On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Tony Rietwyk t...@rightsoft.com.au wrote:
Going WAY off topic, but:
If they can convert LLVM to Javascript, why can't they convert to a JVM
bytecode for Android, etc? Sounds like a great project!
In the lines of this?
http://vmkit.llvm.org/
The code
-project.org
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Tony Rietwyk t...@rightsoft.com.au wrote:
Going WAY off topic, but:
If they can convert LLVM to Javascript, why can't they convert to a JVM
bytecode for Android
] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
On 17/01/13 17:51, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
17.01.2013, 19:38, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm
18.01.2013, 12:44, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com:
to know a minimum of 3 technologies, but more like 6: HTML, JS, CSS, MIME,
MIME's a tech?!?! I thought it's just a standard used in emails and
HTTP headers to define the content type.
It's also a common way to distinguish file
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru wrote:
18.01.2013, 12:44, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com:
to know a minimum of 3 technologies, but more like 6: HTML, JS, CSS, MIME,
MIME's a tech?!?! I thought it's just a standard used in emails and
HTTP
18.01.2013, 13:35, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru wrote:
18.01.2013, 12:44, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com:
to know a minimum of 3 technologies, but more like 6: HTML, JS, CSS,
MIME,
MIME's
On 18/01/13 11:35, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru wrote:
18.01.2013, 12:44, Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu@gmail.com:
to know a minimum of 3 technologies, but more like 6: HTML, JS, CSS,
MIME,
MIME's a tech?!?! I thought
On 01/17/2013 05:00 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 17/01/13 17:51, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
17.01.2013, 19:38, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
On 18/01/13 13:41, Samuel Rødal wrote:
No, NaCL provides sand-boxing as well and is thus a very safe
alternative to downloading a native executable. Downloading and
installing a browser plugin tends to be a much more stream-lined process
too.
I guess someone just needs to write a killer
...@gmail.com
To: interest@qt-project.org
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
On 17/01/13 22:50, Jason H wrote:
What is the web you speak of? LOL
It's this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWW
;-)
Anyway, that [zero-install
:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
to know a minimum of 3 technologies, but more like 6: HTML, JS, CSS, MIME,
MIME's a tech?!?! I thought it's just a standard used in emails and
HTTP headers to define the content type.
SQL, .NET or Java or PHP, not to mention Linux/IIS
OT, but isn't that done by examining file extensions or file headers
(like how the 'file' command works in Linux)?
Once you've detected what the data is, you need to tell whomever asked
about it what it actually is. You need a communication protocol for
that. Like MIME. So you get the
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Jason H scorp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Bringing this discussion back to Qt, there is something that elegantly
does this already. QML. Drop the idea that it
is for GPUs and graphics and instead use it to serialize to HTML/JS/CSS
(or my JML) and you have your new,
, 2013 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
OT, but isn't that done by examining file extensions or file headers
(like how the 'file' command works in Linux)?
Once you've detected what the data is, you need to tell whomever asked
about it what it actually is. You need
:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Jason H scorp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Bringing this discussion back to Qt, there is something that elegantly does
this already. QML. Drop the idea that it
is for GPUs and graphics and instead use
-project.org
interest@qt-project.org
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
Well I've been posting about QML as a web technology for over a year now. Maybe
2. And I'm on the Wt list for about a year ;-)
I can understand why they want
18.01.2013, 18:24, Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Jason H scorp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Bringing this discussion back to Qt, there is something that elegantly does
this already. QML. Drop the idea that it
is for GPUs and graphics and instead use it to
On 16/01/2013 09:30 م, Pau Garcia i
Quiles wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Jan
Krause jan.krause.n...@gmail.com
wrote:
I read this post yesterday, I found
Emscripten-Qt really promising
On 17/01/2013 09:50 م, Jason H wrote:
What
is the "web" you speak of? LOL
Anyway, that [zero-install] is definitely a legitimate issue.
However I have to puke and kick a puppy when it comes to overall
web development. We were
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Jason H scorp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Bringing this discussion back to Qt, there is something that elegantly does
this already. QML. Drop the idea that it
is for GPUs and graphics and instead use it to serialize to HTML/JS/CSS (or
my JML) and you have your new,
-Original Message-
Anyway, that [zero-install] is definitely a legitimate issue. However
I have to puke and kick a puppy when it comes to overall web
development.
We were approaching something really good with Java and .NET, but
these got sidelined by a handful of
17, 2013 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
On 17/01/13 03:07, d3fault wrote:
Whoa. +1 for being simultaneously entirely pointless (hurr Let's
compile cross-platform C/C++ into cross-platform INTERPRETED
JavaScript)
How's that pointless? I, for a change, would *love
On 17/01/13 16:31, Jason H wrote:
You all are doing it wrong!!!
grin
If you want to make Qt5 web-able, what you need is a way to directly
translate the OpenGL calls of Qt5's QML to WebGL.
I'm not even using OpenGL. There's nothing to translate. There's about
3000 lines of code that are
17.01.2013, 18:40, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 16:31, Jason H wrote:
You all are doing it wrong!!!
grin
If you want to make Qt5 web-able, what you need is a way to directly
translate the OpenGL calls of Qt5's QML to WebGL.
I'm not even using OpenGL. There's
Le 17/01/2013 15:31, Jason H a écrit :
You all are doing it wrong!!!
I've been researching this a week or so. Emcripten is not going to work. You
do not want your binary
transalted to JS. The demos are slow, and regardless of optimization will
always be slow. 4MB of
compressed javascript
17.01.2013, 18:49, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 16:43, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
17.01.2013, 18:40, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 16:31, Jason H wrote:
You all are doing it wrong!!!
grin
If you want to make Qt5 web-able, what you need is a way
is there, and in metro
areas is ok, but it cannot be compared to your home pipe.
From: Yves Bailly yves.bai...@sescoi.fr
To: interest@qt-project.org
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
Le 17/01/2013 15:31
On 17/01/13 16:53, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
17.01.2013, 18:49, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 16:43, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
17.01.2013, 18:40, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 16:31, Jason H wrote:
You all are doing it wrong!!!
grin
If
On 17/01/13 16:43, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
17.01.2013, 18:40, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 16:31, Jason H wrote:
You all are doing it wrong!!!
grin
If you want to make Qt5 web-able, what you need is a way to directly
translate the OpenGL calls of Qt5's QML to
On 17/01/13 17:17, Yves Bailly wrote:
Le 17/01/2013 16:10, Nikos Chantziaras a écrit :
I don't have customers. Why does everybody assume that *everything* out
there is developed on a commercial basis? Have you people never used a
piece of software that is development by someone on their
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking more of ScummVM, DOSBox, Snes9x, etc. Would you run those
on the server? Sure you can do it. But running on the client instead
has enormous benefits. Having to download 10MB of JS is a small price
to
On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking more of ScummVM, DOSBox, Snes9x, etc. Would you run those
on the server? Sure you can do it. But running on the client
17.01.2013, 19:38, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking more of ScummVM, DOSBox, Snes9x, etc. Would you run those
on
On 17/01/13 17:51, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
17.01.2013, 19:38, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking more of ScummVM,
.
From: Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
To: interest@qt-project.org
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
On 17/01/13 17:51, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
17.01.2013, 19:38, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau
+1
On 1/17/2013 1:50 PM, Jason H wrote:
What is the web you speak of? LOL
Anyway, that [zero-install] is definitely a legitimate issue. However I have
to puke and kick a puppy when it comes to overall web development. We were
approaching something really good with Java and .NET, but these
Hello,
Me being the Debian maintaner for Wt, +1
(I think I was the first one to ever mention Wt in this list and in Planet
KDE/Qt :-) )
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Bob Hood bho...@comcast.net wrote:
+1
On 1/17/2013 1:50 PM, Jason H wrote:
What is the web you speak of? LOL
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Jason H scorp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Wt on the other hand, is C++ and takes care of all of that for you. You can
provide a CSS, but you don't have to. It doesn't matter if tomorrow the web
ditches HTML for XML or pure javascript, or ditches MIME headers for JSON
:* Re: [Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web
On 17/01/13 17:51, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
17.01.2013, 19:38, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com:
On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras
rea
Hi,
I read this
post yesterday, I found Emscripten-Qt really promising
project, even I found it in Qt repository. Does anyone know
whether Emscripten-Qt will join to Qt project?
--
Best Regards
Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi
Am 16.01.2013 09:34, schrieb M. Bashir Al-Noimi:
Hi,
I read this post
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTI3NDc
yesterday, I found Emscripten-Qt really promising project, even I
found it in Qt repository. Does anyone know whether Emscripten-Qt will
join to Qt project?
--
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Jan Krause jan.krause.n...@gmail.comwrote:
I read this
posthttp://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTI3NDcyesterday, I
found Emscripten-Qt really promising project, even I found it
in Qt repository. Does anyone know whether Emscripten-Qt will join
Has anyone tried passing the generated javascript to Google's closure compiler?
https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/
--
alexandernst
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
Whoa. +1 for being simultaneously entirely pointless (hurr Let's
compile cross-platform C/C++ into cross-platform INTERPRETED
JavaScript) and extremely useful (launching a browser and pointing it
to a web-page exhausts 99% of end-users' capabilities). Can't wait to
see what comes from this.
I hope they port QtWebkit next, that way I can write my GUI in
html/javascript to then have it rendered by Webkit, which will
incidentally be running as html/javascript. The html/javascript
html/javascript renderer. mind = blown (is dat sum bootstrap?)
Ok I'll shutup now,
d3fault
On 2013/01/17 03:36 AM, d3fault wrote:
I hope they port QtWebkit next, that way I can write my GUI in
html/_javascript_ to then have it rendered by Webkit, which will
incidentally be running as html/_javascript_. The html/_javascript_
html/_javascript_ renderer. mind =
46 matches
Mail list logo
