Hi,
In this way, classes can be considered as polymorphism, just like objects.
So is it OK to allow abstract static function in abstract class to support
this feature directory? Currently it is forbidden in HEAD, only interfaces
can have static function.
Thanks
2007/4/27, Etienne Kneuss [EMAIL
I've already proposed that 1-2 months ago, but now seems to be a good
time to discuss new things, so let's try again:
I believe it would be nice to be able to dynamically reference static
members, constants, and methods.
Currently, there is no way to do that and the only way would be to
create
Hi,
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Could you describe a couple of use cases where you would use such
things (i.e. in real world scripts/libraries)?
Sure, let's take an example:
You have a library that uses a factory pattern, but you'd like to cache
those already generated objects in a static
Hi,
I've already proposed that 1-2 months ago, but now seems to be a good
time to discuss new things, so let's try again:
I believe it would be nice to be able to dynamically reference static
members, constants, and methods.
Currently, there is no way to do that and the only way would be to
+1
Nice to be able to do this directly without resorting to call_user_func().
Edom
Etienne Kneuss wrote:
Hi,
I've already proposed that 1-2 months ago, but now seems to be a good
time to discuss new things, so let's try again:
I believe it would be nice to be able to dynamically
On 04/27/2007 04:37 PM, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
Hi,
I've already proposed that 1-2 months ago, but now seems to be a good
time to discuss new things, so let's try again:
I believe it would be nice to be able to dynamically reference static
members, constants, and methods.
Currently, there is
On 4/27/07, Antony Dovgal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/27/2007 04:37 PM, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
Hi,
I've already proposed that 1-2 months ago, but now seems to be a good
time to discuss new things, so let's try again:
I believe it would be nice to be able to dynamically reference static
+1
On 4/27/07, Tijnema ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/27/07, Antony Dovgal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/27/2007 04:37 PM, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
Hi,
I've already proposed that 1-2 months ago, but now seems to be a good
time to discuss new things, so let's try again:
I believe it
Hi,
It may have already been proposed, but I give it a shot:
I believe it would be nice to be able to dynamically reference static
members and constants.
Currently, there is no way to do that and the only way would be to
create a static method and use call_user_func(array($classname,
Hello Etienne,
besides a tiny bit of whitespace issues the patch looks fine. Actually we
use tabs at the beginning of lines here (prior and after |'s). Once you got
more people looking/commenting on the patch we mde decide whetehr to apply
it.
best regards
marcus
Tuesday, March 6, 2007,
10 matches
Mail list logo