Tore B. Krudtaa wrote:
I would like to be able to use the upload hooks without installing the APC.
I would eventually like to be able to use those upload hooks using session
variables.
Maybe you can avoid the problem entirely. I was using the
uploadprogress PECL extension (which I believe
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Olivier Hill wrote:
Indeed, I forgot to test that case. If I remember correctly, there was
no test cases for that function, so I'll fix this tonight and add some
tests.
I didn't see a commit - have you forgotten about it?
regards,
Derick
--
HEAD before 5_3!:
Dear Srs,
We are having some zend_mm_heap corrupted errors followed by a
Segmentation fault (11) in our Apache2 + PHP 5.2.6 servers. There are few
information about this bug in internet:
* #40479 - http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=40479
* #43295 - http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=43295
I have
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 13:46 -0700, Tore B. Krudtaa wrote:
As most of you probably know Rasmus Lerdorf made som upload hooks
available in PHP 5.2 some long time back.
This was great news for those that wanted more control of uploads
and/or wanted to give real time
Hi Dmitry,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Hi Matt,
does the following code work with your patch?
?php
function foo() {
static $a = A + B;
var_dump($a);
}
const A = 1;
const B = 2;
foo();
?
It would be hard to explain why some of
Hi Matt,
For now I would like to disable -CONST constant expression which
started to work after your patch.
Later we are able to implement the complete constant expressions support.
Thanks. Dmitry.
Matt Wilmas wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent:
Hi Dmitry,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008
Hi Matt,
For now I would like to disable -CONST constant expression which
started to work after your patch.
Yes, that's what my new fix will do -- it's coming in just a minute, and it
also corrects
Matt,
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 10:52 -0500, Matt Wilmas wrote:
Adding these two array functions has been on the TODO for a while,
The patch can quite easily be tricked into an endless recursion of
php_array_replace_recursive() calls which will segfault:
$ php -r '$a = array(); $a[] = $a; $b =
Thanks Matt. I committed near the same patch.
It's not so optimal, but little bit more clear.
Thanks. Dmitry.
Matt Wilmas wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
For the behavior change that I mentioned in the other thread, with this
code:
function foo() {
static $a = -PHP_INT_MAX;
}
Which could work
Hi all,
Last week PHP_5_3 out of CVS built on my box under VC6; today it does not.
I have been told on irc (thanks Liz) that there is no intention of fixing
the breakage because 'the 2003 SDK has been a requirement since PHP 5.1'.
This is the first I ever heard of any such requirement -
hi,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Steph Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Last week PHP_5_3 out of CVS built on my box under VC6; today it does not.
I have been told on irc (thanks Liz)
It has been like that since literally years. Nothing new under the sun.
that there is no
Hi Pierre,
It has been like that since literally years. Nothing new under the sun.
Erm... no, it hasn't. That's why I'm reporting it now.
that there is no intention of fixing
the breakage because 'the 2003 SDK has been a requirement since PHP 5.1'.
This is the first I ever heard of any such
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Steph Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/platformsdk/sdkupdate/psdk-full.htm
It wants far more space than I actually have on my laptop hard drive. I
can't quite believe you're actually making this a *requirement* for the
first
Uninstall the old one, install the new one, et voila, no need to kill
a cat to get that solved. Now that we have cleared the true issue, let
us go back to work :)
Hard drive has 2.02 gigs, SDK installment requires 'at least 1.4 GB'. No
way, can't risk it, I need this laptop for work.
The
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Steph Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Last week PHP_5_3 out of CVS built on my box under VC6; today it does not.
I have been told on
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Steph Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Last week PHP_5_3 out of CVS built on my box under VC6; today it does not.
I have been told on irc (thanks Liz)
It has been like that
Hi Dmitry,
Do you know that with your changes, no substitution will happen in a
namespace even when using :: prefix? :-/ (That's what I would do when I
know it's global, for optimization.) Or is that what you meant by not so
optimal?
- Matt
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 11:48 -0500, Matt Wilmas wrote:
Ugh, I hate that reference/recursion stuff! I have a hard time following
what's happening, and am not sure how some of those checks, etc. even work
in php_array_merge() (which I was working from). :-/ I tried changing a few
parts,
Tore B. Krudtaa wrote:
To D. Dante Lorenso:
Thanks for notifying me of:
http://digitarald.de/project/fancyupload/
But I would still like to see the upload hooks accessible from within a
standard PHP inst., which would give me more control of the upload progress as
well as more control in the
Matt,
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 20:06 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 11:48 -0500, Matt Wilmas wrote:
Ugh, I hate that reference/recursion stuff! I have a hard time following
what's happening, and am not sure how some of those checks, etc. even work
in php_array_merge()
Hello Stefan,
please discuss with RMs when to merge this in. IMO such a nice locale
improvment can go in anytime during alpha when RMs approve.
marcus
Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 10:18:02 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
for everyone interested in getting
On 7/30/08 6:11 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not so happy that it was not possible to get this committed over the
weekend. Johannes did a quick review and it seems like it has enough
support from people and is low risk enough to get committed now. Lets
hope no extension
On 7/30/08 11:54 AM, Stanisla Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of questions about the patch:
1. Why allocate fixed-size buffer via individual malloc's on each
activate and free it on each deactivate? Won't it be better to just
allocate it once and use it?
I'll take a look at
23 matches
Mail list logo
