Hi,
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 07:49 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
Let's keep things simple here, stay on topic and debate if we want to
start with 5.5 and who can RM it.
I wonder if we really need two RMs. This two-RM-thing was introduced
back when I was busy with different things at work,
David, I think you're experienced enough to fill this role alone.
One benefit to having two RM's is that Julien is learning from DSP. If
there is a strong reason to have only one RM, then maybe we should consider
a RM/vice-RM kind of pairing.
--
Herman Radtke
hermanrad...@gmail.com |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Herman Radtke hermanrad...@gmail.com wrote:
David, I think you're experienced enough to fill this role alone.
One benefit to having two RM's is that Julien is learning from DSP. If
there is a strong reason to have only one RM, then maybe we should consider
a
Hi,
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 17:05 +0200, jpauli wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Herman Radtke hermanrad...@gmail.com wrote:
David, I think you're experienced enough to fill this role alone.
One benefit to having two RM's is that Julien is learning from DSP. If
there is a strong
Am 17.09.2012 17:36, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
an README.
Does this have to be manual process? Is there something in it that
cannot be described in a
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 17:45 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Am 17.09.2012 17:36, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
an README.
Does this have to be manual
On 2012-09-17, Sebastian Bergmann sebast...@php.net wrote:
Am 17.09.2012 17:36, schrieb Johannes Schl?ter:
There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
an README.
Does this have to be manual
hi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 07:49 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
I wonder if we really need two RMs. This two-RM-thing was introduced
back when I was busy with different things at work, university,
live, ... when
hi,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
an README. Besides that all processes affect everybody in the
Hi internals,
it's been a great eight months now for PHP 5.4. We released 5.4.0 final
in february and since then we were able to deliver a new PHP version
every month (thanks to the hard work from stas).
As most people know we do not include patches in 5.4 that will break
backwards
On 08.09.2012 13:49, David Soria Parra wrote:
Let's keep things simple here, stay on topic and debate
if we want to start with 5.5 and who can RM it.
Hey,
sounds like a really good plan and apart from the probably most-often
named disadvantage, getting people to switch (hard enough to get minor
Hi,
I would like to ask everyone that wants to see some new feature in the next
bigger PHP update to create an RFC on the wiki. I have to check why the
register link [1] disappeared from the login page (anyone with a php.net svn
account can just login without registering). Ideally we will
12 matches
Mail list logo
