41 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We used to build Qt-5.6.3 on and for Linux-i386. >> I recently had to downgrade to Qt-5.6.0 (see below), but now the build >>

Re: [Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

On 30 July 2018 at 16:05, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Sunday, 29 July 2018 13:58:41 PDT Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We used to build Qt-5.6.3 on and for Linux-i386. >> I recently had to downgrade to Qt-5.6.0 (see below), but now the build >> fails wit

[Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

Hi, We used to build Qt-5.6.3 on and for Linux-i386. I recently had to downgrade to Qt-5.6.0 (see below), but now the build fails with: qtwebengine/src/3rdparty/chromium/net/third_party/nss/ssl/ssl3con.c: In function 'ssl3_ChaCha20Poly1305':

Re: [Interest] Running Qt application on Linux without screen

On 19 June 2018 at 18:49, Tomasz Olszak wrote: > It needs OpenGL and 60fps from camera. > > Anyway I got some hints from QtWayland maintainer and hopefully small patch > will allow me to use wayland without screen and show application on real > screen once it is available. > > Will let you know

Re: [Interest] Running Qt application on Linux without screen

On 18 June 2018 at 23:26, Tomasz Olszak wrote: > Hello, > > Has anyone of you needed to handle following use case? > > > 1. Linux > 2. Full screen GUI app - fast as much as possible so no X, considered eglfs > over drm and wayland > 3. It starts as a service without screen > 4. Screen can be

Re: [Interest] QDatastream, QMap, QImage serialization

On 23 May 2018 at 00:25, william.croc...@analog.com wrote: > >> To summarise: >> - Qt is a graphical toolkit > > > ...and I used it to create a graphical application. > But then my users wanted to create hard copy from > batch jobs running on our compute farm. Those

Re: [Interest] QDatastream, QMap, QImage serialization

On 22 May 2018 at 02:03, Jason H wrote: > Going through the list of Qt GUI classes, there are several that I think > should be moved: > QImage > QStandardItem* It's GUI stuff, what's wrong with that? > Matrix and Vector classes Definitely, I should be able to do 2D/3D/4D

Re: [Interest] QDatastream, QMap, QImage serialization

On 21 May 2018 at 20:12, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: >> Why is QImage even a GUI type? 99% of what I do with QImage is not for >> GUI. I can understand that QPixmap is GUI, but to me QImage is i/o and >> pixel/metadata manipulation (using scanline() where

Re: [Interest] Unit test framework

On 9 March 2018 at 18:35, Himanshu Vishwakarma wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your response. > > Actually, I am a beginner in the qt and C++. > and I am participating in this GSoC where I have to unit testing of > software GCompris: >

Re: [Interest] Unit test framework

On 5 March 2018 at 20:14, Himanshu Vishwakarma wrote: > I have to test the software, not by GUI I have to test the software have > lots of file qml and js, How I can test the file of js and qml through the > qt. > > problem is in the testing of the javascript file. > > How

Re: [Interest] Nice blog posts about cross-compiling Qt apps from windows to linux & mac

On 30/01/2018 6:56 AM, David M. Cotter wrote: You can just use this: http://mxe.cc hmm this appears to allow you to develop on MacOS X are you saying that this lets you cross-compille to Windows? ie: build on MacOS the actual windows binary? but i don’t expect it can debug windows

Re: [Interest] Using private QtQuick APIs

On 17 January 2018 at 21:32, Uwe Rathmann wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:25:35 +, Mitch Curtis wrote: > > This how I do it ( see https://github.com/uwerat/qskinny ): > > QT += quick quick-private > CONFIG += no_private_qt_headers_warning > > To get rid of warnings

[Interest] [5.6] 32bits build of qtwebengine and pkg-config issues on Ubuntu-16.04-x86_64

Hi there, It's me again with my 32bits build on 64bits Linux... I have successfully build all of Qt-5.6 and Qt-5.9 (inc. webengine) in a i386/Ubuntu-16.04 docker container (mainly following https://www.ics.com/blog/how-compile-qt-source-code-linux). Now I would like to do the same in a

Re: [Interest] curiosity killed the cat, or the linuxfb QPA

On 7 January 2018 at 11:01, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hi, > > Curiosity really killed the cat here, or at least my previous Linux uptime. I > fired up a demo app with -platform linuxfb just to see. Nothing happened > while under my X11 session so I logged in on a virtual

Re: [Interest] Tricky to download Qt online installer for 64-bit Linux

On 7 January 2018 at 10:18, René J. V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote: > Christian Gagneraud wrote: > >>> Uh... why do we provide a 32-bit installer in the first place, if we don't >>> provide a 32-bit build of Qt? >> >> This one allows to inst

Re: [Interest] Tricky to download Qt online installer for 64-bit Linux

On 6 January 2018 at 13:25, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday, 5 January 2018 19:27:40 -02 Henry Skoglund wrote: >> However, while on >> Windows and MacOs you only get one Download button, on Linux you'll get >> two, one for 64-bit and one for 32-bit. >> >> 2 buttons

Re: [Interest] Tricky to download Qt online installer for 64-bit Linux

On 6 January 2018 at 11:00, Christian Gagneraud <chg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 January 2018 at 10:27, Henry Skoglund <fro...@tungware.se> wrote: >> 2 buttons are fine, the problem is that whichever button I click on, I >> always get qt-unified-linux-x86-2.

Re: [Interest] Tricky to download Qt online installer for 64-bit Linux

On 6 January 2018 at 10:27, Henry Skoglund wrote: > 2 buttons are fine, the problem is that whichever button I click on, I > always get qt-unified-linux-x86-2.0.5-2-online.run downloaded, not the > qt-unified-linux-x64-3.0.2-online.run :-( Same problem here, Firefox 52.5 64

Re: [Interest] qt.git: broken v5.6.0 .gitmodules?

On 10/12/2017 9:53 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 23:43:31 PST Christian Gagneraud wrote: The build is not broken and nor is the tag. Something is broken for sure. Yes, the script is. No one has volunteered to fix it. The source code is fine. From http

Re: [Interest] qt.git: broken v5.6.0 .gitmodules?

On 10 December 2017 at 20:01, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 22:00:24 PST Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> > Correct, the branches don't exist anymore. The commits still do. >> >> Is it me or this is a se

Re: [Interest] qt.git: broken v5.6.0 .gitmodules?

On 10 December 2017 at 18:13, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 19:30:41 PST Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> Is it me or .gitmodules on tag v5.6.0 is broken? >> .gitmodules set the branch

[Interest] qt.git: broken v5.6.0 .gitmodules?

Hi there, Is it me or .gitmodules on tag v5.6.0 is broken? .gitmodules set the branch name of all qt modules to '5.6.0', but these branches don't exist (anymore?). The only branches available on qt submodules are '5.6, '5.7', ... and tags like 'v5.6.0', 'v5.6.1', ... git clone $qt5url cd qt5 git

Re: [Interest] Need advice to add tests to an existing, project

On 8 November 2017 at 13:35, Roland Hughes wrote: > Not that weird really. If this is an embedded system and a well designed > one, the first layer of "tests" would be the built in diagnostics mode which > exercises all of the components and blurts out various

Re: [Interest] Need advice to add tests to an existing project

On 8/11/2017 11:50 AM, Xavier Bigand wrote: Thank you Christian for answer. Yes I thought to create a static library of our project, but as we have many IDE it will be an effort to do that. So I think that I found a better solution as we already have a special build Developer for us, we can

Re: [Interest] Need advice to add tests to an existing project

On 8/11/2017 11:50 AM, Xavier Bigand wrote: Thank you Christian for answer. Yes I thought to create a static library of our project, but as we have many IDE it will be an effort to do that. So I think that I found a better solution as we already have a special build Developer for us, we can

Re: [Interest] QtMessageHandler writing to dialog or to Windows Event Log?

On 6/11/2017 10:49 PM, Joerg Desch wrote: Is there a QtMessageHandler open source implementation available, implementing the "Windows Event Log" mechanism? Or is there a Qt Widget which displays a logging window with binding to QtMessageHandler? I want to have a simple to use (for users)

Re: [Interest] Need advice to add tests to an existing project

On 4 November 2017 at 05:12, Xavier Bigand wrote: > Hello, > > I recently added some unit tests to a personal project made with qbs, and I > am interested to do something similar on my work project. > > > We already have some hand made tests that are launched at start

Re: [Interest] Future of Qt3d

On 3/11/2017 5:39 AM, Pierre Chicoine wrote: Does anyone know the future of Qt3d? After Sean posted his problem with management of Qt, we've heard nothing. It's not just Qt3d, KDAB is a big contributor and there are many other contributors involved. It would be really nice to have a quick

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt installation prefix path issue

On 26/10/2017 5:51 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 21:47:07 PDT Christian Gagneraud wrote: results: https://github.com/apple/darwin-xnu/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93=read_random+ e= Answer is item 6: osfmk/prng/random.c See, it works! ;) Hmmm... This also works *now

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt installation prefix path issue

On 26/10/2017 4:55 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 20:03:43 PDT Christian Gagneraud wrote: Even "read_random xnu site:github.com" returns the result that point to bsd/sys/random.h in the apple/darwin-xnu repo (ranked 4 for me) By the way, I w

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt installation prefix path issue

On 26/10/2017 12:05 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 15:41:48 PDT Christian Gagneraud wrote: Interesting "read_random site:github.com/apple/darwin-xnu" returns 6 results. One of them points to bsd/sys/random.h, is this your missing include? ;P Yes,

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt installation prefix path issue

On 26/10/2017 11:21 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 14:47:43 PDT Christian Gagneraud wrote: Considering the contents of that website change very frequently, I'd assume that the reason is either that there's no point indexing something that becomes stale quickly

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt installation prefix path issue

On 26/10/2017 9:55 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 13:32:29 PDT Christian Gagneraud wrote: On 25/10/2017 11:12 PM, Maurice Kalinowski wrote: The reason is that code.qt.io is never meant as a public searchable tool, but its purpose has always been to reduce the load

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt installation prefix path issue

On 25/10/2017 11:12 PM, Maurice Kalinowski wrote: The reason is that code.qt.io is never meant as a public searchable tool, but its purpose has always been to reduce the load on gerrit when doing initial clones. Come on people, it's not that everything is meant to be purely evil, but as

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt installation prefix path issue

On 25/10/17 22:25, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: Hi, To get an idea of how patching Qt5 works, one can look at the function patchQtCore() used in windeployqt. It will give you an idea of how its done on windows. http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qttools.git/tree/src/windeployqt/utils.cpp#n948 Thank you

Re: [Interest] What's happening w/Qt3D?

On 24/10/2017 4:39 pm, "Andy" wrote: I just noticed that all of the Gerrit changes from KDAB contributors to qt/qt3d have been abandoned. What's going on? Don't know if it's related but QtTraces review has been abandoned too w/o any apparent reason, it's a pity it looked

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt installation prefix path issue

On 18/10/2017 8:08 pm, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: [moving to the interest mailing list; please drop development@ when replying] On Tuesday, 17 October 2017 23:38:24 PDT bhaskar kotha wrote: > How to configure Qt so that Qmake should not take absolute path. That's not

Re: [Interest] move methods in QList

On 10 October 2017 at 19:45, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > I'm interested in storing a big structure in QList, and I would like to move > it to the list, but unlike std::list QList does not seem to have > push_back(T&&), insert(..., T&&) etc. > > Should I use std::list

Re: [Interest] Synchronous painting on QGraphicsScene

timeline. Chris > > Make sense? > > > On Oct 7, 2017, at 1:01 AM, Christian Gagneraud <chg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7 October 2017 at 16:08, Patrick Stinson <patrickk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi there! > > I have a graph-ish diagram app where dragging so

Re: [Interest] Poor retina support for QGraphicsView on macOS?

On 7 October 2017 at 16:11, Patrick Stinson wrote: > > Hello! > > I am seeing the antialiasing is still quite grainy using a QGraphicsView on > mac. Is it possible to increase the device pixel ratio, or something similar? > > See attached screenshots, expanding to full rez

  1   2   >