Hi,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> Just for casual discussion at this point:
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/3297
>
> switch ($a) {
> case FOO:
> // Works exactly as current behavior.
> break;
> case == FOO:
> // Nearly identical, though not
Just for casual discussion at this point:
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/3297
switch ($a) {
case FOO:
// Works exactly as current behavior.
break;
case == FOO:
// Nearly identical, though not using the ZEND_CASE optimization.
// Can probably make this equivalent to
Hi!
> That said, in my opinion it is too late for 7.3 to move a bundled
> extension to PECL, except perhaps for unresolved or even unresolvable
> security reasons. ext/wddx comes to mind, and maybe there are others.
I'd be happy to move wddx if nobody steps up to maintain it. It has tons
of
On 12.06.2018 at 22:09, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Yes, I think having some rules on maintainership would be nice, right
> now I haven't even considered extensions which have maintainers listed
> but no longer active, etc. - though I suspect those exist too. […]
>From looking at current
On 13.06.2018 at 21:26, Enno Woortmann wrote:
> I've changed the status of the currently introduced RFC to add the
> functions array_key_first() and array_key_last() to "Under Discussion".
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_key_first_last
Thanks for working on this, Enno!
I suggest to address
On 13.06.2018 at 16:48, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Stanislav Malyshev
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure it's too late for 7.3. If we see that the extension is
>> unmaintained, we could move it out for 7.3 I think.
>
> Well, you and cmb are the RMs for 7.3, so you get the
On 12.06.2018 at 23:33, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>>> I'm afraid this might be misused. It's too easy to update the year
>>> number, without actually doing *any* real maintenance work (“I'll come
>>> back to that later” …). Some automated process would be nice, but
>>> manually checking the bug
Hello internals,
I've changed the status of the currently introduced RFC to add the
functions array_key_first() and array_key_last() to "Under Discussion".
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_key_first_last
Regards,
Enno
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> I'm not sure it's too late for 7.3. If we see that the extension is
> unmaintained, we could move it out for 7.3 I think.
>
Well, you and cmb are the RMs for 7.3, so you get the largest say in
that, but IMO we won't finish sorting out
On Jun 10, 2018 10:46 PM, "Hoffman, Zachary Robert" wrote:
>The existence of anything that internally relies on `get_defined_vars()` is a
>blocker for applying further optimisations to the engine (think stack frames),
>which is probably why Dmitry suggested its removal.
I did not know it was
10 matches
Mail list logo
