On 26 juni 2013 at 08:35:59, Michael Wallner (m...@php.net) wrote:
On 25 June 2013 22:23, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 13:19 -0700, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
If I'm to understand this RFC correctly, it is nothing more than a
random suggestion
Hi all,
I just published an RFC that proposes to add catch-statement without needing
to specify a variable, and support for fully anonymous catches.
Details can be found at:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_catch
Regards,
Joost Koehoorn
Hi.
I am not sure about
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Joost Koehoorn
joost.koeho...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I just published an RFC that proposes to add catch-statement without needing
to specify a variable, and support for fully anonymous catches.
Details can be found at:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc
On 25 June 2013 17:07, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
No opinion on leaving off $e, but I'm against the generic catch{} statement.
I second the concerns about empty catch{}.
--
Regards,
Mike
As most of you seem to discard the idea about and empty catch (I can see why,
no
On 25 juni 2013 at 22:06:40, Sherif Ramadan (theanomaly...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
IMO actually it *makes* the code clearer, because $ignoredException is
not used, though a variable name like $ignored is
Hi all,
I just published an RFC that proposes to add catch-statement without needing to
specify a variable, and support for fully anonymous catches.
Details can be found at:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_catch
Regards,
Joost Koehoorn
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
On 25 juni 2013 at 01:20:04, Anthony Ferrara (ircmax...@gmail.com) wrote:
Joost,
First off, let me say welcome and thanks for the contribution!
I have a couple of questions around the intended proposal.
1. How do you plan on handling the case where there are multiple catch blocks?
try {
