On 16.07.2008, at 00:50, Christopher Jones wrote:
We could still support older Oracle versions with an optional
download. If we want to be super fancy, we might even include a note
in an error message when trying to connect to older versions that
there is pdo_oci8 available as an optional
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Stefan Priebsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I was playing around with namespaces and stumbled across this:
#!/home/steve/php5.3-200807070430/sapi/cli/php
?php
namespace Foo;
use Foo::Bar as Something;
class Bar { }
?
works fine, whereas
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:50, Alexey Zakhlestin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Stefan Priebsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I was playing around with namespaces and stumbled across this:
#!/home/steve/php5.3-200807070430/sapi/cli/php
?php
namespace Foo;
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Hannes Magnusson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the only argument against using curly braces for namespaces
was exactly his example you can use namespace foo; {} if you really
want to?
OK:
namespace foo;
{
}
Not OK:
{
use Foo:Bar as Something;
}
--
Hello.
I think this should be optimized.
I'm not an expert ofcourse, but as I understood there is only one case witch
need a special treatment - require/include _one when a file with equal
contents is included from different directories.
You can make a switch witch controls if lstat is made or
Hello Andrey,
Tuesday, July 15, 2008, 6:30:50 PM, you wrote:
Marcus,
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Ulf,
Tuesday, July 15, 2008, 4:32:10 PM, you wrote:
Pierre Joye schrieb:
Drop the launchpad and use php's cvs. We have actually two development
branches (5.3 until the 24th and HEAD) and
I had the same problem 2 days ago, the thing is the ; - display_errors
= off in line 74 is just information. You have another display_errors
(mine is in line 374) change that to: on.
Op 16 jul 2008, om 04:34 heeft Thorsten Suckow-Homberg het volgende
geschreven:
By visiting php.info
Arvids Godjuks wrote:
Hello.
I think this should be optimized.
I'm not an expert ofcourse, but as I understood there is only one case
witch need a special treatment - require/include _one when a file with
equal contents is included from different directories.
You can make a switch witch
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 16.07.2008, at 00:50, Christopher Jones wrote:
We could still support older Oracle versions with an optional
download. If we want to be super fancy, we might even include a note
in an error message when trying to connect to older versions that
there is
On 16.07.2008, at 16:13, Christopher Jones wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 16.07.2008, at 00:50, Christopher Jones wrote:
We could still support older Oracle versions with an optional
download. If we want to be super fancy, we might even include a
note
in an error message when
Alexey Zakhlestin schrieb:
OK:
namespace foo;
{
}
Not OK:
{
use Foo:Bar as Something;
}
Then that is a showstopper that effectively does not allow to use braces
around a namespace, so I'd boldly suggest either fixing the curly braces
notation to allow use statements or disallow curly
The use can be used only as top-level statement.
Thanks. Dmitry.
Stefan Priebsch wrote:
Hi list,
I was playing around with namespaces and stumbled across this:
#!/home/steve/php5.3-200807070430/sapi/cli/php
?php
namespace Foo;
use Foo::Bar as Something;
class Bar { }
?
works fine,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Andrey Hristov wrote:
I am pretty lazy, thus I use my Thunderbird as a RSS reader. I get
planetmysql as a feed and if I am not interested in an article, I skip
it. It doesn't require even to go anymore to planetmysql . But even
more, Ulf is also on planetphp, so you
Derick Rethans schrieb:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Andrey Hristov wrote:
I am pretty lazy, thus I use my Thunderbird as a RSS reader. I get
planetmysql as a feed and if I am not interested in an article, I skip
it. It doesn't require even to go anymore to planetmysql . But even
more, Ulf is also
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 06:45 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Arvids Godjuks wrote:
Hello.
I think this should be optimized.
I'm not an expert ofcourse, but as I understood there is only one case
witch need a special treatment - require/include _one when a file with
equal contents is
Amir Hardon wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 06:45 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Arvids Godjuks wrote:
Hello.
I think this should be optimized.
I'm not an expert ofcourse, but as I understood there is only one case
witch need a special treatment - require/include _one when a file with
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Ulf Wendel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derick Rethans schrieb:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Andrey Hristov wrote:
I am pretty lazy, thus I use my Thunderbird as a RSS reader. I get
planetmysql as a feed and if I am not interested in an article, I skip it.
It doesn't
Pierre Joye schrieb:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Ulf Wendel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derick Rethans schrieb:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Andrey Hristov wrote:
I am pretty lazy, thus I use my Thunderbird as a RSS reader. I get
planetmysql as a feed and if I am not interested in an article, I
On 16.07.2008, at 17:47, Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 20:06:14 Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Arnaud,
if you can provicde the same for HEAD then I'll submit it. And if
you're
fast enough we might even get it into 5.3.0 :-) Johannes, Lukas, how
much time does he have?
Hi!
around a namespace, so I'd boldly suggest either fixing the curly braces
notation to allow use statements or disallow curly braces around
Use statements should be at the top, as the influence whole file scope.
namespaces, because as it is, it doesn't really seem useful.
What doesn't
Stanislav Malyshev schrieb:
Hi!
around a namespace, so I'd boldly suggest either fixing the curly
braces notation to allow use statements or disallow curly braces around
Use statements should be at the top, as the influence whole file scope.
I know, but namespace must be the first
Hi,
Does anyone agree that there is an issue to fix here? Messing with the
shutdown order is probably the last thing any RM would like to see
happening ..
regards,
Lukas
On 16.06.2008, at 04:55, Gregory Beaver wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting errors of hashtable already destroyed when running
Hi!
That means: I cannot use namespaces with curly braces combined with a
use statement. This makes the curly braces pretty pointless.
Well, don't use them then :)
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 16.07.2008, at 22:14, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
That means: I cannot use namespaces with curly braces combined with
a use statement. This makes the curly braces pretty pointless.
Well, don't use them then :)
I think Stefan was just pointing out that allowing something that is
Hi!
I think Stefan was just pointing out that allowing something that is
rarely useful is just needlessly confusing, because it makes you think
there is something you are missing.
It may be true in some cases, but in general PHP allows to do tons of
stuff that is not useful, or at least
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
zend_destroy_rsrc_list(EG(regular_list)). On the next line,
zend_post_deactivate_modules() is called, which steps through the module
list and unloads all the dynamically loaded modules. If one of these
dl() is really troublesome...
I think this issue could
Jochem Maas wrote:
[snip]
I have a few questions, some of the answers may deserve
a few lines in the docs.
1. to what extent is Phar capable/designed to handle self
updating Phars .. especially with regard to multi-user access
(I'm thinking in terms of a website+CMS+userdata in a Phar
updated
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
dmitry Thu Jul 10 14:27:21 2008 UTC
Added files: (Branch: PHP_5_3)
/php-src/ext/phar/tests rename_dir.phpt rmdir.phpt
/php-src/ext/phar/tests/tar rename_dir.phpt rmdir.phpt
/php-src/ext/phar/tests/zip rename_dir.phpt rmdir.phpt
Hi,
Some questions about namespaces now that PHP 5.3 continues to evolve
1) Do we need functions in namespaces now that we have closures?
One of the main reasons I wanted functions in namespaces was to
implement callbacks. Now that we have closures in PHP 5.3, for me there
is no longer any
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 9:36:24 pm Greg Beaver wrote:
Hi,
Some questions about namespaces now that PHP 5.3 continues to evolve
1) Do we need functions in namespaces now that we have closures?
One of the main reasons I wanted functions in namespaces was to
implement callbacks. Now that
30 matches
Mail list logo