Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
The final release candidate of PHP 4.3.9 is now available for testing. Hf no
new problems are uncovered, this release will be re-released as 4.3.9 at the
end of the week. If you have any patches (4.X tree) for non-critical problems
please hold them off either until we dec
Yeah I'll try and see what can be done. It might be a bit tricky because
TSRM doesn't "know" PHP but I think it can be solved.
Andi
At 04:33 PM 9/14/2004 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> a) I will try and send internals@ an updated version of the realpath()
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> a) I will try and send internals@ an updated version of the realpath()
> cache in the next few days. This should give a lot of bang for the buck
> because realpath() is probably the suckiest system call in the startup.
Make sure you update it to use the n
At 11:30 AM 9/14/2004 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Can you describe the other non-essential syscalls? I want to be sure we
> really can't cover those (probably some of them we can't).
> As far as the realpath patch goes (which is probably the biggest probl
The final release candidate of PHP 4.3.9 is now available for testing. Hf no
new problems are uncovered, this release will be re-released as 4.3.9 at the
end of the week. If you have any patches (4.X tree) for non-critical problems
please hold them off either until we decide that another RC is n
name = 'Copy';
?>
$ php5 test.php
Warning: __clone method called on non-object in
/usr/home/thekid/test.php on line 6
[Wed Sep 15 00:07:35 2004] Script: 'test.php'
---
/usr/home/thekid/devel/php/php/Zend/zend_variables.c(179) : Block
0x083B67F0 status:
/usr/ho
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Can you describe the other non-essential syscalls? I want to be sure we
> really can't cover those (probably some of them we can't).
> As far as the realpath patch goes (which is probably the biggest problem),
> I think that if we have the realpath cache i
Hello,
I'm experiencing very weird segfaults (and cannot reproduce them with a
small script) in PHP4 (to be exact: PHP4.3.8) - a backtrace is attached.
Now the weird thing is:
#0 0x080e3ff3 in php_char_to_str (str=0x0, len=1515870810, from=34 '"',
to=0x85d5f54 "\"\"", to_len=2,
result=0x8601
At 10:52 AM 9/14/2004 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
The patch doesn't just address realpath though. We have a number of other
redundant/non-essential syscalls in the streams code, for example. And
the realpath cache is still heavier than not worrying about the full path
at all.
Can you describe th
The patch doesn't just address realpath though. We have a number of other
redundant/non-essential syscalls in the streams code, for example. And
the realpath cache is still heavier than not worrying about the full path
at all.
I do agree that however people get this patch, they need to understan
Personally I prefer today's approach vs. a more complex chaining solution.
It only requires an additional if() in your error handler to handle
different error codes differently.
At 10:07 PM 9/13/2004 -0700, Sara Golemon wrote:
> Having it trickle back through the stack would make sense to me too.
Yes I agree.
At 02:02 PM 9/13/2004 +0300, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
AD>>ATM ZE2 calls destructor at the end of the request and no matter is
AD>>there were a fatal error (which should probably stop executing the
AD>>script). In some cases it leads to nasty segfaults (me and report's
AD>>author can r
At 02:02 PM 9/13/2004 +0300, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
AD>>ATM ZE2 calls destructor at the end of the request and no matter is
AD>>there were a fatal error (which should probably stop executing the
AD>>script). In some cases it leads to nasty segfaults (me and report's
AD>>author can reproduce it,
At 19:29 14/09/2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
> And yes, there is no doubt that this patch can critically alter the way
> PHP works and has the potential to break all sorts of stuff. Anything
> that relies on PHP knowing the full path will break. I had to fix both
> xdebug and APC, for example. At
Also <= LONG_MIN needed?
I guess yes?
At 03:22 PM 9/11/2004 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
The DVAL_TO_LVAL macro is quite weird, I'm not sure exactly what it's
supposed to be doing but it probably isn't doing it. If the integral
part of d is outside the range of a long, the conversi
Hey Derick and all,
As I mentioned in the past, I think solving it in a completely compatible
manner is the best way to go.
I sent out the realpath() cache patch which addresses the most problematic
file system issues (and if there are any other things we could probably
address too).
I think the
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
That should have been a #ifndef SKIP_PATH_CHECKS there. And it is there
to get rid of a non-critical ftell().
Attached is the patch with this corrected, and corrected white space.
And yes, there is no doubt that this patch can cri
Yesterday that was a 'wrong fix' too :)
Please can you at least commit that so that the win32 build works as
advertised at least? You can worry about the mystery of other systems
breaking later.
> -Original Message-
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 September 20
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> That should have been a #ifndef SKIP_PATH_CHECKS there. And it is there
> to get rid of a non-critical ftell().
Attached is the patch with this corrected, and corrected white space.
> And yes, there is no doubt that this patch can critically alter th
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Steph wrote:
> Moved #if a few paces to the left on Wez's advice. Fussy old compilers ;)
>
> Still does the same job (fixes win32 build and all builds where there is no
> strcoll), only this time without breaking otherwise happy builds.
It's still wrong. The only change need
Moved #if a few paces to the left on Wez's advice. Fussy old compilers ;)
Still does the same job (fixes win32 build and all builds where there is no
strcoll), only this time without breaking otherwise happy builds.
- Steph
Index: Zend/zend_config.w32.h
==
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Wez Furlong wrote:
> >
> > > There's an #if 0 in there that probably shouldn't be
> >
> > Yeah, the whole stuff can be removed, as it's added in later again :)
> > I'll create a new p
I don't think we should have this patch in the distribution. It shouldn't
be that accessible as it has the potential to break behavior of both apps
and plugins. I think it belongs in a patches repository such as
http://www.zend.com/zend/week/pat/ (doesn't have to be that one in
particular, bu
To eliminate an fstat() most likely; it can stay, but it should
probably changed to #ifndef SKIP_PATH_CHECKS instead.
--Wez.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:50:09 +0200 (CEST), Derick Rethans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Wez Furlong w
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Wez Furlong wrote:
>
> > There's an #if 0 in there that probably shouldn't be
>
> Yeah, the whole stuff can be removed, as it's added in later again :)
> I'll create a new patch for it here.
hmm, no, this was a different patch. No
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Wez Furlong wrote:
> There's an #if 0 in there that probably shouldn't be
Yeah, the whole stuff can be removed, as it's added in later again :)
I'll create a new patch for it here.
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org
--
PHP
There's an #if 0 in there that probably shouldn't be
--Wez.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:10:52 +0200 (CEST), Derick Rethans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hei,
>
> This is Rasmus' patch including a configure option
> "--disable-path-normalization" to enable this patch. By default this
> option is of co
Hei,
This is Rasmus' patch including a configure option
"--disable-path-normalization" to enable this patch. By default this
option is of course turned off.
I am planning to commit this patch after 4.3.9 is released too, in case
there are no good objections.
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://der
Hei,
I backported Marcus' performance-improvement-when-not-using-a-key-in-foreach
patch to 4.3 and attached it. I am planning to commit this after 4.3.9
is released. If there are any comments, please let me know.
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.o
Jacques Marneweck wrote:
It would seem that this bug has appeared again, in 5.0.1 on Apache 2.0.50
I've had a report about it on the firebird-php list, and on checking it
would seem that it can be reproduced.
Could someone have a look and see if we are right please.
Come on people - have two sites
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:49:04 +0100, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote:
>
> > It would seem that this bug has appeared again, in 5.0.1 on Apache 2.0.50
> > I've had a report about it on the firebird-php list, and on checking it
> > would seem that it can be reproduced.
>
I needed the curl multi stuff for something, so I trivially backported it
to PHP4's ext/curl. There is nothing really PHP5-specific in it and it is
basically just a standalone extension keeping track with the 3rd-party
library it is wrapping. Ilia, as RM of the 4.3 tree, do you see any
reason not
32 matches
Mail list logo
