On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kris,
As discussed on other threads, PHPP files that are called directly from
the
webserver are handled by the SAPI handler and thus
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:20 PM, John LeSueur john.lesu...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kris,
As discussed on other threads, PHPP files that are
Kris Craig wrote:
I object significantly to a few points here. One is the concept of a
magic file extension. Why should a file behave differently just
because of a different extension? In general, extensions are human
readable clues to what's in the file. Yes, they are usually used for
hi!
Without willing to end discussions prematurely, it looks to me that
everything possible have been said about the various opening tags
proposals. For one, I do not follow any of these discussions anymore.
And I suppose I am not the only one.
I would strongly suggest to move to the actual
On 14/04/12 03:41, Kris Craig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:37 PM, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com
mailto:davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/04/12 15:13, Kris Craig wrote:
Again, the controller should NOT be a .phpp file. Likewise,
your model
should NOT be hooking
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi!
Without willing to end discussions prematurely, it looks to me that
everything possible have been said about the various opening tags
proposals.
Actually, we finally appear to be making some headway. I appreciate
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 3:58 AM, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/04/12 03:41, Kris Craig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:37 PM, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/04/12 15:13, Kris Craig wrote:
Again, the controller should NOT be a .phpp file. Likewise, your
hi,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps a new list for RFC-specific discussions? =)
We don't need yet a new list. Sit down together and get over your
differences and create the RFC or more if you can't get over your
differences.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Kris Craig wrote:
I object significantly to a few points here. One is the concept of a
magic file extension. Why should a file behave differently just
because of a different extension? In general, extensions are
On 15/04/12 16:29, Kris Craig wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:20 PM, John LeSueur john.lesu...@gmail.comwrote:
The second thing that still needs nailing down as far as implementation is
how to determine parsing mode. If it has to be specified at include time,
then we're putting the burden
Am 15.04.2012 08:20, schrieb John LeSueur:
Since you're looking for input, specifically on the compromise, let's try
to figure out what's possible. The RFC proposes .phpp files that can only
include other .phpp files. Others want .phpp files that can include .php
files. There are two ways I can
I used to implement `public static function getClass() { return
get_called_class(); }`, so I really like this one, makes it also easier
for IDEs when refactoring code :)
Oh completely, that is one of the major benefits. My current workflow
for refactoring is to refactor with the built-in
I don't think a consensus on the following points is likely to emerge
without voting on them individually. I propose carrying out a vote
with up to three questions to be answered depending on your response
to each. We could then proceed to discuss the (relatively boring but
essential) details of
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jannik Zschiesche he...@apfelbox.netwrote:
Am 15.04.2012 08:20, schrieb John LeSueur:
Since you're looking for input, specifically on the compromise, let's try
to figure out what's possible. The RFC proposes .phpp files that can only
include other .phpp
Hi Ralph, hi everybody,
given the clear use case and the simplicity of the patch, a very good idea.
With regards,
Lars
Am 15.04.2012 um 16:13 schrieb Ralph Schindler:
I used to implement `public static function getClass() { return
get_called_class(); }`, so I really like this one, makes
Well, it's time for me to remind about the techique many use (and some
frameworks provide it out of the box) - the application file concatination
to speed up file loading.
Yii framework provides a Yiilite.php file for this, that includes mostly
used core classes in one big file.that loads much
The gain has been described by myself and others quite a bit already. As
far as I can tell, the fact that some frameworks/libraries wouldn't be
compatible with this doesn't negate the unrelated advantages that do exist.
Worst-case scenario, you just wouldn't use this with those frameworks.
I posted the bellow text in other thread, but i should have it post here,
so i'm reposting it to this thread.
Well, it's time for me to remind about the techique many use (and some
frameworks provide it out of the box) - the application file concatination
to speed up file loading.
Yii framework
Hi, Michael
2012/4/13 Michael Morris dmgx.mich...@gmail.com
It would not be easy. I lack the skills required. And those who have
the skills lack the monumental time required. But PHP could do what
Adobe did with Actionscript. But it would not be easy or painless. It
probably isn't worth
2012/4/13 Dmitri Snytkine dsnytk...@ultralogistics.com:
I always wondered why can't we do something like this in php
class MyClass{
private $storage = new ArrayObject();
public function __construct($v){
// whatever
}
// rest of class
}
Why can't we create a new object and assign it
2012/4/14 Ralph Schindler ra...@ralphschindler.com:
Hi all,
There are many different use cases were in code we expect classes names as
arguments to functions as fully qualified names. We do this in ZF a lot
with our Service Location and DI components, but also with our code
reflection API,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Tom Boutell t...@punkave.com wrote:
I don't think a consensus on the following points is likely to emerge
without voting on them individually. I propose carrying out a vote
with up to three questions to be answered depending on your response
to each. We could
err it might be 1 week, not 2. Either way, it's definitely too soon for
mine to be voted on.
--Kris
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Tom Boutell t...@punkave.com wrote:
I don't think a consensus on the following
Bah sorry everyone, I just woke up and I'm still a little groggy lol. It
is in fact 2 weeks.
--Kris
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
err it might be 1 week, not 2. Either way, it's definitely too soon for
mine to be voted on.
--Kris
On Sun, Apr
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 8:44 AM, John LeSueur john.lesu...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jannik Zschiesche he...@apfelbox.net
wrote:
Am 15.04.2012 08:20, schrieb John LeSueur:
Since you're looking for input, specifically on the compromise, let's
try
to figure out
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Arvids Godjuks arvids.godj...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, it's time for me to remind about the techique many use (and some
frameworks provide it out of the box) - the application file concatination
to speed up file loading.
Yii framework provides a Yiilite.php file
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Arvids Godjuks arvids.godj...@gmail.comwrote:
I posted the bellow text in other thread, but i should have it post here,
so i'm reposting it to this thread.
Well, it's time for me to remind about the techique many use (and some
frameworks provide it out of the
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
The gain has been described by myself and others quite a bit already. As
far as I can tell, the fact that some frameworks/libraries wouldn't be
compatible with this doesn't negate the unrelated advantages that do
exist.
One thing I personally dislike in this implementation is the
difference between CLASS and class ... One with and one without
namespaces ...
I am not quite following. There is no functional difference between
class, CLASS, or Class. The parser is case insensitive with
regards to keywords,
Hi,
It would be better to vote
- PHP will have script only (tag less) code or not
then
- How it will be implemented
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi,
It would be better to vote
- PHP will have script only (tag less) code or not
then
- How it will be implemented
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
Awhile back, I raised the possibility of
31 matches
Mail list logo
