Pierre Joye wrote on 09/02/2015 00:05:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/02/2015 20:33, Zeev Suraski wrote:
FWIW, while I think strict types - stricter than even strict languages -
don't belong in PHP, this syntax is clearly a step up from
De : Rowan Collins [mailto:rowan.coll...@gmail.com]
Would more strict features be added to this mode later?
No.
Or would other keywords be added so that you could, ahem, declare
several directives at the top of your block?
No.
I think this is all rather optimistic - if you use a
Andrea Faulds wrote on 09/02/2015 00:05:
If you're going to go that far, why not just disallow the block-level syntax of
declare() for this case, if that is the complaint? Or if the problem is the
non-block syntax, why not enforce that a non-block declare(strict_types) be at
the top of the
, 2015 9:45 PM
To: PHP Internals
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Syntactical change to Scalar Type Hints RFC
Hi,
I’m posting this in a new thread since people might (reasonably) be
ignoring
further responses to the [VOTE] thread.
I’m considering a small change to the Scalar Type Hints RFC, specifically
Hi François,
On 8 Feb 2015, at 20:43, François Laupretre franc...@tekwire.net wrote:
De : Andrea Faulds [mailto:a...@ajf.me]
Instead, I’m wondering if the following might be better:
?php strict
Which would be used like so:
?php strict
function foobar(): int {
Hi,
I’m posting this in a new thread since people might (reasonably) be ignoring
further responses to the [VOTE] thread.
I’m considering a small change to the Scalar Type Hints RFC, specifically about
syntax. Quite a few people have said they don’t like the declare() syntax, and
it’s easy to
De : Andrea Faulds [mailto:a...@ajf.me]
Instead, I’m wondering if the following might be better:
?php strict
Which would be used like so:
?php strict
function foobar(): int {
return 1.0; // error!
}
It’d be a per-file directive, so there’d be zero mixing
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/02/2015 20:33, Zeev Suraski wrote:
FWIW, while I think strict types - stricter than even strict languages -
don't belong in PHP, this syntax is clearly a step up from declare(),
which
was definitely not
On 08/02/2015 20:33, Zeev Suraski wrote:
FWIW, while I think strict types - stricter than even strict languages -
don't belong in PHP, this syntax is clearly a step up from declare(), which
was definitely not intended for this purpose.
I'm kind of intrigued what purpose it *was* intended for.
hi,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi,
I’m posting this in a new thread since people might (reasonably) be ignoring
further responses to the [VOTE] thread.
I’m considering a small change to the Scalar Type Hints RFC, specifically
about syntax. Quite a
On 09/02/2015 00:05, Andrea Faulds wrote:
Secondly, it is less specific than the current proposal - it suggests that PHP has a generic
strict mode, rather than a strict type-checking mode.
It could be renamed to strict_types, but that loses some elegant.
Would more strict features be added
Hi,
On 8 Feb 2015, at 23:22, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/02/2015 19:44, Andrea Faulds wrote:
Hi,
I’m posting this in a new thread since people might (reasonably) be ignoring
further responses to the [VOTE] thread.
Incidentally, you still used reply to create
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
FWIW, while I think strict types - stricter than even strict languages -
don't belong in PHP, this syntax is clearly a step up from declare(), which
was definitely not intended for this purpose.
I think we get it, you do not
On 08/02/2015 19:44, Andrea Faulds wrote:
Hi,
I’m posting this in a new thread since people might (reasonably) be ignoring
further responses to the [VOTE] thread.
Incidentally, you still used reply to create this message, so mail
readers which base threads on headers (e.g. Thunderbird)
14 matches
Mail list logo
