> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 23:58, Alexandru Pătrănescu
> wrote:
>
> > But there is one more small elephant in the RFC that I believe should be
> > discussed.
> > null|false type will not be a nullable named type but it will be an union
> > between two named types.
> >
> > It's not totally unexpected.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 04:33, Levi Morrison
wrote:
> I don't see the word `void` in the RFC. I think there ought to be
> something said about how naked `null` is different or not different
> than `void`.
Added a section which attempts to explain the difference between both.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 a
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 4:21 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:21 PM Go Kudo wrote:
>>
>> The voting phase for the following RFCs will begin as soon as two weeks
>> have passed.
>>
>> https://externals.io/message/115975
>>
>> I don't see any particular discussion, so I'm contact
