I remember we agreed that OO code will have studlyCaps. I don't want to
have this long thread again (I was actually initially opposed but got
convinced/gave in).
You don't want a long thread? Then don't mention the topic.
As I don't have the time right now nor the setup, can someone
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 08:21 AM 1/21/2004 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I remember we agreed that OO code will have studlyCaps. I don't want to
have this long thread again (I was actually initially opposed but got
convinced/gave in).
You don't want a long
Hello Sascha,
Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 8:21:30 AM, you wrote:
I remember we agreed that OO code will have studlyCaps. I don't want to
have this long thread again (I was actually initially opposed but got
convinced/gave in).
You don't want a long thread? Then don't mention the
At 08:38 AM 1/21/2004 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 08:21 AM 1/21/2004 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I remember we agreed that OO code will have studlyCaps. I don't want to
have this long thread again (I was actually initially opposed but got
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
*see above*. Derick did this without consultation and even if you agree or
don't agree with it, he shouldn't have done it in the first place.
I added it without consultation too, that was wrong, so I corrected it :)
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP
Remind me to remove your Karma :)
At 07:08 PM 1/21/2004 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
*see above*. Derick did this without consultation and even if you agree or
don't agree with it, he shouldn't have done it in the first place.
I added it without
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 23:13:06 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CS
Hi,
there still seems to be confusion about the CS for OO code and since
Derick reverted the studlyCaps guidelines there is nothing in the CS style.
Could you revert the last commit back to version 1.26?
Guys,
I remember
