(looping in gsoc@)
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 00:39, David Coallier wrote:
>> Scott did.
>> I have asked _multiple_ times about the status of the project, all I
>> got was "he passed".
>>
>> Quote from Scott (from few months ago):
>> "he was to implement unicode support in more modules and convert a
> Scott did.
> I have asked _multiple_ times about the status of the project, all I
> got was "he passed".
>
> Quote from Scott (from few months ago):
> "he was to implement unicode support in more modules and convert an
> application.
>
> He's in the process of writing a conversion guide and I be
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 23:46, David Coallier wrote:
> 2009/3/13 Andrei Zmievski :
>> Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>>
>>> Regarding the migration item...
>>> Wasn't there a gsoc project last year that did exactly that?
>>
>> I think there was, but I don't know if they actually did anything.
>>
>
> Act
2009/3/13 Andrei Zmievski :
> Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>
>> Regarding the migration item...
>> Wasn't there a gsoc project last year that did exactly that?
>
> I think there was, but I don't know if they actually did anything.
>
Actually there was one which I was proposing to mentor since you
were
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
Regarding the migration item...
Wasn't there a gsoc project last year that did exactly that?
I think there was, but I don't know if they actually did anything.
-Andrei
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/uns
Sorry to spam the list with a reply to my own thread again, but there
were some errors in the example I posted, which would defeat the whole
idea of it being useful for somebody with the same question. Corrected
example:
ZEND_METHOD(xydelta, setStartDocument) {
zval *id, *doc = NULL;
xyd
Hi
2009/3/13 Pierre Joye :
> hi,
>
> Then I would rather have a beta2 and not a RC. This change while being
> great may require more tweaks, and as Marcus suggested, we could push
> APC in too while being at it. I'm all for it (both :).
I must admit that I think it would be bad to delay 5.3 more
hi,
Then I would rather have a beta2 and not a RC. This change while being
great may require more tweaks, and as Marcus suggested, we could push
APC in too while being at it. I'm all for it (both :).
Cheers,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
> On 11.03.2009, at 17:10,
Hi,
I've fixed all the issues I found in the original patch (attached).
However then I realized that speed-up was caused by bugs that leaded to
render pages in improper way. After fix the speed-up disappear. :(
So now I don't see any reason to include it into 5.3.
Thanks. Dmitry.
Lukas Kahw
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 23:15, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> Also, please go through PHP 6 section [http://wiki.php.net/todo/php60] and
> remove or update any items that have been done or the scope of which has
> changed.
Regarding the migration item...
Wasn't there a gsoc project last year that did e
On 13.03.2009, at 00:39, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Christian Schneider wrote:
Things gettings reserved at a later stage (like originally
keywords, now
namespaces) can lead to a big deal of frustration. Therefore I
think it
is crucial to have a clear naming guide now.
And these guidelines have
11 matches
Mail list logo
