On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:58 AM guilhermebla...@gmail.com <
guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Overall, all these amendments are good in my opinion, but I'd like to
> challenge a few things:
>
> 1- On item 3, the acceptable targets would be: class, function,
> method, property,
Hi Benjamin,
Overall, all these amendments are good in my opinion, but I'd like to
challenge a few things:
1- On item 3, the acceptable targets would be: class, function,
method, property, class constant, parameter or all.
If possible, I'd like to ask if it's possible to expand this list and
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:54 PM Benas IML wrote:
> Thank you for the update! Given that there is still an open issue, is the
> RFC proposing flags or a separate `<>` attribute?
>
Good point, we came to the conclusion to simplify. Should attributes be in
the global namespace, then we shouldn't
Thank you for the update! Given that there is still an open issue, is the
RFC proposing flags or a separate `<>` attribute?
Best regards,
Benas
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020, 12:29 PM Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> I have changed back the rename from namespacing to Attributes\Attribute to
> using just
I have changed back the rename from namespacing to Attributes\Attribute to
using just Attribute after a few discussions off list. The reasoning is
that it becomes more clear that a majority of core contributors strongly
prefers using the global namespace as the PHP namespace and opening up this
