On 23/01/15 09:27, Michael Wallner wrote:
On 23 01 2015, at 02:40, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net
wrote:
Hi!
Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and
dependencies (propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3
On 22/01/15 19:51, Levi Morrison wrote:
Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and dependencies
(propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3 I'd like to restart discussion on the
topic, whether it is feasible to add pecl_http as a bundled extension to
the core.
On Jan 28, 2015 4:49 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 23/01/15 09:27, Michael Wallner wrote:
On 23 01 2015, at 02:40, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net
wrote:
Hi!
Now, that I'm mostly done with porting
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 23 01 2015, at 09:11, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 23 01 2015, at 04:42, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Could you include http_build_query() modification in the RFC?
On 23 01 2015, at 02:40, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
Hi!
Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and dependencies
(propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3 I'd like to restart discussion on the
topic,
On 22 01 2015, at 19:51, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and dependencies
(propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3 I'd like to restart discussion on the
topic, whether it is feasible to add pecl_http as a bundled extension to
the core.
On 23/01/15 08:27, Michael Wallner wrote:
Well, I’m not the one to tell you that :) If I didn’t find it useful, I
wouldn’t have built it.
Don’t hesitate, if there are questions about what they conceptually are
trying to accomplish.
I think a short discussion about where to put the
On 23 01 2015, at 04:42, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Could you include http_build_query() modification in the RFC?
http_build_query() escapes ' ' as '+' currently. It should be '%20'.
I was about to proposing this change, but it was http_* function and
the change does not
On 23 01 2015, at 09:11, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 23 01 2015, at 04:42, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Could you include http_build_query() modification in the RFC?
http_build_query() escapes ' ' as '+' currently. It should be '%20'.
I was about to proposing
Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and dependencies
(propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3 I'd like to restart discussion on the
topic, whether it is feasible to add pecl_http as a bundled extension to
the core.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http
The RFC doesn't mention if you
Hi!
Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and dependencies
(propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3 I'd like to restart discussion on the
topic, whether it is feasible to add pecl_http as a bundled extension to
the core.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http
[1]
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and dependencies
(propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3 I'd like to restart discussion on the
topic, whether it is feasible to add pecl_http as a bundled extension to
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
Hi!
Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and dependencies
(propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3 I'd like to restart discussion on the
topic, whether it is feasible to add pecl_http as a bundled extension to
the
Hi PHP internals!
I've created an RFC for discussion:
Whether it is feasible to add pecl_http v2 to the core.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http
--
Regards,
Mike
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 09:49 +0200, Michael Wallner wrote:
Hi PHP internals!
I've created an RFC for discussion:
Whether it is feasible to add pecl_http v2 to the core.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http
In my opinion when moving this to core the http(s):// stream should use
the
On 19 August 2014 13:53, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
In my opinion when moving this to core the http(s):// stream should use
the same HTTP implementation so one has consistent behavior.
This would add a hard dependency on libcurl, which I'd be obviously fine
with.
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
